Bug#855071: unblock: gscan2pdf/1.6.0-5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gscan2pdf
v1.6.0-5 fixes bugs 854956 and 854957 (normal severity)
debdiff attached
unblock gscan2pdf/1.6.0-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
diff -Nru gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/changelog gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/changelog
--- gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/changelog2017-01-15 15:52:43.0 +0100
+++ gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/changelog2017-02-12 16:01:45.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gscan2pdf (1.6.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Closes: #854956 (fails to reload settings after scanning for devices)
+ * Closes: #854957 (rounding error from scanimage causes device to be
rejected)
+
+ -- Jeffrey Ratcliffe <j...@debian.org> Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:01:45 +0100
+
gscan2pdf (1.6.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
* + patch to fix bug attaching PDF to email
diff -Nru
gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/patches/0001-Suppress-errors-from-CLI-frontends-caused-by-roundin.patch
gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/patches/0001-Suppress-errors-from-CLI-frontends-caused-by-roundin.patch
---
gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/patches/0001-Suppress-errors-from-CLI-frontends-caused-by-roundin.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++
gscan2pdf-1.6.0/debian/patches/0001-Suppress-errors-from-CLI-frontends-caused-by-roundin.patch
2017-02-12 15:57:17.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+From 09e3583ba0a88e70b2925c46497baee231687ac3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jeffrey Ratcliffe <jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com>
+Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:35:50 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Suppress errors from CLI frontends caused by rounding
+
+---
+ History | 5 ++
+ MANIFEST | 1 +
+ lib/Gscan2pdf/Frontend/CLI.pm | 17 +++--
+ t/06293_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t | 151 ++
+ 4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+ create mode 100644 t/06293_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
+
+--- a/MANIFEST
b/MANIFEST
+@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@
+ t/06290_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
+ t/06291_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
+ t/06292_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
++t/06293_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
+ t/06295_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
+ t/07_Dialog_Renumber.t
+ t/081_Frontend_CLI.t
+--- a/lib/Gscan2pdf/Frontend/CLI.pm
b/lib/Gscan2pdf/Frontend/CLI.pm
+@@ -108,12 +108,19 @@
+ running_callback => $options{running_callback},
+ finished_callback => sub {
+ my ( $output, $error ) = @_;
+-if ( defined $error and $error =~ /^$options{frontend}:[
](.*)/xsm )
+-{
+-$error = $1;
+-}
+ if ( defined $error and defined $options{error_callback} ) {
+-$options{error_callback}->($error);
++while ( $error =~ /([\r\n])/xsm ) {
++my $le = $1;
++my $line = substr $error, 0, index $error, $le;
++$error = substr $error, index( $error, $le ) + 1,
++ length $error;
++if ( $line =~ /^$options{frontend}:[ ](.*)/xsm ) {
++my $msg = $1;
++if ( $msg !~ /rounded/xsm ) {
++$options{error_callback}->($msg);
++}
++}
++}
+ }
+ my $options = Gscan2pdf::Scanner::Options->new_from_data($output);
+ $_self->{device_name} = Gscan2pdf::Scanner::Options->device;
+--- /dev/null
b/t/06293_Dialog_Scan_CLI.t
+@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
++use warnings;
++use strict;
++use Test::More tests => 1;
++use Glib qw(TRUE FALSE);# To get TRUE and FALSE
++use Gtk2 -init; # Could just call init separately
++use Sane 0.05; # To get SANE_* enums
++use Sub::Override; # Override Frontend::CLI to test functionality
that
++# we can't with the test backend
++
++BEGIN {
++use Gscan2pdf::Dialog::Scan::CLI;
++}
++
++#
++
++my $window = Gtk2::Window->new;
++
++Glib::set_application_name('gscan2pdf');
++use Log::Log4perl qw(:easy);
++Log::Log4perl->easy_init($FATAL);
++my $logger = Log::Log4perl::get_logger;
++
++my $help_out = <<'EOS';
++Usage: scanimage [OPTION]...
++
++Start image acquisition on a scanner device and write PNM image data to
standard output.
