Hi release team / wb maintainers,
here at ICFP I feel a slight push to upload updated Haskell packages for
Debian. Now as we are in the freeze I am not supposed to do that into
unstable, as only stuff that I want to enter wheezy should go into
unstable until the release (that’s right, isn’t it?).
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.10.2012, 18:50 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Sonntag, den 28.10.2012, 00:14 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
I see. Can you elaborate on the severity of the problem? Do such request
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 04.11.2012, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 22:11:42 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
@release-team: There is a reportedly grave bug with haskell-warp, and a
fix is available. Unfortunately, the route of updating testing via
unstable is broken
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.07.2012, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
haskell-cryptocipher has stopped building on powerpc. The problem is a
a compiler issue, but we have no fix available
(http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/6156). This prevents the
following list of packages from (re
Hi Erik,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.07.2012, 21:28 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
Its seems we have a fix for this bug (mainly the work of Ben M
Colins).
I am in the process of preparing a simple patch for 7.4.1. Can we get
this in for the next Debian release?
with next release you mean
Hi Jonas,
Am Montag, den 09.07.2012, 15:32 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
So we need another pandoc upload removing the use of the threaded
runtime (Jonas?), then apply for a freeze exception and then get pandoc
_and_ yesod into wheezy.
are you reading this? Do you plan to do such a pandoc
Dear release team,
Am Montag, den 16.07.2012, 20:55 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Montag, den 09.07.2012, 15:32 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
So we need another pandoc upload removing the use of the threaded
runtime (Jonas?), then apply for a freeze exception and then get pandoc
Hi,
these plug-ins need recompilation against gaim beta4:
#[package]_[source-version], [reason], [binNMU number], [list of archs]
gaim-encryption_3.0~beta5-3, gaim beta4, 1, alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
gaim-hotkeys_0.2.0-1, gaim beta4, 1,
Hi release team,
now that squeeze is frozen I thought that it is time to upgrade my
girlfriend’s laptop from lenny to squeeze, so that any bugs we find can
be fixed before the release :-) Here is the chronological upgrade report
(in case that is of use to someone):
Changed the apt-sources to
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 20:26 +0200 schrieb Christian PERRIER:
Quoting Joachim Breitner (nome...@debian.org):
Hi release team,
now that squeeze is frozen I thought that it is time to upgrade my
girlfriend’s laptop from lenny to squeeze, so that any bugs we find can
be fixed
Hi release team,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 18:47 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
On 23.09.2010 16:51, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 14:58 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Package: haskell-llvm
Version: 0.8.0.2-2
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 09:36 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Seg Set 27 09:05:06 -0300 2010:
(...)
helium is in testing but not buildable:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598174
due to uuagc missing there.
Hi releae team,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.10.2010, 01:26 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:44:32 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
unblock haskell-gtk/0.11.0-5
Done (and unblocked libffi which this depends on on armel,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, for some reason
Hi,
for the Debian Haskell Group, I’ve started to write a script that
calculates required binNMU requests (due to new dependencies). It is at
a very early, prototypical state, but here are first results. I only ran
it for i386, amd64 and powerpc this time:
$ ./haskell-pkg-infos.py
# Found ghc6
Hi Marco, hi everyone else.
Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 08:58 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva:
Em Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:16:39 +0200 Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
escreveu:
# Architecture: amd64
# Needs binNMus for these sources:
# missingpy, haskell-haskeline, hdbc-odbc
Hi,
unrelated to the automatic binNMUs I have spotted some build-failures
that will work now, so here are the give-backs. I hope that these
problems become less frequent when we can automatically schedule binNMus
with complete Dep-Wait lines.
gb hdbc-sqlite3_2.1.0.2-1 . amd64 sparc . -m 'Try
Hi release team,
I’d like to start having an eye on the next ghc6 migration. The package
has now built on all arches but ia64. Besides that, by looking at
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc6, it’s mostly
library that have either
* not been updated to the newer ghc (such
Hi d-release, d-haskell,
Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 11:06 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
Agreed. Will you prepare the upload?
