Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package tmpreaper
This NMU of mine includes a debconf translation update.
unblock tmpreaper/1.6.13+nmu1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ucf
This NMU of mine includes several debconf translation updates.
unblock ucf/3.0025+nmu1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package wwwoffle
Yet another bubulle NMU with debconf translation updates.
unblock wwwoffle/2.9f-2.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package xmame
Yet another NMU originally aimed at fixing debconf translations. That
one included a debhelper compatibility level bump from 4 to 7 and a
few other
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package clock-setup
This version adds a fix by Aurélien Jarno, for the kFreeBSd port of D-I.
* Don't bind mount /dev to /target/dev before calling hwclock. It
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package debian-installer-launcher
This version only includes translation updates.
unblock debian-installer-launcher/3
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package partman-basicfilesystems
Version 65 added several fixes for Hurd and kFreeBSD ports...and
introduced debconf templates...which were translated in version
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 13:12:18 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package mailgraph
It looks like this reverts the 1.14-1.3 and 1.14-1.4 NMUs?
That's correct, nice catch...
:-(
Julien (Valroff), would you mind preparing a new
Quoting Julien Valroff (jul...@kirya.net):
Do you mind explaining what you expect from me exactly?
I had already applied some of the fixes introduced in your patches (but not
all).
I think the best is to make a new 1.14-4 package, including all the changes
which weren't already applied and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package calife
This release(re-)introduces on-the-fly update of config.{sub|guess}
that was lost in -1 after a switch to debhelper 7 with a minimal
debian/rules
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, and ping us again in a
couple of weeks time.
OK, thanks for giving us this perspective. I'm now working on merging
branches in our SVN (yes) to upload a 3.5.4 package in unstable
(packaging
Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
On 05.09.2010 22:17, Christian Perrier wrote:
This release(re-)introduces on-the-fly update of config.{sub|guess}
that was lost in -1 after a switch to debhelper 7 with a minimal
debian/rules file.
Hi Christian,
just thought to let you know
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:15:06 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package orville-write
This NMU of mine consists mostly of debconf translation updates (and a
debhelper compatibility level bump from 4 to 7, which I usually
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
Please go ahead with the upload to unstable, and ping us again in a
couple of weeks time.
Done. I'll ping as soon as we have a reasonable expectation that
packages got enough testing.
That was a not-so-trivial merge so I don't exclude some
Quoting Julien Valroff (jul...@kirya.net):
How should I number the updated 1.14-1.4? Should it be uploaded to
testing-proposed-updates, am I right?
I'd say 1.14-1.4squeeze1 and, yes, upload to t-p-u (let's have
confirmation from Julien Cristau, though)
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Testing has samba 3.4.8. We recently asked for pre-approval for 3.5.4
for squeeze. The RT suggestion was to upload it to unstable and after
a few weeks to prod them again for a possible freeze exception.
In the meantime, yesterday (Sept 14th) upstream released a security
update (3.3.14, 3.4.9,
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
Assuming that the diff between the 3.4.8 packages currently in testing
and the tpu package would simply be upstream's patch from their security
page, please go ahead.
Thge diff will be the exact diff between two upstream versions.
So that
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:03:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Archive Administrator (instal...@ftp-master.debian.org):
Reject Reasons:
samba-doc_3.4.9~dfsg-1_all.deb: old version (2:3.4.8~dfsg-2) in unstable
= new version (2
Quoting Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org):
Hi release team,
now that squeeze is frozen I thought that it is time to upgrade my
girlfriend’s laptop from lenny to squeeze, so that any bugs we find can
be fixed before the release :-) Here is the chronological upgrade report
(in case that
Quoting Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org):
yes. It was a “pretty normal” lenny installation with deliberately
little changes to the system.
I think we should reconsider the priority of the GRUB2 question. Maybe
lower it down to medium?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org):
Ftpmasters, is there something that can be done on your side?
This is #584909.
I'll try to see if I can provide a fix.
I know you're attending the ftpmaster meeting right now, if I properly
read Ganneff's annoucements. Is there a chance that
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Do you think samba 3.5.5 is not ready to migrate yet, otherwise I would
just unblock it?
