Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml

2023-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 23/09/2023 à 06:54, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : The following packages should be removed from testing for now:   gmetadom otags xmlrpc-light mlpost ulex0.8 ocamlviz I think Britney needs a little more help: the following packages should also be removed from testing: ocaml-http ocaml

Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml

2023-09-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi all, Le 20/09/2023 à 09:44, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : Good. Please go ahead I've uploaded ocaml 4.14.1-1 3 days ago, then uploaded camlp4, ocamlnet, a few other arch:all packages that could not be binNMUed, and binNMUed all the rest. All packages, except the ones I had already

Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml

2023-09-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 20/09/2023 à 09:27, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : Based on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html, diffoscope is involved in both the ocaml and the uncoordinated haskell transitions. Do we need rebuilds of diffoscope for ocaml? Why does it matter? If we would need them,

Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml

2023-09-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Sebastian, Le 20/09/2023 à 08:48, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : I recompiled the OCaml world with it: http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-4.14.1/ Based on https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html, diffoscope is involved in both the ocaml and the uncoordinated

Bug#1052239: transition: ocaml

2023-09-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: oc...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ocaml Dear Release Team, I uploaded ocaml 4.14.1 to experimental, and it built successfully on all release

Re: src:utop: fails to migrate to testing for too long: blocked by ocaml-logs rebuild

2023-08-11 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 11/08/2023 à 20:53, Paul Gevers a écrit : One current blocker is xmlrpc-light, which I mistakenly uploaded with urgency low 2 days ago, which therefore should not migrate before 8 days from now. It seems the connection is hidden. It would be nice if you could show how that works. Look

Re: src:utop: fails to migrate to testing for too long: blocked by ocaml-logs rebuild

2023-08-11 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Paul, On Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:44:23 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: [...]¨ Your package src:utop has been trying to migrate for 37 days [2]. [...] > If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. One

Bug#1035728: unblock: ocsigenserver/5.0.1-1+b12

2023-05-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
+0100 +++ ocsigenserver-5.0.1/debian/changelog2023-05-05 13:38:30.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +ocsigenserver (5.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Add missing Breaks+Replaces for libocsigenserver-ocaml-dev +(Closes: #1034938) + + -- Stéphane Glondu Fri, 05 May 2023 13:38:30 +0200

Bug#1034691: nmu: why3_1.5.1-1+b1 frama-c_20220511-manganese-3-10

2023-05-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Sebastian, Le 23/04/2023 à 11:36, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : ocaml 4.13.1-4 causes the ABI to change for at least why3. Do you expect that the ABI of ther ocaml packages also changes? If so, we should rebuild the ocaml world before the release to not get any surprises if a ocaml package

Re: xen_4.17.0+24-g2f8851c37f-1_multi.changes REJECTED [and 1 more messages]

2023-02-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Ian, Le 06/02/2023 à 11:41, Ian Jackson a écrit : ftpmaster REJECTed it: there is an ocaml stack rebuild[1] at them moment, where xen is a part of. So please upload to experimental. I am as surprised as you by this rejection reason... [1]

Bug#1002681: transition: ocaml

2022-02-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/01/2022 à 05:39, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >>> - ppx-tools-versioned (#1002941), ppxfind (#1002942): they seem >>> deprecated, should be removed from testing >> >> That would also require removal of: >> >> coq-elpi >> coq-hierarchy-bu

Bug#1002681: transition: ocaml

2022-01-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 24/01/2022 à 23:31, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : >> - ppx-tools-versioned (#1002941), ppxfind (#1002942): they seem >> deprecated, should be removed from testing > > That would also require removal of: > > coq-elpi > coq-hierarchy-builder > elpi > haxe > liquidsoap > mercurial-buildpackage >

Bug#1002681: transition: ocaml

2022-01-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 19/01/2022 à 09:34, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > The libguestfs build for the php8.1 transition migrated, so this > transition can proceed. Please go ahead. 5 days later, most of packages have been rebuilt with the new OCaml. The remaining outliers are: - hol-light (#1002983): the fix is

Bug#1002681: transition: ocaml

2022-01-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Le 09/01/2022 à 17:49, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > Please remove the moreinfo tag once ocaml-odoc-parser has been accepted. It has been yesterday. I think this transition is ready to be started. As usual, I will take care of binNMUs. Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#1002681: transition: ocaml

