clone 591174 -1
retitle -1 RM: mlton-cross
reassing -1 debian-release
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags -1 + rm
thanks
Le 31/07/2010 21:45, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
The following packages need to go to testing together:
easy react/0.9.2-1 lwt/2.1.1-1 ocsigen/1.3.3-1 nurpawiki/amd64/1.2.3-4
nurpawiki/armel/1.2.3-4 nurpawiki/hppa/1.2.3-4
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild with ocsigen_1.3.3-1
dw nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m libocsigen-ocaml-dev (= 1.3.3-1)
nmu ocaml-usb_1.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild with lwt_2.1.1-1
dw
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
Please rebuild the following packages with camlp5 5.14:
nmu 2 coq_8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 . ALL . -m Rebuild with camlp5 5.14
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
nmu nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild with ocsigen 1.3.2
dw nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m libocsigen-ocaml-dev (=
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
The following packages need to go to testing together:
easy camlp5/5.13-1
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
The following packages need to go to testing together:
[...]
Sorry, I made a mistake while generating the above line. The correct
hint is:
easy camlp5/5.13-1 coq/amd64/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/armel/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6
coq/hppa/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/i386/8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 coq/ia64
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
nmu 1 coq_8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 . ALL . -m Rebuild with camlp5 5.13
dw coq_8.2.pl1+dfsg-6 . ALL . -m camlp5 (= 5.13-1)
nmu
John Francesco Ferlito a écrit :
nmu ocaml-ao/0.1.10-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new libao
nmu liquidsoap/0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new libao
I guess liquidsoap will need a dep-wait on ocaml-ao for this binNMU to
be effective...
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
easy ocsigen/1.3.0-4 nurpawiki/1.2.3-4
Thanks in advance,
--
Stéphane
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild with ocsigen 1.3.0-3
dw nurpawiki_1.2.3-4 . ALL . -m libocsigen-ocaml-dev (= 1.3.0-3)
Thanks in advance,
--
Stéphane
-- System Information:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
ocaml-text and postgresql-ocaml need to go to testing with a bunch of
other binNMUed packages:
easy ocaml-text/0.3-1 postgresql-ocaml/1.12.4-1 lwt/amd64/2.0.0-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
Following the recent uploads of ocaml-text, postgresql-ocaml and
ocaml-ssl, the following packages must be recompiled:
nmu lwt_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild with new ocaml-text
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I was wondering the other day how big a hint could be :-) Here is a
(not so) easy hint for OCaml transition. Disclaimer: it is
semi-automatically generated, and untested... but
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
nmu 1 matita_0.5.8-2 . alpha armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel s390 . -m 'Recompile
with OCaml 3.11.2'
This one failed everywhere because of a bug in ocaml-expat (#569267) and
gmetadom (#569391). Please reschedule:
nmu 1 matita_0.5.8-2 . alpha armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello release managers,
It seems that galax can be binNMUed:
nmu galax_1.1-6 . ALL . -m Recompile with OCaml 3.11.2
I removed it from the previous request because it was failing with the
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
nmu 1 haxe_20060912-2 . alpha armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel s390 . -m
'Recompile with OCaml 3.11.2'
dw haxe_20060912-2 . alpha armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel s390 . -m 'ocaml (=
3.11.2-1), ocaml-findlib (= 1.2.5+debian-1+b1), libextlib-ocaml-dev (=
1.5.1-5+b1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello release managers,
As promised, here are binNMUs for the OCaml transition:
nmu 2 camlidl_1.05-12 . ALL . -m 'Recompile with OCaml 3.11.2'
dw camlidl_1.05-12 . ALL . -m 'ocaml-nox (=
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
nmu 1 camlpdf_0.4-4 . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 s390 sparc . -m 'Recompile
with OCaml 3.11.2'
dw camlpdf_0.4-4 . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 s390 sparc . -m 'ocaml-nox (=
3.11.2-1), ocaml-findlib (= 1.2.5+debian-1+b1), libzip-ocaml-dev (=
1.04-6+b1), dh-ocaml
Luk Claes a écrit :
[...OCaml 3.11.2 transition...]
Go :-)
I've just uploaded ocaml/3.11.2-1 to unstable. I've updated the
coordination page:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions
I'll request binNMUs when ocaml is built on all architectures.
To other OCaml-related
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
I've recompiled (on amd64) all relevant packages with the release
candidate (announced last Dec 29), and all problems have been sorted
out. As far as I am concerned, I see no objections in starting the
transition.
However, release managers might have objections, so
David MENTRE a écrit :
Immediate questions following Damien's announcement:
* Can I assume that you are going to release new Debian package shortly?
I've recompiled (on amd64) all relevant packages with the release
candidate (announced last Dec 29), and all problems have been sorted
out. As
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu mlpost_0.7.4-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild with new ocaml-bitstring
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'),
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
easy cameleon/1.9.19-2 coq/8.2.pl1+dfsg-4 frama-c/20090901+beryllium+dfsg-2
lablgtk2/2.14.0+dfsg-2 laby/0.5.5-1 matita/0.5.8-2 cairo-ocaml/amd64/20090223-3
cairo-ocaml/armel/20090223-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
easy xmlm/1.0.2-1 ocaml-xmlplaylist/amd64/0.1.2-1
ocaml-xmlplaylist/i386/0.1.2-1 ocaml-xmlplaylist/kfreebsd-amd64/0.1.2-1
ocaml-xmlplaylist/kfreebsd-i386/0.1.2-1
Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
Both packages also have binNMUs on powerpc that need adding to the hint
(the ocaml-lastfm binNMU is built but not yet uploaded); I've added the
hint, including powerpc.