(re-narrowing to -release)
Well, Adam said upload and ping us in a couple of weeks time. That
was on Sun 5th. So, technically speaking, we're in a couple of weeks
Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package apt-listchanges
Meh, I'm really sorry for the mess: with 2.85.4 I wrongly updated the debconf
template instead of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
On Sept 7th, after a discussion with the RT, represented by Adam, I
uploaded samba 3.5.4 to unstable.
Adam suggested that we upload and then come back in a couple of weeks
time to check
Quoting Dererk (der...@debian.org):
Dear Release-Team,
I'm asking for a pre-approval to upload vidalia to t-p-u, to be uploaded not
before 7 days from now, when debconf translation round call ends.
The package in unstable includes a new upstream release, and basically this
pkg version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package calife
Adam agreed for me to do the upload with the following change:
* Update config.{guess,sub} by using --with autotools_dev switch
to dh. Thanks
Quoting Nathan Scott (nath...@debian.org):
Hi all,
I've had some user requests for this - would it be possible to allow
the xfsprogs-3.1.3 from unstable (for awhile now), which fixes #593320,
to replace the xfsprogs-3.1.2 currently in testing?
While at it, may you consider #144876?
Quoting Nathan Scott (nath...@debian.org):
- Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Nathan Scott (nath...@debian.org):
While at it, may you consider #144876?
Its not relevent here, where we're discussing fixing actual
bugs, and should definately not change
Quoting Julien Valroff (jul...@kirya.net):
I must admit I am not sure what to do to fix the situation. Should I ask to
the translators to update their translations for the templates currently in
testing?
You certainly can, yes. You can use podebconf-report-po and adapt the
message to explain
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
What does this leave us for squeeze?
* Shipping 2.30.2 with its stability problems, with no upstream
support and no hope to really fix them.
* Shipping this patched 2.32 version which should be much more
stable.
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
Ping. Are you requesting removal of the obsolete binaries, or working
on getting the package built?
Sorry, neither of those. After getting your answer, I moved the
package to the crap that won't probably ever be fixed and did
nothing.
IMHO, the
Recommends
+ * Drop a spurious patch introduced by a wrong use of source v3.0,
+that was unapplying 01-spurious-langnames.patch
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:14:43 +0200
+
ttf-tuffy (20071106-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Christian Perrier ]
diff -Nru ttf-tuffy
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
It took all of 90 minutes from filing an ftp.d.o bug to the old binaries
being gone. I have trouble calling that never.
IMHO, the unnblock request bug can be closed.
Do you still want the package updated?
If that's technically possible
Quoting Fabian Greffrath (fab...@greffrath.com):
Hi -release,
please let ttf-tuffy_20071106-3 migrate to testing. It removes a
spurious patch that was introduced by wrong usage of source v3.0. It was
unapplying 01-spurious-langnames.patch, which fixed a nasty upstream bug
in the font source
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debconf
This version adds a bunch of translation updates...
unblock debconf/1.5.36
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT
Yes, this is a new upstream version.
However, the samba 3.5 series is now well stabilized and the Samba
Team has been very committed to its strict policy of no new features,
only important (and trivial) bug fixes (they have a release manager
who is about as strict as you guys are..:-)).
As samba
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package foomatic-filters. The only change is the
addition of a debconf translation update.
unblock foomatic-filters/4.0.5-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tripwire
Testing has -3. Release -4 and -5 only add debconf translation updates.
unblock tripwire/2.4.2-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mnogosearch
This upload (which I made myself, as the package is orphaned) ass one
debconf translation.
unblock mnogosearch/3.3.8-3
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package flashybrid
This package includes an updated Spanish debconf translation and two
others unfuzzied (one fuzzy string because of a missing parenthesis in
the English
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 23:09 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Please unblock package mnogosearch
This upload (which I made myself, as the package is orphaned) ass one
debconf translation.
The package also hasn't been in testing
Quoting Valessio Brito (cont...@valessiobrito.info):
I've been working on a theme funny (SpaceFun[0]), but I guess not
appeal to everyone (businesses, severe environments, etc.).
I made the effort to hear other proposals, it seems that only had two
proposals: Debian Ciel[1] and Nightly[2].
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package seyon
Well, the package is orphanedso an unblock might be debatable.
