Bug#947038: buster-pu: package libburn/1.5.0-1

2019-12-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi folks, We'd like to add a stable update for libburn to fix an important bug in cdrskin. 1.5.0-1 (currently in Buster) currently can't burn multi-track audio CDs correctly and

Re: Scheduling 10.2

2019-10-22 Thread Steve McIntyre
I'm not available; also means that the freeze would have to be this Andy are are both away that weekend, so difficult for the images team. >coming weekend >- November 9th >- November 16th Both OK. >- November 23rd Both busy that Saturday >- November 30th Wor

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
! > - Auguest 31st > - September 7th Either of these would work for me. >We also have a point release of 9.10 to fit in some time - would the same >day or adjacent weekends be preferable? Happy to do a double-header again. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Bug#931176: unblock: debian-cd/3.1.25

2019-06-27 Thread Steve McIntyre
"left"} #ifdef MENU1 + label {text = " " font = "Sans 10" color = "white" align = "left"} + label {text = "Esc: " font = "Sans 10" color = "white" align = "left"} -+ label {text = &quo

Bug#931064: unblock: grub2/2.02+dfsg1-20

2019-06-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
; urgency=medium + + [ Steve McIntyre ] + * Make all the signed EFI arches have a Recommends: from +grub-efi-ARCH-signed to shim-signed, not just amd64. +Closes: #931038 + * Add myself to Uploaders + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:11:12 +0100 + grub2

Bug#928185: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.3+7-4

2019-06-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
ve been disk issues reported on one of the new machines (yay!), possibly that's the cause here. I don't have direct login access myself to be able to check. Aurelien - could you take a look please? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com < Aardv

Bug#929724: unblock: shim-signed/1.33 (was Re: unblock: shim-signed/1.32)

2019-06-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
showed I made a daft mistake with the 1.31 upload. :-( This package fixes our one outstanding RC bug in version 1.30 (#928107), which was impossible to fix until now. debdiff attached. unblock shim-signed/1.33 -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com We don't

Bug#929724: unblock: shim-signed/1.32

2019-05-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
:54.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,27 @@ +shim-signed (1.32) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Add Breaks/Replaces to shim-signed-common for +update-secureboot-policy etc. Closes: #929673 + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Tue, 28 May 2019 14:23:54 +0100 + +shim-signed (1.31) unstable; urgency=

Bug#928676: unblock: pesign/0.112-5

2019-05-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi! Forgot to add - please *also* urgent this - it will be holding us up on submitting shim for review. Sorry... Steve On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:31:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Package: release.debian.org >Severity: normal >User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >Usert

Bug#928676: unblock: pesign/0.112-5

2019-05-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
(Closes: #928491) + * Update obsolete Build-Depends (remove dh-systemd, update debhelper) + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Sun, 05 May 2019 21:22:21 +0100 + pesign (0.112-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff -Nru pesign-0.112/debian/control pesign-0.112/debian/c

Bug#927816: unblock: shim-signed/1.30

2019-04-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 07:41:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >Control: tags -1 moreinfo > >Steve McIntyre: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >>

Bug#927816: unblock: shim-signed/1.30

2019-04-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,62 @@ +shim-signed (1.30) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Force the built-using version to be 15+1533136590.3beb971-6. That +*does* match the source we've used, we're only using -5 due to +toolchain changes elsewhere. Ick :-( + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> T

Bug#927464: unblock: sbsigntool/0.9.2-2

2019-04-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
checksum calculation - only count the cert_table +struct once when performing the calculation and counting buffer +sizes. + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Fri, 19 Apr 2019 23:41:15 +0200 + sbsigntool (0.9.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Add watch file diff -Nru sbsigntool

Bug#925436: unblock: fwupdate/12-4

2019-03-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
+0100 +++ fwupdate-12/debian/changelog2019-03-25 00:47:29.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +fwupdate (12-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Steve McIntyre ] + * debian/gen_signing_json: Update the format of the json metadata to +match new requirements: ++ Move all the data under a new

