Hello Sylvestre,
Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
what I get :
$ cat hello.c
#include stdio.h
int main (void) {
printf (Hello, world!\n);
return 0;
}
$ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c lli hello.o
lli: hello.o: unknown type in type table
2010/8/24, Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org:
llvm-2.6 is on its way, and will be quite simple: no source changes
from the llvm package, just a few packaging bits.
There you go:
http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-2.6_2.6-10.dsc
http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm
Hi,
2010/9/9, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
The changelog for an earlier version mentions
- debian/control.in/source: Build-Depends on ocaml-nox (= 3.11.2),
ocaml-best-compilers | ocaml-nox, dh-ocaml (= 0.9.1).
which appears to have been lost in this version of the
Hi Steve,
Sorry for the long time to answer, I'm just back from six weeks
without a real Internet connection. Unfortunately, I'm going to have
limited time to dedicate to Debian for the next months. I should still
be able to sign build logs, do manual rebuilds for FTBFS, and fix some
of them when
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: oprof...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
oprofile is dynamically linked against binutils' libbfd, which doesn't
have a stable ABI and bumps soname quite often. From
/usr/lib/oprofile/libopagent.so.1.0.0:
Hi!
During the DebConf, Matthias Klose and I discussed about llvm in
Squeeze and took a few decisions, but the freeze has been announced
before I uploaded the corresponding work. We would like to make llvm
2.7 (which is already used by clang and openjdk) the default version,
but some packages
2010/8/15, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 19:01 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
We would like to make llvm
2.7 (which is already used by clang and openjdk) the default version,
but some packages (ldc and python-llvm) still need llvm 2.6.
[...]
The things to do
2010/8/16, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 22:21 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
2010/8/15, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 19:01 +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote:
- Rename the current llvm source package to llvm-2.6 and
replace
2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
As I said, my primary concern from a release point of view is whether
there are good reasons for doing the changes now, rather than waiting
for squeeze+1.
As Matthias said, the reason is to get the good llvm version installed
when users type
Hello,
2010/8/20, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org:
I don't think that stable is the place for doing active development.
Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be made suitable
for active development?
If it's
2010/8/20, Ludovic Brenta ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org:
Arthur Loiret aloi...@debian.org writes:
Are you saying that we are developing an operating system which is not
suitable for active development, or that it shouldn't be made suitable
for active development?
I think he meant that stable
2010/8/23, Pierre Habouzit madco...@madism.org:
It's just that LTO isn't that a compelling reason, it's not 100%
production ready. The plugin infrastructure is though. But you're citing
dragonegg, and last time I checked, you had to patch gcc to export one
more symbol. If you haven't applied
2010/8/23, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Wed, August 18, 2010 11:50, Arthur Loiret wrote:
2010/8/18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
This package still needs a bit of work, but not on this
side.
Ah, I'd assumed everything was basically ready to go and just waiting
Hi,
Here are a few packages which should build fine on alpha, now that the
following packages are available on alpha:
libglib2.0-dev 2.18.4-2
libgnome2-dev 2.20.1.1-2
libgnomeui-dev 2.20.1.1-2
libgconf2-4 2.24.0-7
libwxgtk2.8-0 2.8.7.1-1.1
python-gnome2-extras 2.19.1-3.1
The packages to
Hi,
Here are some more packages which should build fine because
Build-Dependencies are now available on alpha:
gb ldtp_1.5.0-1 . alpha
gb me-tv_0.7.14-1 . alpha
gb tracker_0.6.90-2 . alpha
And here are some failures I cannot reproduce, maybe they worth try a
give-back too:
gb
Hi,
The following packages are failing because
jack-audio-connection-kit_0.116.1-4 is not Uploaded on alpha yet:
dw gnuradio_3.0.4-2 . alpha . -m 'jack-audio-connection-kit (= 0.116.1-4)'
dw gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.10-3 . alpha . -m
'jack-audio-connection-kit (= 0.116.1-4)'
dw
Hi,
While looking at failures on hppa, it came out some packages need a gb/dw:
# wxwidgets2.8_2.8.7.1-1.1 now Installed
gb filezilla_3.2.2.1-1 . hppa
gb boinc_6.2.18-3 . hppa ia64
# ruby1.9 is now Installed
gb libgpgme-ruby_1.0.4-1 . hppa
# libccrtp_1.7.1-2 now Installed
gb libzrtpcpp_1.4.3-3
Hi!
The following packages are waiting for openmpi to be fixed on alpha
(see #517543):
dw arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-1 . alpha . -m 'libopenmpi-dev (= 1.3)'
dw gromacs_4.0.3-1 . alpha . -m 'libopenmpi-dev (= 1.3)'
dw minc_2.0.17-1 . alpha . -m 'libopenmpi-dev (= 1.3)'
dw mpi-defaults_0.2 . alpha
18 matches
Mail list logo
