On 03/10/2023 19.30, Bastian Blank wrote:
thread. Or freak out because meta packages remain uninstallable in
backports for days.
...
plus gcc or we change how backports works.
If uninstallable packages in backports are a problem, perhaps backports
needs something like britney to migrate
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u2_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 2:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 07:30:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >...
> > The core problem is that people assume they can get headers matching the
> > currently running kernel, without upgrading first, see also the parallel
> > thread.
> >...
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 07:30:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>...
> The core problem is that people assume they can get headers matching the
> currently running kernel, without upgrading first, see also the parallel
> thread.
>...
If the new kernel has a regression that affects the user, the
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:29:47 +0200
with message-id <27aaed3b-cecd-4cd2-8b3c-d98f09583...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1053419: unblock: glibc/2.37-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053419,
regarding unblock: glibc/2.37-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: security
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: gl...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:glibc
[ Reason ]
glibc/2.37-12 fixes a local root vulnerability, I believe the package
should migrate as
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:glibc
Bug #1053419 [release.debian.org] unblock: glibc/2.37-12
Added indication that 1053419 affects src:glibc
--
1053419: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi Sam
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:31:57AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I still think it would help if you would work more on articulating what
> problem you are trying to solve with the linux-headers versioning
> change. I have read multiple versions of this proposal, and your
> follow-ups, and I
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Hej,
Am Montag, 2. Oktober 2023, 19:04:00 CEST schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
[...]
> Ping on this? It's urgent given the point release is planned for the
> coming weekend, and we're currently unsure if the related fix is safe
> to release without this one. If there's no answer we'll have to play
>
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_i386-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
> "Bastian" == Bastian Blank writes:
Bastian> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 04:35:08AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 25/09/2023 00.50, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> > Already built modules remain until someone deletes it. So you
>> can also > switch back to the still installed
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u9_source.changes
ACCEPT
17 matches
Mail list logo
