them by generating work for many people and potentially
new upgrade problems for everyone – or if we declare them, existing or
not, a non-issue at least for the upgrade to trixie.
And on a sidenote: I would advise to reconsider interacting with dpkg
too casually – but luck is probably on your side in any case.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
exhibit the
required setup).
(I will write another mail in another subthread about the finer details
of what interacting with dpkg in an upgrade means and what might be
problematic if you aren't careful – in general, not just with aliasing)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nything about it in src:apt
code wise, but I think we should at least fix the documentation to give
users a helping hand with these transitions.
Thanks for considering:
unblock apt-transport-tor/0.5
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
¹ I would offer points regardless, but I don't want t
ain knowledge' is involved as we wouldn't be
talking if libssl-dev would be a new mail-transport-agent. It would be
perfectly clear that it must conflict with the others even if there is
no technical reason for it given that the other mail-transport-agents
already conflict with it.
Best regards
Da
f out of the way first and deal
with these minor things later. We^WJulian will do as you prefer. ;P
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to be honest).
The patch is attached there and as one-liney and 'safe' as the rest of
this bundle is supposed to be…
Thanks and best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks for considering an:
unblock apt/1.0.9.8
and best regards
David Kalnischkies (for the APT team)
commit d5cf8851753dde4f45bfd3b48fcdf34247a8752a
Author: David Kalnischkies da...@kalnischkies.de
Date: Tue Apr 7 22:34:34 2015 +0200
keyids in apt-key del should be case-insensitive
through it managed to stay below the radar for months. The
regression potential is again non-existent, mostly because this fixes
a regression and back then this behaviour worked, it worked for ages.
Attached as usual 'git log -p' of the involved commits.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
commit
on the response side again,
too, in case you have any concerns; otherwise I hope you enjoy the
upload as much as I do (thanks Michael!) and honor us with a:
unblock apt/1.0.9.5
Best regards happy package management days
David Kalnischkies
commit e5ef23145f0dc6523a5c5321a21407c955777ad2
Author: James
, e.g.:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/log/
Thanks best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to the trigger change in dpkg: Nobody commented further, so
I feel only half as bad for not having done much about it, but that will
surely need quite some changes, so if this isn't magically going forward
soon I would post-prune that to 1.0.9.5 for now – just so you know.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
it is just to return the favor. ;)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
regards
David Kalnischkies
[0] I don't want to sound bitter or throw dirt, but it feels kinda ironic
that apt is punished for providing a workinprogress shared library for
its dependencies while other tools do not to be more free in what they
can do, while being a pain for their dependencies
it is better to have multiple small compared to one giant blob).
unblock apt/0.9.7.6
Thanks for watching best regards
David Kalnischkies
apt-unblock-0.9.7.6.diff
Description: Binary data
anymore as far as I know,
so the command is a bit more useful for them than it is for us here)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Daniel, I noticed that you haven't CC the unblock requests to the
aptitude-devel@ list, you might want to do that so it is easier to follow
what is happening
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
David Kalnischkies, le Thu 30 Aug 2012 19:43:21 +0200, a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org wrote:
We could add a switch to apt-cdrom to copy all configured locales for
d-i
OR files in /var/lib/apt/lists
(and C.UTF-8 and POSIX, right?)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAAZ6_fA7=mywjygduhnh0
- good to know that at least sometimes theory isn't disproved by
the implementation. :)
Scheduled for 0.9.7.5
ETA: After we know what will happen with 0.9.7.4 (#685155)
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
by this.
The very same config option used since ever to disable the download of
Translation files is still supported. In a way, it is even better supported
as you have the option of getting right of -en, too, saving even more MB.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
a recommends, okay?
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/caaz6_fbarunnd6olmrleamds95sujrtm5v9vavk3vsgr3ro...@mail.gmail.com
of course (just keep deity@ cc'ed please).
unblock apt/0.9.7.4
Thanks for your work best regards
David Kalnischkies
unblock-apt-0.9.7.4.diff
Description: Binary data
also the problem that the documentation uses in various
places the release codenames as examples [as the usage of the suite is
potentially dangerous] and while we have a central place to switch the names
we would need to know them first …)
Thanks for your work best regards
David
fixmes,
so it's more of a proof of concept to get the ball rolling…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies, who wanted to send that months ago…
P.S.: I am not subscribed to release-lists, so feel free to cc me. Thanks.
diff -ru debian-archive-keyring-2011.10.23/debian/changelog debian-archive-keyring
uncompress Packages
files and co but use them directly: Saves space, decreases performance).
Further more the method is used to check that the size of a file is not zero
in various places, so we have just luck that zero is the same everywhere…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
strings - we could
remove this, but as one of the strings is the usage message of apt-get
(which had only a line-addition) we figured that it should be okay to
fix this as well, but we can revert this if you want.
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
[0]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 21:07, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 19:58 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
Potential in this regard as it is save as long as only one section
is worked on in the apt-ftparchive generate run but as soon as
multiple sections
2010/9/13 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
On 06.09.2010 22:54, David Kalnischkies wrote:
A question which i have in mind since i read that the mentioned
packages are not compatible as they are in different namespaces:
Is this breaks just here to remove the package from the system?
If so
Hi all,
2010/9/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 14:35:39 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
As for hal-cups-utils, I’ve uploaded the fixed meta-gnome2, which has
been sitting in the SVN all the while.
Looks like that helped, I now get:
[snip]
(Julien and I had
2010/8/27 Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 17:29:43 (CEST), David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/8/26 Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de:
I'm still waiting for an answer on this question. Is this issue solved
with the latest upload, or do you prefer me to upload
place bets on the possibility that it will break…)
We can consider this after squeeze then we have ~2 years of
testing before shipping it…
Best regards
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
it would mean that debian-archive-keyring doesn't need gpg
to install the keyring in APT and APT just needs gpgv for apt-secure
dropping gnupg from important (at least in APTs dependency chain)…
Best regards,
David Kalnischkies
P.S.: Michael and I will try to be online at the releaseteam-meeting
is welcomed)
I also want to emphasis that this is an ABI break - not an API
break, so in an ideal world all rdepends just need to be rebuild.
I tried this in the past weeks a few times with the bigger users²
and so far everything builds and works as expected.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David
- it is more
likely that it will eat your kids in an unwatched moment…
but it is hopefully possible to get at least the overall idea.
Best regads / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
are obviously still welcomed.
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
David Kalnischkies
[0]
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~donkult/apt/sid/annotate/head%3A/README.MultiArch
[1] http://bzr.debian.org/loggerhead/apt/apt/debian-sid/revision/1875.1.47
[2] http://lists.debian.org/deity/2009/08/msg00112.html
34 matches
Mail list logo