It's in my home dir (marcotmarcot-guest) in alioth. Can you upload it?
Uploaded.
@h-release: This upload of haskell-devscripts fixed build failures on
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.07.2009, 22:46 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
Joachim Breitner wrote:
@h-release: This upload of haskell-devscripts fixed build failures on
s390. Please apply these five give-backs:
You mean dep-waits and having give-backs together with dep-waits does
not make any sense
Hi,
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php is an endless source
of build failures...
gb hdbc . sparc
gb haskell-fgl haskell-irc . mips
dw haskell-unixutils . hppa mips . -m libghc6-regex-compat-dev (= 0.92-1.1)
gb haskell-regex-compat . armel
gb darcs-monitor . alpha i386 mips
Sorry, forgot one:
dw haskell-unixutils . armel . -m libghc6-regex-compat-dev (= 0.92-1.1)
The build failure of haskell-regex-compat is strange:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=haskell-regex-compat;ver=0.92-1.1;arch=armel;stamp=1247521981
Check arch
──
** Using build
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 14.07.2009, 15:47 +0200 schrieb Albin Tonnerre:
The packages are now depending on versions of the EFL (ecore, evas, edje)
which
are no longer available, which makes them uninstallable. A rebuild should be
enough.
nmu python-evas_0.3.1+svn20090515-1 . ALL . -m
Hi,
a new version of ghc6 has been uploaded, and all library will have to be
rebuild. This is the (hopefully) complete set of binNMUs for it,
together with appropriate Deb-Waits to queue them:
nmu haskell-alut_2.1.0.2-1 . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 mips mipsel powerpc
s390 sparc . -m'Rebuild
Am Mittwoch, den 22.07.2009, 21:03 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:49:13PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
a new version of ghc6 has been uploaded, and all library will have to be
rebuild. This is the (hopefully) complete set of binNMUs for it,
together
Hi,
thanks for starting the binNMUs. Since the documentation indexes are now
built for -dev packages, haddock needs to be available in the right
version. This was not reflected by the previous round of debwaits. Here
are some Dep-Wait additions, affecting all packages in the first level
of the
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 11:06 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:28:35AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
dw haskell-binary haskell-hunit haskell-stm haskell-uulib haskell-x11
haskell-diff haskell-haskell-src haskell-quickcheck1 haskell-mtl
haskell-time
Hi,
pandoc is using a non-standard way of packaging and the nmutool did not
detect the needed Dep-Waits properly. Some arches even built it with the
old ghc6 already. So here is the cleanup, with carefully crafted
per-arch depwaits :-)
nmu pandoc . alpha armel s390 sparc . -m Rebuild against
Hi,
the depwaits for hslogger were incomplete and missing the network
dependency (maybe a bug in nmutool, kaol, can you look at it?).
Also, sparcs built it already with the wrong ghc6, I guess the nmus
yesterday were did not all apply properly, or this is a case of a race
condition.
Please
Hi,
it seems that even more buildds have built too early :-(
nmu haskell-parsec2 . alpha armel hppa s390 sparc . -m Rebuild properly
against ghc6 (= 6.10.4)
dw haskell-parsec2 . ALL -ia64 . -m ghc6 (= 6.10.4), libghc6-mtl-dev (=
1.1.0.2-7+b1)
dw haskell-parsec2 . ia64 . -m ghc6 (= 6.10.4),
Hi,
next packages:
dw haskell-irc . alpha armel hppa s390 sparc . -m libghc6-parsec2-dev (
2.1.0.1-1+b1)
dw haskell-irc . amd64 i386 mips mipsel powerpc . -m libghc6-parsec2-dev (=
2.1.0.1-1+b1)
dw haskell-irc . ia64 . -m libghc6-parsec2-dev (= 2.1.0.1-1)
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim
Hi,
I guess there were some bugs in the nmutool that I used. I now read my
way through the code and fixed some. Especially, we now have Dep-Waits
on ghc6 itself :-)
Sparc was most severely affected by it. Please schedule the attached w-b
commands to get sparc back on track.