++
++-d, --device-name=DEVICE use a given scanner device (e.g. hp:/dev/scanner)
++--format=pnm|tiff file format of output file
++-i, --icc-profile=PROFILE include this ICC profile into TIFF file
++-L, --list-devices show available scanner devices
++-f, --formatted-device-list=FORMAT similar to -L, but the FORMA
Bug#683506: gscan2pdf freeze exception
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock gscan2pdf-1.0.4-5. It fixes a serious (#682818[2]) and an important bug (#680158[1]) I attach a debdiff from -4 to -5. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680158 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682818 4-5.diff Description: Binary data
Re: gscan2pdf freeze exception
On 29 July 2012 12:57, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: According to the BTS, #682818 also affects the version in testing. If so, could you please wait till 1.0.4-4 has migrated. This makes the diff much easier for me to review. Would you also unfreeze uploads which fix important bugs (I'm looking at 680158[1])? Regards Jeff [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680158 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacg2wbz_quec4vwd+bcn40jkjdvvgqmxxunu0gdnsur5wt+...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gscan2pdf freeze exception
On 25 July 2012 23:28, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: Unblocked, thanks for the fixes. Thanks. I was expecting gscan2pdf 1.0.4-4 to now migrate automatically from sid to wheezy. Were you expecting me to upload to wheezy? In the mean time, I would like to upload 1.0.4-5 to sid to fix 682818[1] Should I go ahead, or wait for 1.0.4-4 to resolve itself? Please keep me in cc, as I am not subscribed. Regards Jeff [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682818 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CACg2wbwhVbqv3AhqqJDHb8iaZv1t-8jbBj-RqqQxSzf=pcs...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gscan2pdf freeze exception
On 29 July 2012 12:57, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: gscan2pdf/1.0.4-4 should migrate with the next Britney run (in about 12 hours). Thanks for the heads-up. According to the BTS, #682818 also affects the version in testing. If so, could you please wait till 1.0.4-4 has migrated. This makes the diff much easier for me to review. Yes. I'll wait until then. Regards Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacg2wbx7epxrq4fqrdj6stygh9n3po6uvllntxytb-0y18h...@mail.gmail.com
gscan2pdf freeze exception
I've just uploaded gscan2pdf 1.0.4-4 to sid. -2 is currently in wheezy. Please find attached a debdiff between -2 and -4 which fixes two serious bugs: #678911(Device-dependent options disappear after selecting Lineart mode) #682100gscan2pdf Recommends cuneiform which is in non-free Please keep me in cc, as I am not subscribed. Regards Jeff Ratcliffe gscan2pdf_1.0.4-2-4.debdiff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On 23 July 2011 22:42, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: I'm tying up loose ends and this bug is still outstanding for Squeeze. Do you have plans for an upload and would you like any help? I apologise for not revisiting this in any sane length of time. All of my (little) time has been taken up with gscan2pdf upstream development. I will get to this, but cannot promise when. Please feel free to NMU this if you wish. Regards Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cacg2wbwjpo3p2bojg9kequtsposiveyrzw_6_vw+8uhmyjr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On 6 March 2011 23:09, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: For the record, I'd be happy with the squeeze upload either as is or with the quilt bump + more expansive changelog entry; the main issue Uploaded Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTik7jg5SX25SCsROWgZ4tpFDfD=b...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On 22 March 2011 22:42, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Any news on either of the uploads? Apologies for the delay. RL is throwing up some issues which are taking my time at the moment. I hope to get to it at the weekend. Regards Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikamdesgyw3r+ahrqg+okrj9_3xirhfkahav...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
Hi Adam, On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2 +squeeze1, which is conventional. Sure. This will be my first contribution directly to stable or oldstable, as I am sure you can tell. I've updated the oldstable package to also conform. There was no mention of the convention in the Developers' Reference[1]. Is this worth a bug report? - It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of dh --with-quilt triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is already included there (and the warning has thus been dropped by the version of lintian in experimental). I've dropped it, assuming you are correct, and asked Jakub Wilk, who prepared the original NMU, to confirm. Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. That's fine (and the right way to do it). Sorry, but your answer is ambigious. Would you like the extra two bugs opened (and closed)? I would also suggest that the Developers' Reference could be improved to confirm this, one way or the other. Regards Jeff [1]http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable tesseract_2.03-2+lenny1.debdiff Description: Binary data tesseract_2.04-2+squeeze1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
On 6 March 2011 23:56, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: Adam is correct, I bumped b-d to shut up lintian: Thanks for confirming that. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikkKS4-OS7xKNm=wDa=dS2h94JmYDb+oJ=hi...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#612032: tesseract: rewrite arbitrary user file
Attached are debdiffs to fix #612032 for the relevant packages in lenny and squeeze. Are you happy for these to be uploaded to stable/oldstable? Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. Regards Jeff Ratcliffe tesseract_2.03-3.debdiff Description: Binary data tesseract_2.04-3.debdiff Description: Binary data
Re: gscan2pdf REMOVED from testing
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:39:33PM +, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the gscan2pdf source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9.29-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk # done 2009-11-22 I don't understand why gscan2pdf was removed. The grave bug has been closed. Does anyone have any insight? Will v0.9.30-2 hit testing in its current state? Please cc me on replies, as I am not subscribed. Regards Jeff signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: gscan2pdf REMOVED from testing
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:50:22PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:39:33PM +, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the gscan2pdf source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9.29-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/luk # done 2009-11-22 It was removed more than 2 months ago. The bug was only closed way later. Thanks for the swift reply. It was removed once 2 months ago. The bug was closed and it hit testing again, only to be removed again last week. It is this second removal that I am confused about. The current package should hit testing in about 7 days AFAICS. In which case my question is merely academic. Regards Jeff signature.asc Description: Digital signature