This new version fixes a pending debconf l10n bug and sets Debian QA
as maintainer.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package proofgeneral
This new version of that orphaned package adds a Danish translaiton
update.
unblock proofgeneral/3.7-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package epos
This new version of an orphaned package adds a Danish translation
update.
unblock epos/2.5.37-9
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package radiusd-livingston
This package includes two debconf translation updates.
unblock radiusd-livingston/2.1-19
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
So that just leaves us with the question of whether we want to
reintroduce an orphaned leaf package. Admittedly, if the FTBFS hadn't
lain unattended for a few months then it might never have been removed
in the first place...
FOr this, I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nodm
nodm was kept out of testing because of outdated binary packages for
kfreebsd-*. This was due to #575265. That bug was fixed by no longer
building for these
Quoting Julien Valroff (jul...@kirya.net):
Hi,
Le samedi 02 oct. 2010 à 09:35:34 (+0200), Christian PERRIER a écrit :
Quoting Julien Valroff (jul...@kirya.net):
I must admit I am not sure what to do to fix the situation. Should I ask
to
the translators to update
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package qmail
This NMU only adds a small bunch of translation updates. Please note
that this package is in non-free: not sure if that needs specific
handling for testing
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package qmail
This NMU only adds a small bunch of translation updates. Please note
that this package is in non-free
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or
operator
be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor).
No. Both of those groups also have other meanings.
How about the root group?
signature.asc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fts
This NMU adds a few translation updates. Please note that the former
version if 0.1-4. There has been no 0.4-4.1 in the archive (that one
was uploaded by me but
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package interchange
This new version only adds updated translations.
unblock interchange/5.7.6-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ircd-hybrid
And again
unblock ircd-hybrid/1:7.2.2.dfsg.2-6.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package havp
YAPWTU (Yet Another Package With Translation Updates)
unblock havp/0.91-1.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lire
Another one...
unblock lire/2:2.1-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package adjtimex
Guess what? Translation updates, of course..:)
unblock adjtimex/1.29-2.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mason
Guess what? l10n strikes again
unblock mason/1.0.0-12.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package synce-serial
Translation updates
unblock synce-serial/0.11-5.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nodm
Some more translation updates...
unblock nodm/0.7-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@dogguy.org):
YAPWTU (Yet Another Package With Translation Updates)
havp isn't in testing and seems to be broken anyway… so we won't unblock
it (yet?).
Fair enough. As these updates are part of several batches meant to
deal with pending l10n issues, I happen
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ocsinventory-server
Translation updates...
unblock ocsinventory-server/1.02.2-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package memtest86+
And l10n again...
unblock memtest86+/4.10-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pam
debconf translation updates
unblock pam/1.1.1-6.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Hello Marco,
May I ask you what are your plans about futher uploads of udev?
163-1 then 163-2 made their way to testing and 164-1 was uploaded to
unstable (but has no unblock request as of now).
Meanwhile a few debconf translation updates (for that important new
templates recently introduced)
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these
users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new package with a minimal
fix for #601506.
Hmmm,
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org):
Well, that's really not fair. Translators could ask the Release Team
whether it is relevant to consider translating/updating a $package,
I don't really understand where's your point, Mehdi. What we're
talking about is mostly my own energy or Reinhard's
In order to be able to activate support for the Sinhala language in
D-I, we need to have a udeb of the needed font.
That udeb has to be provided by the ttf-sinhala-lklug package. A patch
is sitting in the BTS for 1.5 years.
At the time we worked on this patch, I proposed the maintainer to join
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
I hereby propose to upload an NMU of this package (patch attached),
Patch *really* attached..:)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 4f3a730..e293b89 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+ttf
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these
users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package strongswan
This NMU (made with maitnainer's approval) adds a few debconf
translations
unblock strongswan/4.4.1-5.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:15:48 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Do you plan to upload 164-2 to unstable at some time in a near future
and then ask for an unblock (though this is a new upstream)? Or would
you upload 163-3 with these updates
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 19:01 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
I hereby propose to upload an NMU of this package (patch attached),
Patch *really* attached..:)
The changelog version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tasksel
The new version contains translation fixes plus some needed changes to the
desktop tasks:
* Add openoffice.org-kde to kde-desktop for better integration
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ttf-sinhala-lklug
This package adds a udeb, which is needed to activated Debian
Installer for the Sinhala language.
Please note that the package is currently in
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
I don't like the backport9 patch. This is going to break touchpad
toggle for people, as currently F22 in the kernel maps to
XF86TouchpadToggle in the X keymaps.
