Bug#1057089: bullseye-pu: package usrmerge/37~deb12u1

On Nov 29, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Improve the usrmerge experience in bookworm. Great idea, thank you for working on this! -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1050681: bookworm-pu: package inn2/2.7.1-1~deb12u1

nnrpd hangs +when compression is enabled. + * Added patch backport_f7d111aad: this upstream commit adds support for +high-precision syslog timestamps which now are the default in Debian. + * Made inn-{radius,secrets}.conf not world readable. + + -- Marco d'Itri Mon, 28 Aug 2023 02:04:59

Bug#1050542: bookworm-pu: package openbsd-inetd/0.20221205-2+deb12u1

+1,21 @@ +openbsd-inetd (0.20221205-2+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Rebuilt for bookworm. + + -- Marco d'Itri Sat, 26 Aug 2023 00:34:16 +0200 + +openbsd-inetd (0.20221205-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Updated the Debian patch default_v4v6 to fix fix a double free and +a memory

Re: Bug#1038853: usrmerge: clean up the unused empty biarch directories

Release managers, I would like to upload to 12.1 a new package to fix this (and other minor issues). On Jun 22, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: usrmerge > Version: 35 > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > bootstrapping a merged-/usr system or earlier conversions may have > created empty

Bug#1035673: unblock: whois/5.5.17

/changelog b/debian/changelog index 741c74a..13123bc 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +whois (5.5.17) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Robert Scheck ] + * Added the .cd TLD server. + * Updated the -kg NIC handles server name. + + [ Marco d'Itri ] + * Removed 2 new

Bug#1035672: unblock: inn2/2.7.1-1

.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New upstream release. + * Breaks manpages-dev << 6.03-2 to make upgrades smoother, because of +file(3) and list(3) removed from inn2-dev 2.6.5-1. (Closes: #1035098) + + -- Marco d'Itri Mon, 01 May 2023 19:25:42 +0200 + inn2 (2.7.1~20230322-1) unstabl

Bug#1034468: unblock: inn2/2.7.1~20230322-1

On Apr 26, Paul Gevers wrote: > PS: have you considered adding a non-superficial autopkgtest to your package > such that you don't need to wait for us to unblock your package? Yes, long story. There is actually one but it is not run, because it needs to be significantly modified to actually

Bug#1034468: unblock: inn2/2.7.1~20230322-1

. Using relative paths confuses libtool diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index ffbb0e6a6..eff319e64 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +inn2 (2.7.1~20230322-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New release candidate 1 of the stable branch. + + -- Marco

Bug#1033694: unblock: gortr/0.14.7-2

-03 09:17:16.0 +0100 +++ gortr-0.14.7/debian/changelog 2023-03-27 22:43:29.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gortr (0.14.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Stop building gortr because it is unmaintained and has been generally +replaced by stayrtr. + + -- Marco d'Itri Mon, 27 Mar 2023

Bug#1033693: unblock: stayrtr/0.5.1-2

integrated. + * Recommend rpki-client. + + -- Marco d'Itri Tue, 28 Mar 2023 23:09:15 +0200 + stayrtr (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. diff -Nru stayrtr-0.5.1/debian/control stayrtr-0.5.1/debian/control --- stayrtr-0.5.1/debian/control 2023-02-27 03:23:32.0 +0100

Bug#1033536: unblock: inn2/2.7.1~20230306-1

EM" $? > $@ diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 83259fbb6..ffbb0e6a6 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +inn2 (2.7.1~20230306-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * New upstream snapshot of the stable branch. + + -- Marco d'Itri Thu, 09

Bug#1033180: unblock: stayrtr/0.5.1-1

nt, v4count, v6count) diff -Nru stayrtr-0.5.0/debian/changelog stayrtr-0.5.1/debian/changelog --- stayrtr-0.5.0/debian/changelog 2023-02-27 03:36:29.0 +0100 +++ stayrtr-0.5.1/debian/changelog 2023-03-05 01:11:49.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +stayrtr (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency

Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

On Feb 04, Paul Gevers wrote: > I don't see the preparation happening in time for bookworm, so if the > preparations are done for trixie, Berkeley DB can be removed in forky. I object again to removing Berkeley DB: it is mature software and it works fine. At least inn2 uses it, and a

