Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

(Since I didn't get cc'd in the original reply, I'm replying here. Sorry about that.) Am 26.01.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: On 01/26/2015 07:54 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: unblock open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4 That patch doesn't look right. Calling systemctl from an init script

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

Am 27.01.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Michael Biebl: Am 27.01.2015 um 13:07 schrieb Christian Seiler: Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong anyway. As I said before: that breaks sysvinit systems

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

Am 27.01.2015 um 06:19 schrieb Michael Biebl: Of course, if you have a better idea of how to do this? Aside from shipping real native unit files, that's probably the least invasive change: - Drop $remote_fs from the open-isci LSB header and replace it with $local_fs. That looks wrong

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

Am 31.01.2015 um 08:48 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: This is a follow-up on the comments that were made on changes to open-iscsi. Please review attached debdiff, which should have all changes included. Hi Ritesh, I think you made a mistake: you've now merged both changes (the initial ones that

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8

/debian/changelog 2015-02-10 20:10:11.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,53 @@ +open-iscsi (2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [e707e75] Exclude iscsid.conf from dh_fixperms. (Closes: #735773) + + -- Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:00:54 +0100 + +open-iscsi

Bug#779244: (pre-approval) transitional /etc/insserv/overrides support for Jessie's systemd

it. Thank you for considering! Christian [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759001 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=106;filename=sysv-generator-add-support-for-etc-insserv-overrides.patch;att=1;bug=759001 From: Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de Date: Tue, 17

Bug#785240: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8

On 05/13/2015 09:04 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: The issue is fixed in unstable (-9) in such a way that it won't resurface again if the control file is updated to build the udeb for even more architectures in the future. I suppose you mean 3ea68751abe4f3cf4c44a9695fff8742f80f43b4; Yes. but

Bug#785240: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8

) + + -- Christian Seiler christ...@iwakd.de Wed, 13 May 2015 20:01:02 +0200 + open-iscsi (2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8) unstable; urgency=medium * [e707e75] Exclude iscsid.conf from dh_fixperms. (Closes: #735773) diff -Nru open-iscsi-2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500/debian/rules open-iscsi-2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500/debian

Bug#785240: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8

On 05/23/2015 11:19 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 20:33 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: The attached debdiff for stable fixes the immediate problem for Jessie (but does not include other changes from unstable). Please go ahead. Thanks

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> ppc64: >> >> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We >> have over >> 11.000 packages installed > [...] >> sparc64: >> We are close to

Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

Dear release team, Britney seems to have stopped in sending notifications about testing migrations to package maintainers: - I didn't get notified that open-iscsi migrated to testing yesterday. - The package tracker [1] doesn't have an entry for that either. I also checked that if I look at

Re: Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

Hi again, > - I didn't get notified that open-iscsi migrated to testing yesterday. Great, I have the worst luck w.r.t. timing, just as a I sent the email I got the notification. :/ > sorry for the noise. Regards, Christian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Britney migration/removal emails not sent and removals not processed?

On 03/09/2016 08:14 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The footer of every mail should say exactly that. Yes, unfortunately I read that only after I sent my mail - I had previously thought Britney would run only once a day. Had the package migrated only today and the email had been immediate, I

Bug#832123: nmu: mksh util-vserver (dietlibc rdeps, security)

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hello, I recently uploaded a security update of dietlibc to sid (security and LTS teams for updates for (old)stable have been notified), and since it is a static library, some of the rdeps

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

On 07/24/2016 10:18 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need >> to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages: >> >> nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jes

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need > to be binNMUs in stable for the following three packages: > > nmu minit_0.10-5 . ALL . jessie . -m "Security: rebuild against fixed > dietlibc&quo

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On 07/04/2016 03:01 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just > like a normal jessie release, but with a

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

+ + * Security: fix insecure default PATH. (Closes: #832169) +Thanks to Thorsten Glaser <t.gla...@tarent.de> for discovering this + + -- Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:41:00 +0200 + dietlibc (0.33~cvs20120325-6) unstable; urgency=low * Team upload. d

Bug#855456: unblock: dietlibc/0.34~cvs20160606-6

+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +dietlibc (0.34~cvs20160606-6) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Héctor Orón Martínez ] + * debian/control: drop myself from maintainers field. + + [ Christian Seiler ] + * arm64: fix accidental register reuse in __testandset (Closes: #851379) + * Add Thorsten Glaser

Bug#855459: Handling of libowfat/arm64 (+ rdeps)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de Dear release team, (not user-tagging because I'm unsure about the category) After having fixed the last RC bug in dietlibc, I've gone back and looked at what packages might need rebuilds (since dietlibc is a statically

Bug#835537: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1

On 08/26/2016 08:12 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > Tags: jessie > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-iscsi-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, k...@debian.org > > Dear rel