Bug#925435: unblock: fwupd/1.2.5-2

2019-03-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
: Update the format of the json metadata to +match new requirements: ++ Move all the data under a new top-level "packages" key ++ Add an empty "trusted_certs" key - our binaries do not do any + further verification with an embedded key. + + -- Steve McIntyre <

Bug#925372: unblock: shim/15+1533136590.3beb971-6

2019-03-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
=medium + + [ Steve McIntyre ] + * Add Provides: and Breaks: to shim-helpers-$arch-signed to fix +clashes with the old shim-signed package for fbx64.efi.signed and +mmx64.efi.signed. Closes: #924619 + + [ Helmut Grohne ] + * Fix FTCBFS: Set CROSS_COMPILE. (Closes: #922152) + + -- Steve

Bug#925007: unblock: lavacli/0.9.5-1

2019-03-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
job definitions ++ Allow fallback to yaml.Loader ++ Create config dir if it doesn't exist + * Fix Uploaders: add me, remove Senthil + * Moved Debian packaging into the upstream repo, so update the VCS- +links to point there + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Tue, 05 Mar 2019 17:09

Re: Problems with shim and shim-signed in unstable, and proposed solutions to unblock us

2019-03-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:30:46PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>3. Upload new version of the shim-signed source package and a >> (lightly) bodged binary package >>3a. Use versions: >> - source: 1.28+nmu2 >> - binary

Re: Problems with shim and shim-signed in unstable, and proposed solutions to unblock us

2019-03-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
I've had a reply from Mark (ftpteam) in IRC: On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:35:45PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: ... >So, we're looking at three hacky options options here to work our way >out of this hole. In (probably?) descending order of hackitude: > >1. Ask the nice ftpm

Problems with shim and shim-signed in unstable, and proposed solutions to unblock us

2019-03-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
, please - what do you think? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Gar

Re: Scheduling 9.9

2019-02-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:28:05PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >Please indicate your availablility out of: > > - April 13 > - April 20 (Easter weekend) I'm away on holiday for both of these, I'm afraid, and so is chief CD tester Andy. > - April 27 But this works

Re: Updated Debian 9: 9.8 released

2019-02-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
separately and are referenced where available. > >Has the release been finished completely or is some processing still >going on in the background? > >I'm asking because I'm missing the GPG-signatures for the ${hash}SUMS >files at e.g. > >https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/

Re: Scheduling 9.7

2019-01-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
currently look free for me. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, h

Rebuilding the entire Debian archive twice on arm64 hardware for fun and proft

2019-01-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
esults here. I still have my machines set up for easy rebuilds, so reproducing things and testing fixes is quite easy - just ask! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline,

BSP in Cambridge, UK, 9th-10th March 2019

2018-12-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
do Buster! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty characters." -- Ignatios Souvatzis sig

Bug#913229: release.debian.org: RC status of merged-/usr bugs?

2018-11-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
that building locally is still supported. > >this is an important, unfixed bug. for upload to the archive, agreed. However, we still support people building packages for their own use, of course. And they shouldn't fail unexpectedly due to merged-/usr. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Bug#912853: transition: icu

2018-11-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 05:01:58PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: >>Hey Steve, >> >>Missatge de Steve McIntyre del dia dc., 14 de nov. >>2018 a les 17:11: >> >>> Digging further and install

Bug#912853: transition: icu

2018-11-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 05:52:30PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: >Hey Steve, > >Missatge de Steve McIntyre del dia dc., 14 de nov. >2018 a les 17:11: > >> Digging further and installing some debug symbols, I get to a problem >> in libfreetype6: >> >> (si

Bug#912853: transition: icu

2018-11-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
0x006fa8a8 in main (argc=7, argv=0xff864964) at ../../util/hb-shape.cc:192 (gdb) p a $1 = (FT_Var_Axis *) 0x1c67512 (gdb) p *a $2 = {name = 0x1c6758a "UPWD", minimum = 0, def = 0, maximum = 22937600, tag = 1431328580, strid = 256} Whether that's a bug in freetype or in th

Re: Scheduling 9.6

2018-10-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 05:24:47PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 08:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:29:22PM +0800, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:20:57PM +0800, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> > &