Bug#1005273: bullseye-pu: package libretls/3.4.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu As discussed with Moritz Mühlenhoff of the security team I would like to explore the possibility of adding the librtls package to a bullseye point release, to be able to update

Re: multiple RPKI-related vulnerabilities in stable

On Nov 30, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > https://rpki.exposed/ lists a long number of vulnerabilities affecting > Ironically this website is unreachable since at least yesterday :-) This was the linked page:

multiple RPKI-related vulnerabilities in stable

https://rpki.exposed/ lists a long number of vulnerabilities affecting software in Debian stable: fort-validator, cfrpki, and rpki-client. (Not routinator, because it is an unpackagable mess of Rust.) (To make a long story short, RPKI is a way to digitally sign BGP routes and all network

Bug#993049: bullseye-pu: package rpki-trust-anchors/20210817-1+deb11u1

On Aug 27, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > The version number for a stable upload needs to be lower than the > version currently in unstable. As a no-change rebuild, the convention > would be 20210817-1~deb11u1, in the same style as backports. > > With that change in mind, please go ahead. Done. But

Bug#993049: bullseye-pu: package rpki-trust-anchors/20210817-1+deb11u1

:41.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +rpki-trust-anchors (20210817-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Rebuilt for the stable distribution. + + -- Marco d'Itri Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:21:41 +0200 + +rpki-trust-anchors (20210817-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added the https URL to the LACNIC TAL

Bug#990778: unblock: whois/5.5.10

5 new gTLDs which are no longer active. + * Updated the charset for whois.lacnic.net, whois.ax, whois.cira.ca +and whois.dns.pt. + * Fixed reporting an older version number when using --version. + + -- Marco d'Itri Sun, 06 Jun 2021 19:54:13 +0200 + whois (5.5.9) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#988259: unblock: usrmerge/25

) + + -- Marco d'Itri Tue, 27 Apr 2021 01:21:48 +0200 + usrmerge (24) unstable; urgency=medium * Moved the scripts to /usr/lib/usrmerge/ on request of Ubuntu for better diff -Nru usrmerge-24/debian/po/es.po usrmerge-25/debian/po/es.po --- usrmerge-24/debian/po/es.po 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0

Bug#987649: unblock: libxcrypt/1:4.4.18-4

+0200 @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ +libxcrypt (1:4.4.18-4) unstable; urgency=high + + * Move back the .pc file (and also .so and .a) to /usr/lib/ to fix a +regression introduced by the precedent upload. (Closes: #987130) + + -- Marco d'Itri Mon, 19 Apr 2021 02:46:31 +0200 + +libxcrypt (1:4.4.18-3) unstable

Bug#987117: unblock: rpki-trust-anchors/20210417-1

-20210417/debian/changelog 2021-04-17 11:55:56.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +rpki-trust-anchors (20210417-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Updated the https URL for the APNIC TAL. + + -- Marco d'Itri Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:55:56 +0200 + +rpki-trust-anchors (20200621-2) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#987071: unblock: netbase/6.3

. +It is not relevant anymore because all such entries for ports assigned to +non-used transports should have been removed starting from release 5.4. + + -- Marco d'Itri Sat, 27 Mar 2021 23:33:28 +0100 + netbase (6.2) unstable; urgency=medium * services: added https (443/udp) which was removed in 5.4

Bug#987072: unblock: whois/5.5.9

+ + * Updated the .ga TLD server. + * Removed the .cd and cf TLD servers. + * Removed 72 new gTLDs which are no longer active. + + -- Marco d'Itri Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:38:20 +0100 + whois (5.5.8) unstable; urgency=medium * Added the .xn--4dbrk0ce (.ישראל, Israel) TLD server. diff -Nru whois-5.5.8

Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

On Apr 16, Bastian Blank wrote: > postfix is easy. Would inn2 be license compliant with a AGPL licensed > BDB, aka able to provide the source to it's users, or what is the plan > anyway? The plan is to continue using 5.3, not upgrading. > slapd defaults to LMDB since several years and you

Bug#987013: Release goal proposal: Remove Berkeley DB

On Apr 15, Bastian Blank wrote: > After this time we really should try to get rid of this package, which > even is NMU maintained since three years. I am not persuaded. I maintain libberkeleydb-perl and it works fine, it is mature software. But even if we agree that all the libdb5.3 reverse