So, are there plans to have the needed fixes in squeeze, avoid
this regression and,
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tasksel
Please hold off that one. Pending changes in git should also go to squeeze:
tasksel (2.85) UNRELEASED
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Please note that the package is currently in NEW.
Not anymore, thanks to ftpmasters.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package boxbackup (from t-p-u)
This package adds debconf translations that were fixed in the version
in unstable, which however does not qualify for squeeze.
The NMU to
Quoting Marco d'Itri (m...@linux.it):
On Nov 19, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
So, are there plans to have the needed fixes in squeeze, avoid
this regression and, as a side effect, get Updated one or more
debconf translations. (Closes: #601182) in squeeze?
I always have
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package console-data
This version brings new translation updates (resync with translations
from console-setup...but not the problematic s...@latin.po file..:-))
unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package masqmail
This package (NMU) adds two translation updates.
unblock masqmail/0.2.27-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
(request sent in case the maintainer accidentally omit doing the
request themselves)
Please unblock package openldap
Translation updates.
unblock openldap/2.4.23-7
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ddclient
Two translation updates (one being to fix the encoding of a
translation, accidentally broken by a mistake of mine in a previous NMU)
unblock
(copie de travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+ttf-lao (0.0.20060226-7) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Create udeb meant to be used for the graphical installer
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:26:13 +0100
+
ttf-lao (0.0.20060226-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Drop defoma use
Quoting Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org):
Christian/Kęstutis: can you look at the patch and see if it's
something that you'd be willing to make an new upload with? [I'll try
to get a test in with a new fontforge on s390 if you'd be willing to
upload a package with it, assuming that it fixes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dotlrn (just in case its maintainer forgets
about asking for unblock)
* Fixed severe vulnerability in the api-browser: it was possible to
pass to the query
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package openacs
Same changes than dotlrn
unblock openacs/5.5.1+dfsg-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
Quoting Kęstutis Bilūnas (ke...@kaunas.init.lt):
Št, 2010 11 27 18:10 -0800, Don Armstrong rašė:
I haven't had time to go deep into the problem besides creating a
smaller test case. See #594629 and the work that Nico Tyni has done; I
think he may be closest to a patch.
During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read
from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation
of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised.
Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.30 or
whatever other funky new
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and
release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to
happen?
There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such
situations as there is no clear plan of the
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org (18/07/2009):
I didn't realise that udeb-generating packages were still frozen. Is that
necessary? Could you please let 3.1.2p1-1 into testing. It has a security
fix for CVE-2009-0692
You're
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
That seems feasible and sustainable, isn't it?
There is a webpage [1] tracking it, maybe it should just be used more?
That's pulled information (one has to think about visiting the page,
etc.).
I happen to think that pushed information could be more
Quoting Nelson A. de Oliveira (nao...@debian.org):
Hi!
samba is uninstallable in unstable, as it depends on libtalloc1:
samba: Depends: libtalloc1 (= 1.3.0) which is a virtual package.
libwbclient0: Depends: libtalloc1 (= 1.0.1) which is a virtual package.
A binNMU should fix
Quoting Andrew Pollock (apoll...@debian.org):
What is the right way of doing this transition?
Should I pick a date in the future that I plan on uploading the 4.1 package
to unstable and then file a bug against each package, and the do NMUs as
needed on that date?
At least for samba,
As libiw29-udeb has been replaced by libiw30-udeb, it is my
understanding that netcfg might need a binNMU.
Unless this is done, D-I is not buildable in unstable.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, not long ones when using
+mangling method = hash. Closes: #561545
+ * Fix mangling of file or directory names that contain
+dots. This bug was revealed when fixing #561545
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:32:02 +0100
+
samba (2:3.2.5-4lenny7) stable-security
The geneweb package has an historically piece of code in its postinst
script that deals for recursively fixing permissions and owners in the
/var/lib/geneweb directory (the place where genealogical databases
that are served by the main daemon are stored).
There might be work in the future to
The mentions in the offending files mentioned in this bug report are
very clearly copy and paste that was made without thinking by the
people who did so.
A very good example are the wo_SN, ca_AD, eu_FR (and maybe a few
others), which I am the author of. So, yes, I am one of those people
who
101 - 200 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