Re: Scheduling 9.6

2018-07-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
try for 28th September, and meanwhile we >> have schemed to fix the CD SPOF :) > >Um, that's Saturday 29th Sept of course. Debconf beer gd As mentioned to Jonathan IRL at DC18, that works better for me. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com There's no sensation to compare with this Suspended animation, A state of bliss

Re: Scheduling 9.6

2018-07-27 Thread Steve McIntyre
; - Sept 22nd Apologies, none of those work for me. I'm off to Vancouver for a VAC then conference trip, away all 3 weekends. :-/ -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I suspect most samba developers are already technically insane... O

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:22:36AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 07:27:15AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>... >> The next big problem I can see is in our haskell packages for >> armhf. From my build log for haskell-zxcvbn-c_1.0.1-4.

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
etup building armel on arm64, perhaps on the same arm-arm-01. Possibly. Let's see how things go - I'm looking at sourcing many more machines too... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Das Mohapatra

Arm ports build machines (was Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns)

2018-06-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
/ [2] https://www.cnx-software.com/2017/09/24/gigabyte-synquacer-96boards-enterprise-platform-is-powered-by-socionext-sc2a11-24-core-armv8-soc/) [3] https://www.qualcomm.com/products/qualcomm-centriq-2400-processor [4] https://www.cavium.com/product-thunderx2-arm-processors.html [5] http://open-estua

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
s for 9.5, we know that June 30th is a no-go, Debcamp >starts on July 21st and then Debconf on the 28th. So that leaves us with: > >- July 7th >- July 14th > >Are people available for either or both of those dates? Both look good for me, yup. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-06-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
uation for a >short while, or do 9.5 before 8.11. In practical terms, that would >likely mean both 9.5 and 8.11 on June 23rd, freezing both next weekend. >How do people feel about that? That works ok for me. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "This dress doesn't reverse." -- Alden Spiess

Re: Scheduling 9.5

2018-05-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
nd (which may require an unusual SRM) Works for me. > - Jun 9th (getting quite a way out of cadence, but maybe that can't be > helped) Nope, away on VAC. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Arguing that you don't care about the right to p

Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11

2018-05-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
Looks possible. > - (30th Jun I already know is impossible, for the sake of completeness) ACK :-) > - 7th July Looks possible. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop" -- Vivek Das Mohapatra

Re: Scheduling 9.4

2018-02-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
4 I'm away at a conference 15-25, so no for me. >- March 31 Likely to be awkward, with a big family celebration that weekend. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control.

Re: Scheduling 9.3

2017-11-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
avoiding the >> festive >> season). >> >> Accordingly I'm looking at one of: >[...] >> 2nd December >> 9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending >> the cycle) > >Those both look ok to me. Did we make a d

Bug#879215: stretch-pu: package live-config/5.20170112

2017-10-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
debian/changelog2017-01-12 18:11:22.0 >+0100 >+++ live-config-5.20170112+deb9u1/debian/changelog 2017-10-20 >16:53:40.0 +0200 >@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ >+live-config (5.20170112+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium >+ >+ [ Cyril Brulebois ] >+ * Cherry-pick the change below to improve KDE live images. >+ >+ [ Алексей Шилин ] >+ * Add components/0085-sddm to configure autologin for KDE / Plasma live >+images. Closes: #865382. >+ >+ -- Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:53:40 +0200 >+ > live-config (5.20170112) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Team upload. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine.

Re: Bug#878178: cdimage.debian.org: Debian 9.2.0 and 9.2.0-live images built with base-files 9.9+deb9u1

2017-10-10 Thread Steve McIntyre
ss that this was due to 9.9+deb9u2 being accepted >into proposed-updates on Oct 7, 2017. Correct - the base-files update didn't make it in before the 9.2 point release. The releas team decided to press on rather than re-spin the release. The installation and live media builds reflect that. --

Re: Scheduling 9.3

2017-09-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
> >25th November >2nd December >9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending > the cycle) > >Please advise your availability. The 25th is really difficult with the Cambridge mini-debconf that weekend, but the other two should b

Re: Scheduling 9.2

2017-09-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >I'm working on dates for 9.2; by a two

Re: Scheduling 9.2

2017-08-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
t a month >3 to try and fit in betweens. So every other stable update will also be an >oldstable. WFM. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Who needs computer imagery when you've got Brian Blessed?