Bug#835537: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1

On 09/06/2016 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 20:12 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > [...] > +open-iscsi (2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2) jessie; urgency=medium > + > + * [6d8d26d] init script: wait a bit after iSCSI

Bug#832171: jessie-pu: package dietlibc/0.33~cvs20120325-6

On 09/04/2016 07:30 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 22:18 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> On 07/23/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: >>> Since dietlibc is a static library, after the upload, there will need >

Bug#835537: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1

initramfs after copying +configuration to target system. (Closes: #834830) + + -- Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> Sat, 20 Aug 2016 11:14:44 +0200 + open-iscsi (2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium * [725c5c6] Populate udebs in every architecture they are buil

Re: Next d-i release

On 10/19/2016 03:33 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare > a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming > hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting > in unstable for the time being.

Bug#827061: transition: openssl: Unrelated updates to rdep packages?

Hi, On 10/26/2016 10:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed I have a quick question now that the transition is ongoing: is it OK for me to upload a new version of open-isns (B-D: libssl-dev) that's unrelated to this transition? (New upstream version, some debconf

Re: embedding openssl source in sslcan

Hi, Am 2. Januar 2017 11:35:30 MEZ, schrieb Thijs Kinkhorst : >On Fri, December 23, 2016 18:53, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior schrieb: >> >> Please use t...@security.debian.org if you want to reach the security >> team, not

Re: Question on package removal sleekxmpp

Hi, not part of the release team, but: On 03/23/2017 10:34 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > there is a security bug open (#854739) and I'll try to port a > simple patch from slixmpp. (Or, if does not work, just remove > the affected functionality - better no carbons than "dangerous" > ones.) > >

Bug#859947: unblock: open-isns/0.97-2

2017-01-25 10:37:36.0 +0100 +++ open-isns-0.97/debian/changelog 2017-04-09 12:58:39.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +open-isns (0.97-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Rui Branco ] + * Add Portuguese translations of debconf messages (Closes: #858746) + + -- Christian Seiler <chr

Bug#870465: stretch-pu: package tiny-initramfs/0.1-3

: #869668) + + -- Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:24:02 +0200 + tiny-initramfs (0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control: enable Vcs-Git/Vcs-Browser fields. diff -Nru tiny-initramfs-0.1/debian/control tiny-initramfs-0.1/debian/control --- tiny-initramfs-0.1/

Bug#865057: stretch-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.874-2

Hi, On 06/27/2017 04:51 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-20): >> Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-19): >>> After a quick review, that looks good to me. Thanks for keeping the >>> changes minimal in unstable, which

Bug#870465: stretch-pu: package tiny-initramfs/0.1-3

On 08/06/2017 03:40 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:41:37AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: >> I'd like to perform a stable update for tiny-initramfs that fixes >> #869668: tiny-initramfs-core was missing a dependency on cpio, >> causing it to fail w

Bug#865632: release-notes: document that 'iscsitarget' was dropped in Stretch

Package: release-notes Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org Dear release team & release notes editors, I recently received a bug report from a person using the 'iscsitarget', which was dropped in Stretch, as it hasn't seen any update upstream since 2014 - and the

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On 05/26/2017 09:30 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> I've looked at that for a bit, and found out that this is my own >> fault: one of the uploads of open-iscsi I did before the freeze >> changed the logic on how the initiatorname was generated within the >> installer, (due to feedback from Ubuntu

Re: Last chance for d-i changes in stretch

On 05/26/2017 07:04 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > You might have noticed final preparations for d-i Stretch RC 4 are > underways. A new debian-installer upload (or a binNMU) will need to > happen before the first stretch release (aka. r0). If there's anything > you want or would like to include in

Bug#865057: stretch-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.874-2

16.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +open-iscsi (2.0.874-3~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * [8de3092] udeb: don't update initramfs when iSCSI is not used. +(Closes: #863435) + + -- Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:06:16 +0200 + open-iscsi (2.0.874-2) unstab

Re: [Pkg-iscsi-maintainers] Bug#865628: Please add information about this incompatibility to the installation/upgrading guide

Control: reassign 865628 release-notes Control: forcemerge 865632 865628 Hi, On 09/24/2017 06:41 PM, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I hit this issue as well after upgrading to Stretch, and I don't > consider mentioning such a major incompatibility in the bug only to > be appropriate. I have actually read

Bug#885069: stretch-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.874-3~deb9u1

] Fix multiple security issues in iscsiuio. (CVE-2017-17840) +(Closes: #885021) + + -- Christian Seiler <christ...@iwakd.de> Sat, 23 Dec 2017 13:09:13 +0100 + open-iscsi (2.0.874-3~deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium * [8de3092] udeb: don't update initramfs when iSCSI is not used. dif