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Hi,
libghc6-haskell-doc hat strict dependency on ghc6-doc, but (being
arch:all), it would not be updated by a binNMU. I did a sourceful upload
to fix this:
dw xmonad haskell-hgl haskell-x11-xft xmonad-contrib . ALL . -m
'libghc6-haskell-doc (= 1.4.5-6)'
Danke,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata
Hi,
I went through my unhandled mails from yesterday and put the requests,
after updating them, into one file. Please apply these wb-commands and,
ignore any previous mail.
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I went through my unhandled mails from yesterday and put the requests,
after updating them, into one file. Please apply these wb-commands and,
ignore any previous mail.
just added one more line :-)
Greetings,
Joachim
Hi
I made a typo in
Am Samstag, den 25.07.2009, 18:03 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
# fixed x11 doc package
dw xmonad haskell-hgl haskell-x11-xft xmonad-contrib . ALL . -m
'libghc6-haskell-doc (= 1.4.5-6)'
the Dep-Waited-upon package does not exist.
So here is a new file that fixes
Hi,
the emergency fix to make all packages that dep-wait on ghc6, also
dep-wait on haddock helped to avoid FTBFS, but also introduced a nice
circular dependency for haddock itself :-). Please do
gb haddock . armel ia64 mips mipsel sparc . -o
dw haddock . ia64 mips . -m 'ghc6 (= 6.10.4-1)'
[...@d-release: w-b-commands collected at the end]
Hi Erik,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.07.2009, 18:34 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’ve scheduled the binNMUs to make all libraries recompile against ghc6.
I assume that this might break some packages. To track
issue.
Thanks for the try, I will return with another give back request in a
month or two.
That's not the way to go... waiting does rarely fix problems. Either
it's a (temporary) bug in the change made by Joachim Breitner or the
set of available packages has changed on sparc (and you
Hi Trent,
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 17:21 +1000 schrieb Trent W. Buck:
mmap and hashed-storage got through NEW in the last twenty-four hours.
Unfortunately, they immediately need a rebuild for (only!) amd64.
I guess this is because the archive still requires a binary package to
be
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 09:42 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
PS: Is someone actively monitoring the progress of the haskell transition?
I was a bit off due to illness and other issues, but I was planing to
have a look at open issues, especially the build state, the next days.
But I hope
Hi,
a few more required NMUs of packages from NEW spotted :
nmu haskell-language-c_0.3.1.1-1 . i386 . -m 'Updated dependencies: ghc6
(version 6.10.4-1, but dependency 6.10.3+), ghc6-prof (version 6.10.4-1, but
dependency 6.10.3+)'
nmu haskell-polyparse_1.3-1 . i386 . -m 'Updated
Hi,
I uploaded haskell-network and haskell-parallel, and there are binNMUs
due. Note that the script also cought some packages on ia64 that were
built against the old ghc6 before:
nmu ftphs_1.0.5-1 . alpha amd64 hppa i386 mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -m
'Updated dependencies:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2009, 13:45 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes:
There seem to be many RC bugs regarding Haskell in unstable/testing,
mainly due to the ongoing transition. Can you please look into build
failures and other issues preventing the transition from happening?
I regularly look at the
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2009, 10:55 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula:
@kaol: Is there anyone actively working on it?