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-07-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
e should work for me. Working out which is currently blocking >on other people. :| Can we get a decision please? Summer weekends are busy... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
uly >22/23 July Both look fine for me. I'm happy to do 8.9 on the same weekend, but media will take a short while to come out after 9.1. The first point release always throws up surprises IME... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Argu

Re: Preparation for d-i RC5?

2017-06-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:42:39AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Hello, > >Could we have an unblock for installation-guide=20170607 to be in d-i >RC5, to be uploaded soon? Ummm. Are we *doing* an RC5? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com

Bug#864284: unblock: debian-cd/3.1.20

2017-06-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hey folks, Please unblock package debian-cd. This is the traditional late-in-the-cycle upload so that the code we're using for the release is also in the archive. While the diffstat *may*

Bug#862941: binNMUs needed for multiple arm64 packages (#850814)

2017-05-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hey folks, As first discussed a while back, we've had a bug in gold which caused some broken builds of some arm64 packages. These were mostly in backports, with a few example in the early

Re: update for release notes

2017-04-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:44:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >Steve McIntyre: >> Tried to commit this directly, but permission problems. I guess I >> don't have write access? >> >> [...] > >Thanks, I have applied it. > >For commit access, you need to t

update for release notes

2017-04-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
large set of +CDs for each architecture, but with the +release these have been dropped. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt

Re: 8.8 planning

2017-03-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
;I know at least Adam can't do 15-16 so that one is most likely out anyway. All are doable for me, but there's other engagements on April 8-9 and April 29-30 that might slow me down with CD build and test. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einv

Bug#854651: unblock: debootstrap/1.0.88

2017-02-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
+++ debootstrap-1.0.88/debian/changelog 2017-02-08 23:52:56.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +debootstrap (1.0.88) unstable; urgency=high + + [ Sven Joachim ] + * Strip the arch-qualifier (Closes: #836525) + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Wed, 08 Feb 2017 23:53:10 + + debootstrap (

Bug#851151: jessie-pu: package binutils/2.25-5+deb8u1.1

2017-01-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 05:01:36PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >Control: tags -1 + confirmed > >On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 13:23 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Binutils in jessie is building (some) broken packages on arm64, >> particularly those using gold. See #850814 fo

Re: Missing live images

2017-01-16 Thread Steve McIntyre
someone knows of a >better destination, please forward this message :-) Thanks for reporting. There was a bug in live-build whic caused a silent failure, hence these were missed. I'll rebuild shortly to fix this. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com

Bug#851151: jessie-pu: package binutils/2.25-5+deb8u1.1

2017-01-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:23:39PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Package: release.debian.org >Severity: normal >Tags: jessie >User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >Usertags: pu > >Hi folks, > >Binutils in jessie is building (some) broken packages on arm64, >

Bug#851151: jessie-pu: package binutils/2.25-5+deb8u1.1

2017-01-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
patch from upstream to fix gold on arm64. The ABI specifies +using a pagesize of 64k for ELF binaries. + + -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org> Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:36:22 + + binutils (2.25-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove '*.rej' files in the source package. Closes: #775679

Re: 8.7 planning

2016-12-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
e BSP, probably not ideal > >Feb 4th/5th - FOSDEM, probably not great either > >Feb 11th/12th I'm OK with any of the dates apart from the two you've already flagged. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I've only once written 'SQL

BSP in Cambridge, UK, 27th-29th January 2017

2016-11-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
. Let's do Stretch! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Architecture qualification meeting

2016-10-30 Thread Steve McIntyre
n from you. > >(With apologies for the short notice.) Crap. I know I said I could make it, but at short notice a family thing has just come up and I probably won't be around today. :-( -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I used to be the

Re: Next d-i release

2016-10-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:05:25AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> (2016-10-20): >> >Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare >> >a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming >>

Re: Next d-i release

2016-10-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
strap in before the release. Nothing else really comes to mind right now. Once this release is done, I'd like to get the jessie update images done. I think I'm there with the changes I need, but it needs: * a little more testing * d-i in backports * a list of packages to pull from backports --