Bug#939526: buster-pu: package inn2/2.6.3-1+deb10u1

=medium + + * Backported upstream changeset 10344 to fix negotiation of DHE +ciphersuites. (See #931256.) + * Backported upstream changeset 10348 to fix upstream changeset 10344. + + -- Marco d'Itri Sun, 06 Oct 2019 00:51:59 +0200 + inn2 (2.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream

Bug#939526: buster-pu: package inn2/2.6.3-1~deb10u1

On Sep 17, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Shouldn't the assignment to "r" be outside of the conditional? Otherwise, if > ffdheX has previously been initialised, the function will return NULL rather > than the previously loaded buffer. Thank you, upstream confirmed. I did a new upload to unstable and

Bug#939526: buster-pu: package inn2/2.6.3-1~deb10u1

changeset 10344 to fix negotiation of DHE +ciphersuites. (See #931256.) + + -- Marco d'Itri Thu, 05 Sep 2019 23:25:56 +0200 + inn2 (2.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release. diff -Nru inn2-2.6.3/debian/patches/changeset_10344 inn2-2.6.3/debian/patches/changeset_10344

Bug#930429: unblock: whois/5.4.3

4.3/debian/changelog2019-06-12 15:03:56.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +whois (5.4.3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added the new 2a10:::/12 IPv6 assignment to RIPE. + + -- Marco d'Itri Wed, 12 Jun 2019 15:03:56 +0200 + whois (5.4.2) unstable; urgency=medium * Added the .ss an

Bug#930394: unblock: usrmerge/22

) + + -- Marco d'Itri Sun, 09 Jun 2019 14:54:21 +0200 + usrmerge (21) unstable; urgency=medium * Added a version to the conflict with ebtables (see #912046). diff -Nru usrmerge-21/debian/control usrmerge-22/debian/control --- usrmerge-21/debian/control 2019-02-17 17:41:06.0 +0100

Bug#929625: unblock: bird/1.6.6-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock the bird package because the version in testing has some serious bugs about routes propagation, better explained in the attached diff. This was discussed in #928141, where

Re: fixing debian-security-support upgrades from stretch (for good)

On May 13, Holger Levsen wrote: > So I think this can only be fixed properly (=without asking people to > upgrade to the latest stretch pointrelease but instead allowing upgrades > to buster from *any* stretch pointrelease) by adding a "pre-depends: > debian-security-support (>= 2019.04.25)" to

Bug#928148: RM: libxcrypt/1:4.1.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Since more recent versions of the package have been stuck in NEW for over six months there is no point in shipping in buster this old version which nobody should use anyway. libxcrypt

Bug#925885: unblock: whois/5.4.2

the .fm TLD server. + + -- Marco d'Itri Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:48:28 +0100 + whois (5.4.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Added the .mw TLD server. diff --git a/po/pl.po b/po/pl.po index fa7ba40..4d021cf 100644 --- a/po/pl.po +++ b/po/pl.po (omitted) diff --git a/tld_serv_list b/tld_serv_list index

Bug#882391: nmu: inn2_2.6.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu inn2 needs to be rebuilt for i386 on stable to fix #882225, because the original package was built in a merged-/usr environment and the configure script picked up the wrong path for gzip.

Bug#869920: stretch-pu: package whois/5.2.17+deb9u1

/changelog2017-07-27 17:45:04.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,32 @@ +whois (5.2.17+deb9u1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Rebuilt for stretch. + + -- Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:45:04 +0200 + +whois (5.2.17) unstable; urgency=high + + * Fixed whois referrals for .com

Bug#863813: unblock: kmod/24-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package kmod A new upstream release with only bug fixes, it has been in unstable since february. https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/md/kmod.git/log/ unblock kmod/24-1

Bug#863812: unblock: whois/5.2.15

Linux platforms. + * Fixed a lot of minor compiler warnings with no practical effects. + * Added support for libidn2, not enabled yet. + + -- Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:37:41 +0100 + whois (5.2.14) unstable; urgency=medium * Updated the .ar, .bm and .fm TLD server

Re: Merged /usr - supported in stretch?