None of the upstream developers use ia64, so fixing this is likely to
be up to Debian. There's a chance that the upcoming 6.12 release
(scheduled for September-November) will fix
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2009, 23:51 +0300 schrieb Riku Voipio:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:35:04PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
Please don't remove ghc6 on ia64 from unstable. ghc6 has a
Build-Depends on ghc6 and the current 6.8.2 on ia64 is sufficient for
building 6.12.
would dropping
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this package has failed a few weeks ago due to missing
libmysqlclient-dev, which should be available now, I think:
gb haskell-hsql-mysql/1.7.1-1 . mips
Also, mips has a wrong depwait for hslogger.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi release,
just uploaded haskell-digest, thus:
nmu haskell-zip-archive_0.1.1.3-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against updated
haskell-digest
dw
reassign 550182 release.debian.org
thanks
Am Donnerstag, den 08.10.2009, 10:07 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Package: haskell-zip-archive
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
As subject says, this package has unfulfillable binary dependencies,
which are
Hi John,
Am Sonntag, den 01.11.2009, 17:50 -0800 schrieb John MacFarlane:
I thought I'd let you know that I'm still unable to install
libghc6-zip-archive-dev on sid. I get:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libghc6-zip-archive-dev: Depends: libghc6-digest-dev ( 0.0.0.6+)
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.11.2009, 20:10 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
@debian-release, please adjust these DepWaits:
gb . haskell-zip-archive . alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -o
dw . haskell-zip-archive . alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
when uploading haskell-regex-posix to unstable to fix FTBFS errors, I
by accident updated the version in experimental, but uploaded to
unstable. I hope that there are not ABI breaks, but based on the
block 558230 by 557157
affects 557157 + haskell-hsh haskell-regex-base haskell-regex-compat
affects 557157 + haskell-regex-posix haskelldb-hdbc haskelldb-hdbc-odbc
affects 557157 + haskelldb-hdbc-postgresql haskelldb-hdbc-sqlite3
affects 557157 + hdbc hdbc-odbc hdbc-postgresql
thanks
Hi Erik,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I had outdated packages on my computer when building this, sorry:
nmu hdbc_2.2.0-2 . amd64 . -m Rebuild against haskell-convertible in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
missingh-1.1.0.1-1 was broken due to an update of a
dependencies’ dependency, which is not handled sufficiently well by our
generated binary dependencies. (See the d-haskell for more information)
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.12.2009, 20:48 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
jcristau mentioned on #debian-rele...@irc.debian.org that hppa is not 64
bits. Sorry about that:
nmu alex_2.2-0.1 arch2darcs_1.0.13 bnfc_2.2-3.1 c2hs_0.15.1-4
cpphs_0.7-4 darcs_2.0.2-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
a new upstream version of haskell-utf8-string was uploaded, and it seems
to me that the mainatainer did not request binNMus for the reverse
depdendencies yet. Please schedule the following rebuilds:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this is a follow up to #565263. My script did not schedule this binNMU
the last time (I guess the package was in state Building, but
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2010, 22:51 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
The upcoming lenny point release includes a fix to ghc6 to resolve a
deadlock issue on 64-bit architectures, together with a number of
binNMUs for affected packages on those architectures.
ghc6 has not managed to build on
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I uploaded two haskell library packages to experimental, together with a
new version of haskell-devscripts, which depends on the new ghc6
compiler present in experimental. Two arches have started to
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2010, 22:53 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Montag, den 18.01.2010, 19:50 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva:
Qua, 2010-01-13 às 18:49 +0100, Joachim Breitner escreveu:
with ghc6-6.12.1, it is really easy to use hash-based dependencies. I
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 30.01.2010, 17:56 +0100 schrieb Simon Ruderich:
The Debian update 3.0.4 updates libghc6-xmonad-dev to 0.7-2+b1
but libghc6-xmonad-contrib-dev depends on 0.7-2. This causes a
conflict and prevents the update of libghc6-xmonad-dev.
hmm. With the current haskell packages,
)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:26:43 +0100
+
xmonad-contrib (0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Build against the new haskell-x11 with xinerama support
diff -u xmonad-contrib-0.7/debian/control xmonad-contrib-0.7/debian/control
--- xmonad-contrib-0.7/debian/control
Hi,
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 18:50 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:37 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 31.01.2010, 15:51 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Whilst admitting to not knowing much about the haskell packaging
personally, would it be a large
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 14.02.2010, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes:
Kari Pahula wrote:
The lack of ghc6 on ia64 has kept it from testing since 6.10.1. I
never got it built with a 6.10 compiler but seems like we're pretty
close to getting there
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info writes:
nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account
for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)
*sigh*
I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info writes:
nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m Rebuilt against
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
ok, then maybe something is broken with
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash
because only 2.2.9-4 is listed for amd64?