Re: [Artwork] Survey for the default artwork for Stretch

2016-10-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
nly once! Awesome stuff Laura. :-) I've just voted (once)! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com The two hard things in computing: * naming things * cache invalidation * off-by-one errors -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-09-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
first quick-hack attempt failed dismally, so I'm midway down a more disruptive but thorough set of changes now. Once that's working, I'll ask on -devel again for package lists. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I used to be the first kid on the block wanting a cranial implant, now I want to be the first with a cranial firewall. " -- Charlie Stross

Re: 8.6 planning

2016-08-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
e. > >We seem to have converged on these two. The 10th is doable, but means >freezing over the coming weekend and I'm not sure how much time I'll >have between now and then, so I'm tempted to opt for the 17th and get >the announcement out ASAP. > >Last minute comments, thoughts

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-08-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
effect we expect is a small performance impact. If anything more crops up, we have expert help available. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Because heaters aren't purple!" -- Catherine Pitt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: 8.6 planning

2016-08-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
t;August 27th/28th - public holiday weekend in the UK; doesn't work for me Both those weekends don't work for me either, for the same reasons as you. :-) >September 3rd/4th > >September 10th/11th > >September 17th/18th But all three of those work fine for me. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambri

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 07:33:38AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: >On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 11:43:14PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >I assume "forking" the kernel for jessie+½ as done for etch-and-half is >> >the plan already? (forking as in using a new sourc

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
eople using this and updating will end up following bpo for a while until the Stretch release. >(Probably related to the remark that jessie+½ might become obsolete by >stretch quite soon after too… related as in: what will be the next >upstream LTS kernel?) > > >-- >cheers, >

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 04:15:36PM -0300, Breno Leitao wrote: >Steve, > >On 07/04/2016 10:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners >>of very recent amd64 machines too. > >ppc64el port would take benefit from

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 02:37:06PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >Hi Steve, > >On Mon Jul 04, 2016 at 14:01:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> A lot of arm64 machine users would benefit from this, and maybe owners >> of very recent amd64 machines too, with bett

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 07:05:42PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: >On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some >> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie a

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
I'm more concerned about easy installation on new "client" x86 machines at this point, and for arm64 machines in general as they've seen massive changes since we released jessie. I don't think x86 server machines are such an issue, but I'm open-minded if somebody wants to argue otherwise. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:12:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> (2016-07-04): >> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some >> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half"

Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
ith better support for things on the Skylake platform. Those are the only two architectures I'm thinking of supporting at this point. Is anybody else interested in helping? Thoughts/comments? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Welcome my so

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:38:06AM -0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> [2016-06-06 15:14]: >> However, I will admit (again) that armel is starting to lose upstream >> support in some cases. I'm tempted to suggest that Stretch should be >>

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:39:46PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >Steve McIntyre: >> [...] >>>>> - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2) >>>>> >>>> I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are >&

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
body needs to start working on it. FTAOD: I'm *not* volunteering for that work myself - I can see a number of pros and cons, but I've already got more on my plate than I need right now... :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "The problem with defending

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
achines in the US (on permanent loan from Linaro), 2 >Juno machines at ARM Cambridge and 1 AMD Seattle (proper server-grade >box) machine at ARM, which sledge just installed in the rack - it may >well not actually be in service yet? s/just installed/is about to install/ - I've been wa

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-06 Thread Steve McIntyre
ame on the armhf page. > >Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures? Correct. We'll also have the possibility of arm64 machines building armhf at some point - arm64 server machines are starting to appear and are much better designed for this kind of workload. -- Steve McIntyre

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

2016-05-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
th on the >same Saturday again. > >Some suggested dates: > >June 4th/5th >June 11th/12th >June 18th/19th Any of these should be fine. >June 25th/26th I *could* do this at a push, but I'll be on the plane to South Africa on the 25th so CDs would be late.

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

2016-02-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
gt; > >March 12th / 13th not a chance for me, I'll be on a plane back from a conf in Thailand. >March 19th / 20th fine >March 26th / 27th (probably) fine >April 2nd / 3rd fine -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Since phone messag

Re: BSP in Cambridge?