On Mar 21, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Merged /usr does not seem to be ready for a stable release right now. I disagree: it works quite well. > Not limited to this bug, my general impression of the current state of > merged /usr is that it mostly works - but it is not yet in a state

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Nov 16, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > * Some obscure feature (e. g. BlaBla20) may be missing or be difficult > to support on a limited number of packages (e. g. apache2) ChaCha20 is hardly obscure: if it is to you then I fear that your opinion on this issue is not

Bug#782115: unblock: whois/5.2.7

string. + * Updated the list of new gTLDs + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Wed, 25 Mar 2015 23:04:44 +0100 + +whois (5.2.6) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added the .edu.ph TLD server. + * Removed the .gov.py TLD server. (Closes: #780562) + * Updated the list of new gTLDs. + * Implemented

Bug#780044: unblock: whois/5.2.5

recovered IPv4 allocations. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Tue, 03 Mar 2015 02:15:57 +0100 + whois (5.2.4) unstable; urgency=medium * Fixed referrals handling for the .cc, .tv a .jobs TLDs. diff -Nru whois-5.2.4/ip_del_recovered.h whois-5.2.5/ip_del_recovered.h --- whois-5.2.4

Bug#778766: unblock: whois/5.2.4

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index ca6678a..c6d1187 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +whois (5.2.4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fixed referrals handling for the .cc, .tv a .jobs TLDs. + * Updated the list of new gTLDs. + + -- Marco d'Itri m

Bug#770396: unblock: whois/5.2.2

(.мкд, Macedonia) and .xn--node (.გე, Georgia) +TLD servers. + * Updated the list of new gTLDs. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Thu, 06 Nov 2014 03:47:43 +0100 + whois (5.2.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Added the .aw and .zm TLD servers. diff -Nru whois-5.2.1/new_gtlds_list whois

Re: Bug#769046: inn2: Allow for better TLS configurability

Can I merge this for jessie? On Nov 11, christian mock c...@tahina.priv.at wrote: Source: inn2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, INN, at the moment, supports TLS connections to nnrpd, but does not allow any configuration besides the certificate and key. This means that

Re: Bug#769046: inn2: Allow for better TLS configurability

clone 769046 -1 reassign -1 release.debian.org block 769046 by -1 thanks Can I merge this for jessie? On Nov 11, christian mock c...@tahina.priv.at wrote: This means that Wheezy's nnrpd is currently susceptible to the CRIME (because TLS compression is on) and POODLE (because SSLv3 is

Bug#769279: Bug#769046: inn2: Allow for better TLS configurability

On Nov 12, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org wrote: Can you remove SSLv3 from the default list? I do not know the implications wrt clients support. Christian, did you do any tests? +=item Itlscompression +Whether to enable or disable TLS compression support (boolean). The +default is true.

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

In linux.debian.vote Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote: If people want to make Debian derivatives that work only with a particular init system, that's completely fine. The reverse - trying to put back support for sysvinit, if it gets taken out of Debian, would be very very

Bug#733266: pu: package whois/5.1.0

/debian/changelog --- whois-5.1.0/debian/changelog 2013-12-26 10:21:24.0 +0100 +++ whois-5.1.1/debian/changelog 2014-01-11 00:51:45.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +whois (5.1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added the servers for 29 new gTLDs. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Sat, 11 Jan

Bug#733266: pu: package whois/5.1.0

On Dec 28, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: This change isn't explicitly documented afaics. Have servers stopped supporting the S flag, or was it not actually supported to begin with? I have forgot the exact details of what it meant, but it was not commonly used and it is not

Bug#733266: pu: package whois/5.1.0

) -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:05:43 +0100 whois (5.0.26) unstable; urgency=low * Added the .cf TLD server. * Updated the .bi TLD server. * Added a new ASN allocation. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:48:12 +0200 whois (5.0.25) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#705651: unblock: inn2/2.5.3-3

for #690128. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:21:53 +0200 + +inn2 (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fixed the fix for #652733, which totally broke pgpverify. +(Closes: #685007) + * Handle upstream renaming of our conffile /etc/news/motd.news to +non-conffile /etc/news

Bug#705356: unblock: netbase/5.1

On Apr 15, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: * etc-services: removed console (782/tcp). Reverted because #658077 was totally bogus: this entry is not useful. Possibly, if this actually causes a problem. Is it harmless to leave it in place? It is harmful if appears in a release

Bug#705355: unblock: whois/5.0.23

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package whois Wheeze should really have fixes for these issues. The version currently in testing is totally broken for: - 6to4 addresses (#699928) - Korean domains -

