Bug#990956: uploading lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates
tags 990956 -moreinfo thanks On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:46:12PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 20-07-2021 00:29, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > >> Still not promising anything, but what would be the proposed change in > >> t-p-u? > > Please find attached the proposed change. Please note that it only > > affects the testsuite. > > That last note was what I was hoping for. Under the assumption that the > upload happens soon (we're hopefully close to releasing), please go > ahead. Please remove the moreinfo tag once the upload happened. Done, thanks. Hopefully this looks alright. Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#837728: Heimdal has done a new release
Heimdal has done a new release, which has been packaged and will hopefully make it into stretch, rendering this removal request unnecessary. The only thing that's preventing its migration to testing at the moment is a regression in binutils on MIPS (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844357). signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#837728: New Heimdal RC
Just a quick update to this bug: some awesome people upstream (thanks!) have taken on the effort of getting another Heimdal release out. A RC has been pushed out, and hopefully a final 7 release will follow before the end of the year. Unfortunately, with the release schedule for Debian being what it is, the timing is far from ideal [1]. [1] The irony is that the impending removal of Heimdal from Debian highlighted the urgency for upstream of getting a release out.
Bug#840188: jessie-pu: package tevent/0.9.25-0+deb8u1
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:15:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 12:15 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I would like to update tevent in jessie to 0.9.28. This is necessary, > > because the proposed version of Samba depends on new features > > (https://bugs.debian.org/836795). > > With the changelog distribution finalised, please go ahead. > > I assume that the samba update will have its libtevent-dev build-dep > version updated to ensure that 0.9.28 is used. Thanks, uploaded.
Bug#836795: jessie-pu: package samba/2:4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:34:55AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 00:16 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 20:50 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > I'd like to update Samba in jessie to 4.2.14+dfsg. Debdiff is attached. > > > > > > > > The 4 Samba releases since 4.2.10 (currently in jessie) only fix > > > > important bugs, in particular a CVE (CVE-2016-2119) and various > > > > regressions introduced by the security fixes from 4.2.10. > > > > > > Please go ahead, with the changelog distribution set to "jessie". > > > > > > I'll hopefully be able to find a suitable machine on my work network to > > > test with, and I assume at least Lars Maes would also be happy to test. > > > > Can I also upload a new minor version of tevent that's required by > > this version of Samba? > > I'd prefer a separate bug for that, please, as tracking one package > upload per p-u bug makes things much easier. Done, submitted as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840188 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#836795: jessie-pu: package samba/2:4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 20:50 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I'd like to update Samba in jessie to 4.2.14+dfsg. Debdiff is attached. > > > > The 4 Samba releases since 4.2.10 (currently in jessie) only fix > > important bugs, in particular a CVE (CVE-2016-2119) and various > > regressions introduced by the security fixes from 4.2.10. > > Please go ahead, with the changelog distribution set to "jessie". > > I'll hopefully be able to find a suitable machine on my work network to > test with, and I assume at least Lars Maes would also be happy to test. Can I also upload a new minor version of tevent that's required by this version of Samba? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#837728: RM: heimdal/1.7~git20150920+dfsg-4
Hi Emilio, On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 06:28:05PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/09/16 01:23, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: rm > > > > Please remove the heimdal source package from testing. As maintainers, > > we believe that Heimdal is not in a good enough state to be included in > > a stable release. > > > > There is still some activity in the upstream Git master branch. However: > > > > * The last regular release (1.5) was in 2011, last RC was in 2012 > > * No security releases since Jan 2012, despite various recent security > > releases for MIT Kerberos since and occasional security releases while > > Heimdal > > was active > > * There is no noticeable QA happening upstream. Tests fail on 32 bit, > > regressions have been introduced. > > * Nobody upstream is interested in release management; we have asked > > about this on the development list multiple times. > > > > I have filed bugs against the packages that depend on Heimdal to > > either switch to building against Heimdal OR MIT or to drop their > > Heimdal dependencies altogether. > > The build dependency should prefer MIT kerberos in that case, as > sbuild/buildds > only look at the first alternative. That is the case. > Please make those bugs block this one so we can track progress. I've added them as blockers. There are four still open. Thanks, Jelmer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#837728: RM: heimdal/1.7~git20150920+dfsg-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove the heimdal source package from testing. As maintainers, we believe that Heimdal is not in a good enough state to be included in a stable release. There is still some activity in the upstream Git master branch. However: * The last regular release (1.5) was in 2011, last RC was in 2012 * No security releases since Jan 2012, despite various recent security releases for MIT Kerberos since and occasional security releases while Heimdal was active * There is no noticeable QA happening upstream. Tests fail on 32 bit, regressions have been introduced. * Nobody upstream is interested in release management; we have asked about this on the development list multiple times. I have filed bugs against the packages that depend on Heimdal to either switch to building against Heimdal OR MIT or to drop their Heimdal dependencies altogether. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.7.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