2016-01-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:57:39PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:22:01PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>Hey folks, >> >>Let's have another Buq Squashing Party at my place. One of the >>weekends in February sounds like a good option to me - pl

Re: BSP in Cambridge?

2016-01-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:22:01PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hey folks, > >Let's have another Buq Squashing Party at my place. One of the >weekends in February sounds like a good option to me - please tell us >when you can make in the Doodle poll at > >h

BSP in Cambridge?

2016-01-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey folks, Let's have another Buq Squashing Party at my place. One of the weekends in February sounds like a good option to me - please tell us when you can make in the Doodle poll at http://doodle.com/poll/4g5n6iquwqmfwyfg and I'll pick a date in the next week or so... -- Steve McIntyre

Re: Fixing the armhf linker path

2015-12-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:04:47AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>At the beginning of the armhf port the hard-float dynamic linker has >>been chosen to be '/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/ld-linux.so.3'. However it >>

Re: Fixing the armhf linker path

2015-12-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
f them >migrated to testing. > >Any comments or objections? ACK, this makes sense. I spoke with Adam a while back about doing this. I promised I'd scan the archive for any packages still relying on the old linker path, but I've not got to it yet - sorry. :-/ -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridg

Re: Tentative last d-i release for 2015?

2015-12-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
gs are in shape >somewhat, and if image builds can be performed, then maybe… Would debian-cd >people be available say next week-end (2015-12-19/20)? Sure, shouldn't be a problem. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Support the Campaign for Audiovisual

Re: 8.3 planning

2015-12-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
d - depends how much people are still suffering. :-) No chance for me that weekend - I've got plans already. >9th/10th >16th/17th >23rd/24th - likely to be bad for me All of these look OK so far. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "

Re: Towards D-I Stretch Alpha 4

2015-10-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 08:38:32PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi again, > >Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> (2015-10-08): >> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 05:14:17AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > I've just pushed a patch in D-I bumping the linux kernel ABI for t

Re: Towards D-I Stretch Alpha 4

2015-10-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
;or wisdom). OK. I would like to disable the CD set builds properly again - I'm just about to commit that change again now. OK? After the DC15 discussion and follow-up on the list I think I'll leave *one* CD1 option around, XFCE. How does that sound? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

2015-08-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
on the 12th, but 13th looks fine. 19th/20th - looks okay Bad for me - I'm flying to the US for a work trip on the 20th. 26th/27th - looks okay I'll be back on the 26th, but in a zombie state. Can work, but images will be a little more delayed than normal maybe. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

2015-05-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
have some packages for which pu opu stable. Suggested dates (all of which appear to be okay for me currently): May 23/24 Not good for me - already have big plans that weekend. May 30/31 June 6/7 June 13/14 All OK. June 20/21 Definitely not for me - on VAC abroad that weekend. -- Steve

Re: kFreeBSD CD/DVD builds for Jessie

2015-04-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:24:14PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Hi Steve, Steve McIntyre wrote: I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released [1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases? I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-cd

Bug#783001: unblock: debian-cd/3.1.17

2015-04-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-cd Hi folks, It's time for the traditional late debian-cd upload so we have the current scripts in sync with the package in the archive ready for release.

kFreeBSD CD/DVD builds for Jessie

2015-04-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/11/msg5.html -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com I can't ever sleep on planes ... call it irrational if you like, but I'm afraid I'll miss my stop -- Vivek Dasmohapatra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#780605: unblock: abcde/2.6-2

2015-03-16 Thread Steve McIntyre
and uses the right set of +options. Closes: #776908 + + -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:36:34 +0930 + abcde (2.6-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload.

Bug#780611: unblock: fake-hwclock/0.9

2015-03-16 Thread Steve McIntyre
-16 17:05:35.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +fake-hwclock (0.9) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Ensure fake-hwclock runs at shutdown on systemd systems too. +Closes: #779040. Thanks again to Alexandre Detiste for the patch. + * Add more rationale in the man page. + + -- Steve McIntyre 93

<    1   2   3   4   >