You're right. I was thinking very hard about them, but somehow forgot
them in my bugreport.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu 1 ocaml-xmlplaylist_0.1.2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild with xmlm/1.0.2-1
nmu ocaml-lastfm_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild with xmlm/1.0.2-1
dw ocaml-lastfm_0.2.0-1 . ALL . -m libxmlplaylist-ocaml-dev
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu camlimages_1:3.0.1-5 . ALL . -m rebuild with lablgtk2/2.14.0+dfsg-2
dw camlimages_1:3.0.1-5 . ALL . -m liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev (= 2.14.0+dfsg-2)
nmu ocamlnet_2.2.9-7 . ALL . -m rebuild
Hello,
I'd like to upload lablgtk2 (OCaml bindings to GTK/Gnome stuff) v2.14 to
unstable soon. It has been in experimental for a while.
The main change is the drop of gtksourceview bindings (in favour of
gtksourceview2). All reverse-dependencies have been adapted AFAIK
(except frama-c, maybe,
Josselin Mouette a écrit :
now that lablgtk2 supports gtksourceview 2.x, could you please port
matita and frama-c to the new version? These are the last two packages
to use it.
I’m going to request the removal of gtksourceview 1.x soon nevertheless,
so this would make matita and frama-c
Jay Berkenbilt a écrit :
Please disregard. I figured it out. I'm going to upload 3.9.0 to
unstable, which will work fine because it's newer than 3.8.2. I'll
upload 4.0.0beta3 to experimental which will clear out 3.9.0beta+deb1.
You can also just ask ftpmaster to remove (via a bugreport
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
Please schedule the attached requests for OCaml 3.11.1 transition.
[...]
I forgot the following one:
nmu 1 gmetadom_0.2.6-3 . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel
powerpc s390 sparc . -m 'Recompile with OCaml 3.11.1'
Moreover:
nmu otags_3.09.3-3 . alpha . -m
[ please keep the Cc to d-o-m ]
Hi releasers,
A new upstream version of OCaml has been released, and our team is ready
to start the transition to this new version.
We plan to go ahead and upload ocaml 3.11.1 itself (the package) very
soon. As usual, this will break (almost) all OCaml-related
Hello,
nmu ocsigen_1.1.0-2 . ALL . -m 'Recompile with ocaml-sqlite3 1.4.0'
This would close #527224.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Adeodato Simó a écrit :
Please schedule the attached requests for the OCaml 3.11.0 transition.
Scheduled, with the glitches noted below. Please get back to us with the
needed wanna-build actions.
All packages that needed recompilation or sourceful uploads for the
OCaml 3.11.0 transition are
Hello,
Please schedule the attached requests for the OCaml 3.11.0 transition.
Thanks in advance,
--
Stéphane
nmu 3 confluence_0.10.6-5 . alpha armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel s390 . -m
'Recompile with OCaml 3.11.0'
dw confluence_0.10.6-5 . alpha armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel s390 . -m 'ocaml-nox
to understand the FTBFSes of lablgtk2 on powerpc and s390...
isn't there something wrong with the build daemons?
Thanks in advance,
--
Stéphane Glondu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
[ can we upload OCaml 3.11 to unstable? ]
I can see that pcre3 is blocking a lot of packages in unstable from
migrating to testing (including OCaml-related ones). I think we should
at least wait for this transition to complete.
Any hints on when this will be done?
[sorry for coming after the battle]
Luk Claes wrote:
t-p-u is a workaround so should only be used if unstable is no option.
So if posssible, please use use unstable.
Actually, there might be a problem because of libpcre3...
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Adeodato Simó a écrit :
The ocsigen package was affected by this bug. Please schedule a binNMU
for it on all architectures:
ocsigen_1.1.0-1, Rebuild against ocaml-ssl/0.4.2-4, 1, alpha amd64 arm
armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
ocsigen dep-wait ocaml-ssl (= 0.4.2-4)
/0.4.2-4, 1, alpha amd64 arm
armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
ocsigen dep-wait ocaml-ssl (= 0.4.2-4)
Thanks,
--
Stéphane Glondu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
The new release of ocaml-sqlite3 (1.2.0) invalidates some interfaces
that are used by ocsigen. Therefore, ocsigen must be rebuilt against
this new version.
ocsigen_1.0.0-1, Rebuild with ocaml-sqlite3 1.2.0, 2, alpha amd64 arm
armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel
Adeodato Simó a écrit :
I guess, then, that we can get away with the binNMU this time, but if
ocaml-sqlite3 changes again, a Conflicts against ocsigen would be
appropriate, could you take care of that, if the day arrives?
I will.
binNMU scheduled, anyway.
Thank you!
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
may want to
change the port in /etc/ocsigen/ocsigen.conf (80 by default). If there
is no suspicious error message (especially concerning sqlite3), it
should be ok.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane Glondu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-sqlite3 1.2.0, 2, alpha amd64 arm
armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
ocsigen dep-wait libsqlite3-ocaml-dev (= 1.2.0-1)
Thanks,
--
Stéphane Glondu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