2021-12-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Dear Release Team, I've updated ocaml to 4.13.1 (released on 2021-10-01) and uploaded to experimental. It builds on all release

Bug#1001441: Please override urgency of lwt and ocplib-endian

2021-12-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Release Team, I've just realized that I've uploaded lwt and ocplib-endian with urgency=low instead of medium, setting their testing migration delay to 10 days. Now, 5 days have past, and these two packages seem to block the migration of 50 other

Bug#1000632: RM: coq/8.12.0-3+b3 and others

2021-11-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Dear Release Managers, #1000573 prevents a bunch of packages [1] from migrating to testing. It would makes things better if coq and some

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-11-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/10/2020 à 11:31, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : > I have scheduled all binNMUs and uploaded the necessary packages, and > most of packages have been built now. > > IMHO, the major blocker for now are llvm-toolchain-{9,10} which FTBFS on > ppc64el. The other issues c

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 12/10/2020 à 09:57, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, and the breakage is minimal. >>> >>> Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are you taking care of >>> that? >> >> I will take care of filing bugs and/or

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 10/10/2020 à 17:58, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : >> I tried to install all corresponding opam packages in a 4.11.1 switch, >> and the breakage is minimal. > > Have bugs been filed for the these issues or are you taking care of > that? I will take care of filing bugs and/or fixing issues. And

Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-09-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org Dear Release Team, I've updated ocaml to 4.11.1 and uploaded to experimental. It builds on all release architectures, and most of ports

Bug#951761: buster-pu: package opam/2.0.3-1

2020-02-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
-2.0.3/debian/changelog 2019-02-01 12:05:09.0 +0100 +++ opam-2.0.3/debian/changelog 2020-02-18 07:42:31.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +opam (2.0.3-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium + + * Team upload + * Prefer mccs over aspcud (Closes: #908203) + + -- Stéphane Glondu Tue, 18 Feb 2020 07

Re: Autopkgtest preventing ocaml-dune from migrating to testing

2020-02-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, Le 03/02/2020 à 21:05, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> Currently, ocaml-dune/2.1.3-1 is blocked in unstable because of >> autopkgtest failure of ocaml-sedlex/2.1-3. However, this test failure >> has been fixed in ocaml-sedlex/2.1-4. Likewise, ocaml-sedlex/2.1-4 is >> bloked in unstable because of

Autopkgtest preventing ocaml-dune from migrating to testing

2020-02-03 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Release Managers, Currently, ocaml-dune/2.1.3-1 is blocked in unstable because of autopkgtest failure of ocaml-sedlex/2.1-3. However, this test failure has been fixed in ocaml-sedlex/2.1-4. Likewise, ocaml-sedlex/2.1-4 is bloked in unstable because of autopkgtest failure of itself, but this

Bug#941907: transition: ocaml

2019-11-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/11/2019 à 21:28, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> Let's see where we are when all ages are fine. > > I'm failing to (quickly) see why ocaml doesn't want to migrate. Does > anybody already have some foo laying around to see what the problem is? > I'm only seeing ocaml in the autohinter section,

Bug#941907: transition: ocaml

2019-11-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, Le 12/11/2019 à 20:24, Paul Gevers a écrit : >> Here is a status update after 8 days. >> >> Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few >> exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages >> (except llvm-toolchain-8) can be removed from testing. > > I am

Bug#941907: transition: ocaml

2019-11-12 Thread Stéphane Glondu
block 941907 by 943920 thanks Le 04/11/2019 à 13:50, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : >> Please go ahead. > > Started. Here is a status update after 8 days. Most of the packages have been updated or rebuilt. For the few exceptions, bugs have been filed and all of the concerned packages

Bug#941907: transition: ocaml

2019-11-04 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/11/2019 à 21:06, Paul Gevers a écrit : > On 07-10-2019 15:50, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> I think it's time to upgrade OCaml to 4.08.1. >> >> It has been uploaded to experimental, and builds fine on all release >> architectures. [1] >> >> Most

Bug#941907: transition: ocaml

2019-10-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I think it's time to upgrade OCaml to 4.08.1. It has been uploaded to experimental, and builds fine on all release architectures. [1] Most of reverse-dependencies

Bug#934872: RM: ocaml-usb/1.3.0-4 ocaml-sqlexpr/0.5.5-3 zeroinstall-injector/2.12.3-2 obus/1.1.5-6