Bug#705356: unblock: netbase/5.1

by postinst because they have no purpose. (Closes: #688090) * Made the package Multi-Arch foreign. (Closes: #688396) * Slightly raised the ifupdown Breaks version to match Ubuntu. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Tue, 02 Apr 2013 02:31:27 +0200 All changes can also be reviewed at http

please unblock whois

the .kp, .mc, .rw and .xn--mgba3a4f16a (ایران., Iran) TLD servers. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:25:05 +0200 whois (5.0.19) unstable; urgency=low * Added the .post TLD server. * Updated the .co.za SLD servers. (Closes: #687094) * Added the .alt.za, .net.za and .web.za

Re: Reviewing/unblocking udev/175-7

On Aug 25, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: 1. This one appears twice: + * Moved 60-persistent-input.rules back from udev-gtk-udeb to udev-udeb. +(Closes: #666223) I suspect a copy/paste failure, since 50-udev-default.rules was moved to, but not mentioned in the changelog? It

Re: Possible release note for systems running PHP through CGI.

On Aug 20, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be wrote: But some sites accept file uploads with arbitrary names, perhaps expected to be a JPEG image, but actually named bar.php.jpeg and containing malicious server-side PHP which they could execute from the browser. Don't Do That Then(TM). I see

Re: Possible release note for systems running PHP through CGI.

On Aug 19, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: - PHP scripts can be executed by Apache httpd through libapache2-mod-php5 or php5-cgi. Debian recommends libapache2-mod-php5, but there are still This is another issue which concerns me, since mod_php forces the use of preforking apache,

Re: please unblock kmod

On Aug 18, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i team. What does this fix? The important changes seem to be in the previous version already, the remaining changes are essentially in the testsuite AFAICT? There

please unblock kmod

It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i team. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock tcp-wrappers

if it is +installed for multiple architectures. (Closes: #682425) +Patch courtesy of Jonathan Nieder. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Mon, 30 Jul 2012 03:37:41 +0200 + tcp-wrappers (7.6.q-23) unstable; urgency=medium * Correctly install libwrap.{a,so} in the multiarch directory

Re: please unblock kmod

On Aug 12, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it (12/08/2012): It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i team. Please be patient, we don't need noise. sure, but can you clarify which event I need to wait for, so that I

please unblock whois

the .ae and .xn--mgbaam7a8h (.امارات, United Arabs Emirates) +TLDs. + * Updated the server charset table for .fr and .it. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:35:18 +0200 + whois (5.0.17) unstable; urgency=medium * Updated the .bi, .fo, .gr and .gt TLD servers. diff -urNp

please unblock kmod

It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i team. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: please unblock kmod

On Jul 27, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it (27/07/2012): It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i team. NACK for now. Can you be a little more specific? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock kmod

It was uploaded before the freeze cutoff, but it needs an ack by the d-i team. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Thank you so much for breaking d-i!

On Jul 15, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: thanks to the totally uncoordinated switch from module-init-tools to kmod, d-i is badly broken. We're in freeze, neither debian-boot or debian-release were contacted, that's a huge success! WTF are you talking about? We switched from

which udev release for wheezy?

Due to my day job commitments[1] I have been unable to work on udev for the last six months[2]. My original plan was to ship in wheezy udev 182, which was released in March, but I missed the freeze deadline and I know that uploading it now without comments would not be approved by the release

3.x kernels fix for the stable module-init-tools

/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +module-init-tools (3.12-2) stable; urgency=low + + * Backported upstream commit 3328d17 to support 3.x kernels. + + -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:09:19 +0100 + module-init-tools (3.12-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. diff -u module

please unblock udev

-- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock udev

-- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock udev

-- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock ppp

ppp (2.4.5-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Updated debconf translation: da. (Closes: #601791) -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:24:16 +0100 -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock udev

udev (164-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Backported multiple keymap and documentation bug fixes. * Removed dead usplash support code from initramfs.top. (Closes: #609279) * Updated one or more debconf translations. (Closes: #606997) -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:32:40

please unblock netbase

netbase (4.45) unstable; urgency=high * etc-services: added 4691 (mtn). (Closes: #607858) * etc-protocols: added dccp (33). (Closes: #610536) -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:14:59 +0100 -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

On Dec 24, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug log... This is what the

Re: udev 164-3 in squeeze?

On Dec 18, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Is udev 164-3 OK for release? I don't really know the impact of the Yes, and I still have one pending translation to merge. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

On Dec 16, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight LVM is unreliable in squeeze. it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see in

Re: Bug#598135: Severity

On Dec 01, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote: I'm currently wondering why #598135 is RC. Would someone care to explain what I'm missing? :) Causes data loss. I am working on a new package with this fix and the changes stuck in 2.5.2-2 because of libdb5. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc

please unblock whois 5.0.10

whois (5.0.10) unstable; urgency=medium * Added new IPv4 allocations. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:51:59 +0100 whois (5.0.9) unstable; urgency=low * Added new IPv4 allocations. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Sun, 12 Nov 2010 22:24:42 +0100 -- ciao, Marco

Re: Further udev uploads?

On Nov 19, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: So, are there plans to have the needed fixes in squeeze, avoid this regression and, as a side effect, get Updated one or more debconf translations. (Closes: #601182) in squeeze? I always have a plan. :-) -- ciao, Marco signature.asc

please unblock libberkeleydb-perl 0.42-1~squeeze1

0.42-1 has been stuck in unstable since february. libberkeleydb-perl (0.42-1~squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium * Package rebuilt for squeeze with libdb 4.8 since libdb 5.0 has not migrated to testing in time. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:32:16 +0200

Re: Further udev uploads?

On Nov 01, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: May I ask you what are your plans about futher uploads of udev? Uploads with new translations and bug fixes will continue as usual. I have been away a few days, I will upload 164-2 soon. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital

please unblock whois 5.0.8

. * Updated the .bd and .ps TLD servers. * Removed the .lk TLD server. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:57:40 +0200 -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: please unblock openbsd-inetd 0.20080125-5

On Aug 23, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: * Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582) The package doesn't appear to contain any changes to the init script: Oops... 0.20080125-6 is now ready for testing. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital

please unblock openbsd-inetd 0.20080125-5

openbsd-inetd (0.20080125-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Added --oknodo to the init script. (Closes: #592582) -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:33:09 +0200 -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

please unblock whois 5.0.7

. -- Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:58:21 +0200 -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

On Aug 13, Clint Adams sch...@debian.org wrote: Inasmuch as three months ago there was no reason to believe that mips would still be suffering from all kinds of toolchain breakage, I suppose. I still have seen no answers from the MIPS porters. Is there anybody home? -- ciao, Marco

libdb5, mips and squeeze

libdb5 has been failing to build on mips and mipsel for over 5 weeks, and apparently nobody cares. I have multiple packages linked to it which have not been able to move to testing, should I rebuild them for tpu or can I expect this to be solved in a reasonable timeframe? -- ciao, Marco

Re: libdb5, mips and squeeze

On Aug 12, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Is there a particular reason for not using the default (4.8) libdb version for those 2 packages? They're the only reverse-depends of db5.0 in the archive afaict. Not really, but was there a particular reason for not using the latest release

please hint udev

It will also fix the symptoms of #586404. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100806140418.gb20...@bongo.bofh.it

Re: lxc linux image flavour

On Jan 24, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote: the plan as decided in Portland was to go forward with openvz if upstream provides us with a patch in time. as currently this looks quite bad (latest available patch is for 2.6.27, there is no sign of a patch for 2.6.32, nor any schedule like

RM: inn2-lfs/testing [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386] -- NBS; not built anymore on kfreebsd-*

The packages was built by mistake by precedent releases but it is only needed on old 32 bit architectures. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

On Oct 13, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Were those deprecated sysfs features dropped from the kernel or could they still be activated even on newer ones, although they are disabled by default? This would probably break udev. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [Lenny,regression] Bug#524505: qcontrol: no longer works with udev in lenny

On Sep 08, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: - upload a new version of qcontrol to follow udev Probably the simplest option. I strongly doubt there are any other users of the persistent device name. Probably the best solution, since I just backported an upstream bug fix (that name with a

Re: [Lenny,regression] Bug#524505: qcontrol: no longer works with udev in lenny

On Sep 08, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: Especially when you know (well, assuming perfect memory ;-) that the device name in question is being used and changing it is known to break another package. I'll happily assume that you did simply forget or overlooked that fact when preparing

Re: Future of the s390 port

On Aug 31, Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: I doubt that I would be able to push this port through another release in the current state. The consequence would by that the port dies completely and with it the only free and released distribution for this machines. Is this really an

please unblock module-init-tools

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

  1   2   >