It's a feature.
Both /status/package.php and /pkg.cgi only display binNMUs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it seems that https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ is not updated any more
since about January. It would be nice to get those dumps working again.
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Release Team,
for Haskell libraries we now have a system of provides and depends in
place that guarantees that an ABI change in one of the packages makes
broken reverse dependencies uninstallable,
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 11:23 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
nmu ghc6_6.12.1-9 . i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m 'Rebuild with
ghc6-6.12.1-10'
dw ghc6_6.12.1-9 . amd64 hppa i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
kfreebsd
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Such a change is expected to happen very rarely, but we want to be
prepared. Therefore, from ghc6-6.12.1-10 on, ghc6 also provides virtual
packages corresponding to the ABIs contained in them. We need all
haskell
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
it seems that I did not give the required binNMU requests for alpha, so
here they are:
nmu cpphs_1.9-2 . alpha . -m 'Rebuild with ghc6-6.12.1-10'
dw cpphs_1.9-2 . alpha . -m 'ghc6 (= 6.12.1-10)'
Hi,
thanks for scheduling.
Am Samstag, den 20.02.2010, 13:32 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
and as promised, a hand-crafted list of give-backs of packages which were
failing due to ABI mismatches:
All done, after inserting the missing versions :-)
Hmm, I thought one can leave out the
Hi,
I either missed that one or the build log just appeared. Anyways, please
add:
gb hslogger_1.0.9-1 . hppa
dw hslogger_1.0.9-1 . hppa . -m libghc6-network-dev ( 2.2.1.7-1),
libghc6-parsec2-dev ( 2.1.0.1-2)
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org
Hi,
some more giveback/depwaits:
gb haskell-alut_2.1.0.2-2 . powerpc kfreebsd-i386
dw haskell-alut_2.1.0.2-2 . powerpc kfreebsd-i386 . -m libghc6-openal-dev (
1.3.1.3-2), libghc6-opengl-dev ( 2.2.3.0-2)
gb xmonad-contrib . alpha
dw xmonad-contrib . alpha -m libghc6-xmonad-dev (= 0.9.1-2)
gb
Hi,
and more failing build logs are coming in:
gb haskell-http_4006-3 . powerpc alpha kfreebsd-i386
dw haskell-http_4006-3 . powerpc alpha kfreebsd-i386 . -m
libghc6-network-dev ( 2.2.1.7-1), libghc6-parsec2-dev ( 2.1.0.1-2)
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian
Hi,
and yet more failing build logs are coming in:
gb haskell-network-bytestring . powerpc kfreebsd-i386
dp haskell-network-bytestring . alpha powerpc kfreebsd-i386 . -m
libghc6-network-dev ( 2.2.1.7-1), libghc6-parsec2-dev ( 2.1.0.1-2)
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this slipped through the first round of binNMUs:
nmu haskell-ghc-paths_0.1.0.6-1 . amd64 hppa kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m
Rebuild
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the FTBFS with:
HsColour: XXX: hGetContents: invalid argument (Invalid or incomplete
multibyte or wide character)
should be fixed with hscolour-1.16. (Although I don’t quite understand why it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this package was built with a previous version of ghc6 which had issues.
