On 2015-04-29 18:45:56, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
Hi,
On 16:37 Wed 29 Apr , Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Unstable and stable currently have the same version of ganeti; as a
rule of
thumb, unless there's a really good reason then we always want fixes to have
been proven in unstable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ganeti
Hi release team,
I would kindly ask you to unblock the ganeti package. As upstream, we
have released version 2.5.2 especially to fix the outstanding issues
Hi,
I send this exception request a bit in advance, since all bugs were
opened and known from before the freeze, and I'd like to know if we can
still fix them in Wheezy; due to lack of time I wasn't able to prepare
all in time. Sorry!
By next weekend, once we sort a bug upstream, I would like to
been tested for the updated package.
It's a long time since I did a stable fix, so I might have gotten the
distribution or the versioning wrong; please let me know!
regards,
iustin
From a1ff159ddfdc99b953428e032e335cba8030827b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org
Date: Sat
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:10:23PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:49 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
I would like to upload a fixed ganeti package in order to close #613648
(very stupid bug, sorry). Attached are the proposed changes, as
formatted with git format-patch
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:11:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 16:03 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:10:23PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 14:49 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
I would like to upload a fixed ganeti package
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:08:59 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:54:01PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to upload version 0.9-2 which fixes #596009 and a
so-far-unreported bug. The ganeti
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:54:01PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to upload version 0.9-2 which fixes #596009 and a
so-far-unreported bug. The ganeti-instance-debootstrap package contains
an OS definition for the Ganeti virtualization manager.
[…]
Kind and hopefully non-intrusive
Xen PVM console issues (Closes: #596009)
+ * Add a hook to set the root account to no password, to allow the
+initial login to proceed
+ * Standards version 3.9.1 (replace Conflicts with Breaks)
+
+ -- Iustin Pop ius...@debian.org Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:58:52 +0200
+
ganeti-instance-debootstrap
Hi all,
I did a NMU and a QA upload two weeks ago, both fixing an RC bug, and
today I wanted to send the request for unblocking these.
However—lo and behold—both were unblocked over the weekend. Was this an
automatic unblock, because RC bugs were fixed, or a manual one? I'm just
curious, to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:05:10PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:27:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Iustin,
sorry for not coming back to you earlier.
Not a problem, I was on vacation :)
On 08/07/2010 12:36 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
Oh, these are old conflicts
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:27:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Iustin,
sorry for not coming back to you earlier.
Not a problem, I was on vacation :)
On 08/07/2010 12:36 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
Oh, these are old conflicts from etch (IIRC) from when the python policy
was to generate separate
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:49:47PM -0400, Philipp Kern wrote:
Iustin,
On 08/06/2010 01:11 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I uploaded these two packages yesterday, and I was hoping they will get
into testing. But I see now both marked as Not touching package due to
block request by freeze. Even though
Hi,
I uploaded these two packages yesterday, and I was hoping they will get
into testing. But I see now both marked as Not touching package due to
block request by freeze. Even though they were uploaded yesterday :)
The only difference from current testing version is the new -dbg
package, which
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
we all want to get out squeeze as soon as possible. Currently we are
still at 400 bugs concerning the next stable release, with 300 of them not
yet fixed in unstable.
We would like to know what needs
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:19:07PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:29:04AM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
libprotobuf3 has been removed.
So libcompizconfig0 (and the whole compiz stack) is uninstalable.
I've scheduled binNMUs for this package now. (Seems to be
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 05:01:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Iustin Pop wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to update ganeti to stable-proposed-updates to fix the above
bug. It's a simple one-line change; I see only one potential breakage
out
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to update ganeti to stable-proposed-updates to fix the above
bug. It's a simple one-line change; I see only one potential breakage
out of it - if people already did the symlink fix pointed out in the
bug
-1.2.6/debian/changelog
+++ ganeti-1.2.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ganeti (1.2.6-3+lenny1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix hvmloader path to match Lenny's xen-utils-3.2-1
+(Closes: #528618)
+
+ -- Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:29:14 +0200
+
ganeti (1.2.6-3) unstable
Hi,
I'm more seeking clarification than requesting unblock.
Yesterday ganeti-1.2.6-3 was uploaded to unstable, fixing a bug we (upstream)
have been hunting for around a month. The bug (510965) is a real bug that
affects all users, however in some cases it (as in my virtualbox VMs) it has no
Hi,
The ganeti package was removed from testing a while ago because Xen was
no longer available in Lenny (see bug #474452). IOW the reason for
removal was not the package itself, but unfulfillable recommends.
However, now Xen is available again and I'm wondering if we can get
ganeti back into
21 matches
Mail list logo