2019-08-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 21/08/2019 à 20:07, Thomas Leonard a écrit : >> Again, this removal from testing is not a definitive removal from Debian >> and may be just temporary. I didn't mean to be hostile. > > Do you have an idea of when this will be? I should be able to look at > a workaround this weekend if it's not

Bug#934872: RM: ocaml-usb/1.3.0-4 ocaml-sqlexpr/0.5.5-3 zeroinstall-injector/2.12.3-2 obus/1.1.5-6

2019-08-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 21/08/2019 à 18:26, Thomas Leonard a écrit : >> Please remove the following packages from testing: >> >> * ocaml-usb, affected by #933993 >> * ocaml-sqlexpr, affected by #933994 >> * zeroinstall-injector, affected by #934340 >> * obus, affected by #933992 > > Hi, > > I'm the maintainer of

Re: Haskell binnmus is there a problem?

2019-08-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 21/08/2019 à 10:14, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : >> I used to schedule these, but for many months it seems it wasn't >> necessary, not sure if someone else scheduled them > > At the very least, quite some times pochu did them the last year, fwiw. > >> Going forward, it is not sustainable for this

Bug#934872: RM: ocaml-usb/1.3.0-4 ocaml-sqlexpr/0.5.5-3 zeroinstall-injector/2.12.3-2 obus/1.1.5-6

2019-08-15 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Dear Release Managers, Please remove the following packages from testing: * ocaml-usb, affected by #933993 * ocaml-sqlexpr, affected by #933994 * zeroinstall-injector, affected by #934340

Re: Bits from the Release Team: ride like the wind, Bullseye!

2019-08-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 07/07/2019 à 03:47, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit : > No binary maintainer uploads for bullseye > = > > The release of buster also means the bullseye release cycle is about to begin. > From now on, we will no longer allow binaries uploaded by maintainers to

Bug#899189: nmu: unison_2.48.3-1

2018-07-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 06/07/2018 03:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> For the sake of completeness, here's an extra data point. If someone >> ends up with two peers with versions 2.48.3-1 vs. 2.48.3-1+b1 (hosts >> with s-p-u enabled, but not dist-upgraded at the same time), one can >> get this very issue: >> | Uncaught

Bug#899189: nmu: unison_2.48.3-1

2018-05-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, Currently, Unison in Stretch is compiled with OCaml 4.01.0 (at least on i386), while OCaml in Stretch is 4.02.3. This triggers a subtle interoperability bug more often than it should,

Bug#871469: Status of llvm-toolchain-3.8?

2017-11-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 30/10/2017 10:39, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Is there any plans to fix llvm-toolchain-3.8? I wish we could removed it but it is far from ready (we were blocked by the ocaml transition but I dropped the ocaml support to mitigate that) I will try to fix that in the next few days. Sorry about

Bug#871469: Status of llvm-toolchain-3.8?

2017-10-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 20/10/2017 10:27, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: At the moment, llvm-toolchain-3.8 FTBFS with "gcc-7.2: Command not found" and this blocks the OCaml transition. I see there are already bugs open related to gcc-7 (#871011 and #853523), but these do not have recent activity. I also see that this

Bug#871469: Status of llvm-toolchain-3.8?

2017-10-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, At the moment, llvm-toolchain-3.8 FTBFS with "gcc-7.2: Command not found" and this blocks the OCaml transition. I see there are already bugs open related to gcc-7 (#871011 and #853523), but these do not have recent activity. I also see that this package has been requested to be

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-10-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 09/10/2017 21:45, Ximin Luo wrote: That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? I am handling these. Would it be possible to prioritize the rebuilds of lwt and ocaml-ctypes? They seem to be in the

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-09-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? I am handling these. Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-08-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > [...] >> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to >> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3]. > >> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started from my point of >> view.

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

2017-08-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, We would like to update ocaml from 4.02.3 to 4.05.0. This is 3 major releases (and 2 years) ahead. With current unstable, on amd64: - 9 source uploads (at least) are

Bug#870336: Helping migration of camlp5, lablgtk2, etc.

2017-08-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Dear RT, camlp5, lablgtk2 and other packages have been waiting for migration to testing for a while. Their migration is essentially blocked by hol-light and botch which FTBFS at the moment. Here are hints to make things evolve (courtesy of

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-10-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 30/09/2015 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition? > > Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update? plplot has been removed from testing. No other improvements, but I believe we can

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.3

2015-09-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition? Cheers, -- Stéphane

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.2

2015-06-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 23/06/2015 23:45, Eric Cooper a écrit : I've updated approx to version 5.5-2 to fix the build failure due to deprecation of String.create in 4.02. Thank you. So I'd appreciate it if someone could build it from the master branch of git.debian.org/git/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/approx.git and

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.2

2015-06-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 22/06/2015 15:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : Or if you can give a more detailed explanation of what will happen after ocaml is uploaded, binNMUs are scheduled, and we have ~30 packages that are holding the transition. I say we remove them from testing. dak rm -Rn -s testing shows that

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.2

2015-06-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 19/06/2015 12:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : I see some of the failing packages have in the log: - Finished parsing the build-deps Wrong version of OCaml! That does that mean the package couldn't be built because of the dependency problems you mention? Indeed. My only concern

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.2

2015-06-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 18/06/2015 17:06, Eric Cooper a écrit : Attached is the list of packages appearing in the tracker, with an annotation: - unstable if the package can be binNMUed - experimental if the package has to be uploaded from experimental - UNRELEASED if the package has to be uploaded from git

Bug#789133: transition: ocaml 4.02.2

2015-06-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Managers and OCaml Maintainers, I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.02.2 (released yesterday) as soon as possible. This version has been preceded by a release

Bug#718767: pango1.0 binNMUed

2013-12-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, lablgtk2 was uninstallable because of pango1.0, which was uninstallable because of harfbuzz. I tried to rebuild on my machine pango1.0, and it unlocks the situation w.r.t lablgtk2. I saw someone binNMUed it on hurd-i386. I binNMUed it on other architectures as well (with dw on

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.01.0

2013-12-02 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/12/2013 13:54, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit : I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them have been fixed in experimental. As usual, it involves a lot of binNMUs; I will take care of those. Now, I

Bug#730619: [PATCH] Add a transition collision detector.

2013-11-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: ben Version: 0.6.6 Severity: normal Le 09/02/2012 18:21, Niels Thykier a écrit : While this post-processing of generated HTML files is kind of ugly, it makes it easy to show which transitions might be entangled due to collisions. [...] I am in favor of using this as a temporary

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.01.0

2013-11-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
retitle 718767 transition: ocaml 4.01.0 thanks Le 05/08/2013 10:43, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them have been fixed in experimental. As usual, it involves a lot

Bug#718767: ocaml_4.01.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2013-11-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 09/11/2013 10:32, Hendrik Tews a écrit : Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org writes: Source: ocaml Version: 4.01.0-1 does this mean we skip the 4.00 transition and transition directly to 4.01, when the release team finally approves? Yes. Does this also mean that

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-10-27 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 02/10/2013 19:43, Julien Cristau a écrit : I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian. [...] Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition, That was one week ago. nova has migrated to testing and

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-10-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/09/2013 04:56, Thomas Goirand a écrit : I have uploaded Nova 2013.1.3-2 with removed support for XAPI, as you asked. I hope XCP support can come back quickly in Debian. [...] Hoping that this will help for the Ocaml transition, That was one week ago. nova has migrated to testing and

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-09-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit : However, as I wrote it, it's going to happen, so please be patient about it. IMO, this shouldn't block any transition though. If the release team is reading: just let everything transition to testing, and remove the old version of XCP 1.3.2 in

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-09-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 24/09/2013 15:48, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : If I remove all binary packages of xen-api from testing, the following new packages are broken: xcp-guest-templates, nova-xcp-plugins, nova-compute-xen. xcp-guest-templates is built by guest-templates which seems to be a leaf package and could

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-09-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 24/09/2013 19:00, Thomas Goirand a écrit : Please don't think this way. I work daily on 79 packages to maintain OpenStack in Debian: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org If you go that way, I could say that you're blocking my work on 214

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-09-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit : I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works. Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are different, and just using upstream 1.6

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-09-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 05/09/2013 23:18, Julien Cristau a écrit : tracker adjusted. xen-api is currently broken though, so you'll need to get that fixed before starting. I've just fixed a blocking bug (#713349) which was due to the renaming of an OCaml library (type-conv - type_conv). Now, xen-api FTBFS because

Re: Bug#713073: PTS: show library transition message also on the source package page

2013-08-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 16/08/2013 17:29, Giovanni Mascellani a écrit : @Release team: Joachim Breitner asked to patch PTS so that it displays not only the packages involved in a transition, but also the packages that cause the transition (see the example below). [...] Is Ben aware of this information? If so,

Re: Bug#713073: PTS: show library transition message also on the source package page

2013-08-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 20/08/2013 09:41, Niels Thykier a écrit : I think the reason why we prefer having the introducing source package as unaffected, is because it will be taken care of by a source upload (i.e. there is usually nothing for us to do about that package). [...] The tool was meant to track packages

Bug#718767: transition: ocaml 4.00.1

2013-08-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Managers, I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them have been fixed in

Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting

2013-05-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important Dear Release Managers, Now that glib has migrated, I think that camlp5 [1] and related packages need manual hinting. All the packages listed in the Coq section of [2] need to enter together. [1]

Re: Bug#709618: camlp5 et al need hinting

2013-05-24 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 24/05/2013 15:15, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : Looking at the dependencies, I guess why needs rebuilding against the new coq, or removing? Removing, because of #707585, as said in [1]. With Mehdi's approval (he is why's maintainer). [1]

Re: Bug#666825: Apache 2.4 upload date scheduled for May 30

2013-05-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 23/05/2013 13:13, Arno Töll a écrit : we are ready to upload Apache2 2.4 to Debian Sid now. This means the transition is effectively starting now, and going to break your modules. There are currently ~20 source entangled OCaml-related packages waiting to migrate to testing (see Ocsigen

Re: Bug#666825: Apache 2.4 upload date scheduled for May 30

2013-05-23 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 23/05/2013 13:57, Arno Töll a écrit : please coordinate this in #661958. I got an ACK of the Release Team, so I don't know if they had your issue on the radar or not. Either way, I know nothing about OCaml and your transition. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666825#47

OCaml transition plans

2013-05-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, During the freeze, a new major version of OCaml has been released. The current version is 4.00.1 (already in experimental, the one in sid is 3.12.1). It breaks some packages, and many of those have been fixed upstream meanwhile. It seems that most of the times, fixes are

Bug#693618: unblock: js-of-ocaml/1.2-2

2012-11-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Le 02/11/2012 22:23, Niels Thykier a écrit : It does not seem important, but given it is a doc-only change I am willing to accept it if you are still willing to upload it. If you do

Freeze exception request for js_of_ocaml 1.2-2

2012-10-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear Release Team, Bug #691257 made me realize that the upstream tarball of the Debian package is not the same as the one currently available on the upstream website, and the contents does not match tag 1.2 in the upstream repository either. There is one commit missing. It changes only changelog

Re: Bug#666825: Test rebuild of your package ocamlnet

2012-05-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 05/05/2012 13:48, a...@debian.org a écrit : this is a follow-up message to your Apache 2.4 transition bug for package ocamlnet. We are approaching an upload of the web server to Debian's Unstable repository as soon as the release team acknowledges the upload. Along that upload we are

Migration issue because of openvswitch...

2012-04-26 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, Currently, react (19 days old), xmlm (17 days) and xen-api (11 days) are stuck in unstable. One reason is the following: xen-api depends on xmlm and they must go together, and xen-api depends on (a new binary package of) openvswitch, which FTBFS (and has been for 32 days). Is there

Re: False negative in ben?

2012-04-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit : I regularly check http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the parameters,

Re: Bug#662281: camlimages: Please Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev

2012-03-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 05/03/2012 04:23, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit : Please change Build-Depends of the package from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev. PTS says that camlimages is part of libtiff4-symbols transition. Can I upload it anyway? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#633304: transition: ocaml

2011-09-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 09/07/2011 05:51 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am planning to update a few other packages

Bug#633304: transition: ocaml

2011-09-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 09/07/2011 13:35, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am planning to update a few other packages

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/05/2011 08:52, Thomas Goirand a écrit : -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 +[ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 Out of context, I would prefer something like: if [ $quiet

Re: Suggested release goal: /run

2011-04-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 30/03/2011 17:24, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : (Please keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed) [...] - /run should exist as a tmpfs - /var/run should be a symlink or bind mount of/to /run - /var/lock should be a symlink/bind mount to /run/lock - /lib/init/rw should be a symlink/bind mount to /run -

Re: Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-03-31 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 31/03/2011 20:35, Joachim Breitner a écrit : I’m surprised by the dependency level calculation – haskell-transformers should be on one level with -deepseq. But maybe that calculation is confused as the binary package names are changing during the transition. The code assumes (among other

Bug#618871: transition: ocaml

2011-03-30 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 29/03/2011 19:52, Julien Cristau a écrit : The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will be affected. I am waiting for the approval from the release team to proceed. Any news on that? Clearly

Bug#618871: transition: ocaml

2011-03-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 19/03/2011 08:40, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will be affected. I am waiting for the approval from the release team to proceed. Any news on that? Cheers

Bug#618871: transition: ocaml

2011-03-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will be affected. I am waiting for the

Bug#615062: nmu: packages broken by #613848

2011-02-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, Here is a binNMU request for packages that are broken by the (mini-)transition tracked with #613848. I've simulated it on amd64, and everything compiles [1] except ocaml-melt which

Bug#613848: Bug#615140: libsoundtouch-dev: needs to provide libsoundtouch1-dev

2011-02-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/02/2011 01:38, Julien Cristau a écrit : Package: libsoundtouch-dev Version: 1.5.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: i said so Apparently you decided to start a SONAME transition with no coordination with the release team. This will clash with the ongoing transition to ffmpeg 0.6,

Bug#614030: pu: package ocsigen/1.3.3-1squeeze1

2011-02-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Le 15/02/2011 19:34, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : Here it is. There is also currently a pending upload to unstable fixing the bug (among other things). Turning this into a bug report so

Bug#613848: (mini-)transition of OCaml libraries: camlp5, lablgtk2, ...

2011-02-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Owner: glo...@debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, I've prepared a small transition of some libs to new upstream versions, to be completed before the transition to OCaml = 3.12 (not yet planned). I've

Bug#613848: Transition to OCaml 3.12.0...

2011-02-17 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 10/02/2011 10:12, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit : I also have a pair of packages to update (sexplib, type-conv, bin-prot, ounit). Since some of them will break the distribution and should trigger the need to binNMU some other packages, I am not sure how to proceed: 1) upload new version during

S-P-U for #613372?

2011-02-14 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Dear release team, There are missing dependencies in the ocsigen package of squeeze (cf. #613372). Would it be possible to fix that for the next point release? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#612892: RM: matita/0.5.8-2+b1

2011-02-11 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hello, With approval of its maintainer, and for the reasons explained in [1], I request the removal of matita from testing. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612891

Bug#603968: unblock: camlbz2/0.6.0-6

2010-11-18 Thread Stéphane Glondu
-- Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:06:25 +0100 unblock camlbz2/0.6.0-6 Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel

Bug#600334: freeze exception for babeld/1.0.2-1

2010-10-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 25/10/2010 20:54, Julien Cristau a écrit : There has been a recent new bugfix release of babeld that fixes a possible crash on mips architectures. Attached is the diff of what I am planning to upload against the current version in unstable (and testing). Are you sure the bug affected

Bug#600334: freeze exception for babeld/1.0.2-1

2010-10-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
; urgency=low + + * New upstream release + + -- Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:01:24 +0200 + babeld (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff --git a/route.c b/route.c index b1a90db..3997af5 100644 --- a/route.c +++ b/route.c @@ -234,7 +234,7

Bug#599174: unblock: mldonkey/3.0.3-2

2010-10-05 Thread Stéphane Glondu
) -- Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:44:57 +0200 unblock mldonkey/3.0.3-2 Cheers, -- Stéphane -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel

Re: Freeze for LLVM packages

2010-08-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 29/08/2010 23:10, Arthur Loiret a écrit : There you go: http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-2.6_2.6-10.dsc http://people.debian.org/~aloiret/squeeze/llvm/llvm-2.6_2.6-10.debdiff From the diff: define libllvm-ocaml-dev_extra_binary if test x$* = xlibllvm-ocaml-dev

Freeze exception for llvm/2.6-9.1

2010-08-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
to libffi-dev (Closes: #573368) * libllvm-ocaml-dev: - apply Sylvain Le Gall's patch to fix META filename (Closes: #583475) - add suggestion to ocaml-findlib * Add debian/source/format -- Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:53:44 +0200 The full diff is available

Freeze exception for mldonkey

2010-08-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, mldonkey/3.0.3-1 has been uploaded to unstable before the announce of the freeze, but it seems blocked nonetheless (according to the PTS). This is a new upstream release, and has many changes... but most of them are bugfixes. The diff from the version in testing would be meaningless (but can

Re: Freeze exception for mldonkey

2010-08-08 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 08/08/2010 17:13, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : If yes, one more query: currently, it fails to build from source [...] I meant on kfreebsd-*. -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

  1   2   >