At least this particular issue has been fixed by now, please re-try :-)
gb ldap-haskell . armel
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
hdbc-postgresql 2.2.3.1-1 (s390) was tried with a broken version of
parsec, so please:
gb hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 . s390
dw hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 . s390 . -m libghc6-parsec2-dev ( 2.1.0.1-2)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the current ghc6 compiler is unable to provide working packages on ia64,
and a fix is not in sight. I’d like to remove the ia64 build-failure logs
from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
haskell-cgi has to be built with a fixed haskell-network:
gb haskell-cgi_3001.1.7.1-3 . powerpc s390
dw haskell-cgi_3001.1.7.1-3 . powerpc s390 armel . -m libghc6-network-dev (
2.2.1.7-1)
Thanks,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please schedule
nmu highlighting-kate_0.2.5-4 . i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 . -m
rebuild against changed pcre-light ABI
Hi release team,
although the haskell packages are not really close to a transitional
state yet (armel just built the compiler, mips and mipsel haven’t yet),
I had a look at the haskell packages on
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php. I did not see any surprising
problems, but I was wondering
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
these packages were tried against broken version:
gb arbtt_0.4.5.1-1 . armel
dw arbtt_0.4.5.1-1 . armel . -m libghc6-x11-dev ( 1.5.0.0-2)
gb hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 . armel
dw
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I overlooked this one due to the wrong log displayed by
status/packages.php (see my mail on d-wb-team about that):
gb hdbc-sqlite3_2.3.0.0-1 . armel
dw hdbc-sqlite3_2.3.0.0-1 . armel . -m
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
nmu highlighting-kate_0.2.5-4 . i386 kfreebsd-i386 amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 .
-m rebuild against changed pcre-light ABI
Done. Got lost in the cracks somehow. Do you know
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 06.03.2010, 10:26 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
Am Freitag, den 05.03.2010, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
nmu highlighting-kate_0.2.5-4 . i386 kfreebsd-i386
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
these packages were tried against broken version:
dw haskelldb-hdbc_0.13-1 . -m libghc6-hdbc-dev ( 2.2.3-1),
libghc6-convertible-dev ( 1.0.9-1)
I hope the broken versions will soon be all rebuilt,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have added dep-waits on the binNMUs, but it seems I have never
scheduled these binNMUs:
nmu . haskell-convertible_1.0.9-1 hdbc_2.2.3-1 . armel . -m Rebuild due to
changed base ABI
And a
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
If the package requires too much resources for such an architecture to
build, maybe it’s an indication that these architectures are also a too
weak to use the package
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:42 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
This might be a solution, yes, though I would prefer not to do
this. You've managed to get highlighting-kate's build times down, making
it build everywhere but on armel (where it got tried on a slw
buildd, let's see
Hi,
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:56 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
Am Montag, den 08.03.2010, 22:30 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt:
This might be a solution, yes, though I would prefer not to do
this. You've managed to get
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
when scheduling the binNMUs, I forgot that hdbc depends on convertible -
sorry...
dw hdbc_2.2.3-1 . armel . -m libghc6-convertible-dev ( 1.0.9-1)
Greetings,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I’m sure I made this dep-waits before... anyways, these need to be
retried as well:
dw hdbc-postgresql_2.2.3.1-1 hdbc-odbc_2.2.3.0-1 . armel .-m
libghc6-convertible-dev ( 1.0.9-1), libghc6-hdbc-dev
Hi,
FYI:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gtk2hs
says gtk2hs has the same version in unstable and testing (0.9.13-5),
which is not the case:
$ rmadison gtk2hs
gtk2hs | 0.9.13-5 | testing | source
gtk2hs | 0.9.13-5 | unstable | source
gtk2hs |
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.03.2010, 20:33 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE'
Brockschmidt:
This is the current result of a hint for ghc6 (including some unrelated
packages ready to move testing):
finish:
Hi,
I’m well aware that some haskell packages are quite heavy to build. But
I’m surprised to see hppa fail where arches like armel and mips* cope.
Is there something else broken?
These packages’ build failure on hppa prevent a testing migration:
hlint (hppa, needs haskell-src-exts)
These
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
a new haskell-text was uploaded, please schedule
nmu haskell-hstringtemplate_0.6.2-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new
haskell-text
dw
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo