Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
the security team proposed to fix CVE-2011-4099 through p-u. I've prepared a
fixed package at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ based on a backport of the
fix from unstable/testing. You
Hi Philipp,
Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Or it's the removal of the package.
we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to
remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong opinion on
that.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Sylvestru,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Dalibor Topic just replied through his blog to one of my question about
the update 27 of sun-java6 being available under the dlj license:
http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html
thanks for the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
Oracle has updated the security baseline to 6.26 and that means we should update
the package in stable and oldstable. They plan to do such updates every 3 or 4
months from now on. I've
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
Hi,
Oracle has updated the security baseline to 6.26 and that means we should update
the package in stable and oldstable. They plan to do such updates every 3 or 4
months from now on. I've
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Reports of real-world tests on stable systems (successful or otherwise) would
be appreciated.
I am running jvisualvm before uploading to detect any stupid mistakes.
But I would be nice to have some nx server or
Hi,
Am 17.02.2011 16:21, schrieb Julien Cristau:
Do we have any idea what the new upstream releases include besides the
security related stuff? Your diff doesn't say that.
from the release notes:
- OlsonData 2010o
- Java DB 10.6.2.1
- other bug fixes: java_plugin - pogo games crashes AOL
@@
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.51~), lsb-release, po-debconf, defoma, unzip, bzip2, patch, libasound2, unixodbc, libx11-6, libxext6
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
Hi,
please have a look at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ for an (security)
update of sun-java6 in oldstable.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
Am 29.01.2011 23:38, schrieb David Kalnischkies:
Given that the feature was implemented on request for ftpmaster [0]
I at least hope they (still) use apt-ftparchive (at least for this)…
(and a quick grep over dak shows a few 'a-f generate' calls,
but yeah, thats guessing, as the feature
Hi Florian,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a
separate package there anyway, I think). Is there an easy way to do
this?
I think there is some code in debian/rules:
ifneq (,$(filter
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for
sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not
apply to openjdk, as far as I know.
I think that openjdk is not that
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Florian Weimer:
AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are
re-rebranded as IcedTea.
Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK.
Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 11:19 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
a new version of sun-java6 for stable is available at
http://people.debian.org/~twerner/.
There only seems to be a source package there. Have
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
a new version of sun-java6 for stable is available at
http://people.debian.org/~twerner/. It fixes multiple security issues. We
cannot patch the old upstream version because we have no
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 20:52 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
No. Do you want me to upload a version that fixes #580160 to testing?
Yes, please (sorry for the delay :-/)
I've uploaded version 1.7.0-4 to testing
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
317 files changed, 12971 insertions(+), 4237 deletions(-)
which is saner but was still a pain to review.
yes I agree.
The changelog suggests that the fix for that bug was simply the addition
reopen 592697
thanks
Hi,
thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected
because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have
introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes
the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as discussed at
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libhibernate3-java
It fixes the RC bug #593254 (conflict with hibernate-entititymanager).
The diff can be seen at
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libcap2
The upload fixes the RC bug #593250 (needs versioned dependency on
libpam-runtime). The diff can be seen at
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* Philipp Kern:
On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is
because the version number is greater than the one in testing.
apart from the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock the packages groovy, libjansi-java, libjansi-native-java,
and libhawtjni-runtime-java
The latest upstream minor release of groovy introduced 3 new
Build-Depends:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock the packages geronimo-validation-1.0-spec,
geronimo-jacc-1.1-spec, and geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec.
The uploads just add the missing pom.xml files needed by reverse
Build-Depends
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Marble tmar...@info9.net wrote:
On 07/28/2010 06:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1
release [1]. This version addresses some security issues,
and this version should be shipped with squeeze
A
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am filing 3 removal requests for
- sun-java6/unstable [ia64]
- sun-java6/stable [ia64]
- sun-java5/stable [ia64]
because the ia64 architecture on Debian cannot execute i386 binaries
currently. Please check bug #563402 for more information. The
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am filing 3 removal requests for
- sun-java6/unstable [ia64]
- sun-java6/stable [ia64]
- sun-java5/stable [ia64]
because the ia64 architecture on Debian cannot execute i386 binaries
currently. Please check bug #563402 for more information. The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
the non-free Sun JDKs often have security issues and can only be updated
through new upstream versions since we do not have source code. 1.5.0-22
will be the last upstream update because
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
the non-free Sun JDKs often have security issues and can only be updated
through new upstream versions since we do not have source code. The
security team asked me to update the package
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
the non-free Sun JDKs often have security issues and can only be updated
through new upstream versions since we do not have source code.
I forgot to mention that the new package is available at
http://people.debian.org
Joerg Jaspert schrieb:
And if one made sure no-action actually follows its name. :)
I am not aware of any problems in 'dak rm --no-action'. What's wrong
with it?
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
The problems arise, when there are still some packages (build-)depending
on the binary packages to be removed. I guess the correct thing for
broken build-depends is to fill RC bugs against the affected packages,
as they are (defacto) FTBFS.
I've given
Hi,
Ola Lundqvist schrieb:
I assume I file a bug against ftp.debian.org, right?
yes: reportbug ftp.debian.org | ANAIS
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
retitle 559789 RM: libgnucrypto-java -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps, low
popcon
reassign 559789 ftp.debian.org
retitle 566503 RM: libgnucrypto-java/stable -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps,
low popcon
# me and my mail
Dirk Eddelbuettel schrieb:
Maybe not. See
r-cran-rquantlib still depends on QL 0.9.7.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
ftp-team: Please decruft libquantlib-0.9.9.
# Broken Depends:
quantlib-swig: quantlib-python [amd64 hurd-i386]
quantlib-ruby [amd64]
rquantlib: r-cran-rquantlib
BinNMUs should be scheduled.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
Luk Claes schrieb:
The semi-automatic cruft removal seems to not have happened yet.
yes, cruft-report is still broken due to the new arch: all handling. I
am working on it. I'll remove liblzma0 and libshogun5 that after the
next dinstall run. Let me know if you are aware of other cruft in
Hi Luk,
Luk Claes schrieb:
libming0, libprotobuf4 and libprotoc4, python-nautilusburn
done, but the following packages need binNMUs:
salasaga [alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc]
protobuf-c [mips]
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Rob,
Rob Browning schrieb:
I'd like to consider the possiblity of removing emacs22 from Debian
(unstable/testing), and so I thought I'd contact you first to see if
this is likely to be feasible before we freeze next year.
I have Cc-ed the release team.
If so, how would you prefer I
tags 547288 + wontfix
thanks
Hi Martin,
Martin Pitt schrieb:
After the recent discussion with Miriam I change my request to only
remove calibre from testing, so that it won't go into stables
until/unless the RC bugs get sorted out.
the FTP team does not remove packages from testing because
Hi RMs,
regarding this bug report: would it be an option to lower age-days for
diffutils a bit?
Cheers,
Torsten
attachment: email.vcf
Hi Adeodato,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:
- vsftpd needs a binNMU scheduled on armel
I have no idea why +b1 got rebuilt against libcap1, because libcap2
clearly got installed in the chroot. Anyway, built +b2 now successfully.
- pulseaudio FTBFS on
Hi Adeodato,
there are still some issues regarding the libcap2 transition in unstable:
- zorp needs binNMUs scheduled on all arches except armel because it
has been built with an old version of libzorp*
- vsftpd needs a binNMU scheduled on armel
- quagga fails to build on sparc that looks
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:
Thoughts? At any rate, whenever a libcap-dev 2.16-3 or higher hits
unstable, please let us know and we’ll schedule the required Bin-NMUs.
I have uploaded a new version of libcap2. Please binNMU:
libzorpll 3.0.6.4.2+nmu1
Hi Adeodato,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:
I would recommend in that case that the libcap2-dev package gets
completely dropped (and not even kept as eg. a transitional package),
provided that you make the new libcap-dev Provide: libcap2-dev, in order
Hi,
libcap is no longer maintained upstream and has been replaced by
libcap2 which is supposed to be API compatible. There are some
packages left that Build-Depend on libcap:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libcap2;users=twer...@debian.org.
My plan is to add a transitional binary
Hi,
it fixes the Debian bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507615 or the same
upstream bug https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-817.
Upgrades from Etch might break without the new patch we've got from
the upstream developers.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi,
version 3.3.7-3 fixes the RC bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512569. The patch
can be found in the bug report.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
my suggestion is to remove fpc from oldstable and stable but unblock
the unstable version 2.2.2-4 for lenny and trigger binNMUs for
lazarus. What do you think?
What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Should I
file a bug report against ftp.debian.org or is it done by the
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3
weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2
from lenny?
I had sent the following reply to the list (but not to
Hi,
the attached patch will fix Bug #503798.
Cheers,
Torsten
jboss-ser.diff
Description: application/text
Hi,
I want to upload glassfish to testing to fix bug #503775. The patch is attached.
Cheers,
Torsten
glassfish.diff
Description: application/text
Hi,
version 1.23.0-3 fixes a RC bug only.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It includes severe FHS violations and produces security problems with
this, see #475737 for reference.
I agree that it is a FHS violation that will be fixed in unstable and
that we have lived with the problem in sarge
/changelog (Revision 371)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+otrs2 (2.2.7-2lenny1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Do not load the module Apache2::Reload if it is not installed.
+(Closes: #494683)
+
+ -- Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:36:29 +0200
+
otrs2 (2.2.7-2) unstable
Hi,
I want to fix the bug through t-p-u. May I upload the package?
Cheers,
Torsten
--
http://twerner.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
version 0.95.0+1-3.2 fixes an old RC bug. The diff is available at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=enigmail-0.95.0%2B1-3.2-nmu.diff;att=1;bug=501973.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
http://twerner.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
translation. (Closes: #495780)
+ * Add russian debconf messages translation. (Closes: #495573)
+ * Add finnish debconf messages translation. (Closes: #496227)
+
+ -- Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:02:53 +0200
+
jwchat (1.0beta3-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Switch
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/icedtea-gcjwebplugin_1.0+dak1-1.html
There was some delay because of a bug in dak. I do not know if the
release team is willing to unblock the package.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
Hi,
mnogosearch 3.3.7-2 just has translation updates. The debdiff is attached.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
http://twerner.blogspot.com
debdiff
Description: Binary data
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, it would be helpful if the old Web APIs could stay around for
~2 years - which could be done by having converters for the old vs new
api.
AFAIK openstreetmap supports older APIs if possible. But
Hi,
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Giovanni Mascellani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while an out-of-date josm wouldn't work for anyone.
every Flickr client, the google data api, instant messager client that
talk proprietory protocols and probably more packages have the same
problem but we ship
Thanks,
Torsten
--
http://twerner.blogspot.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Torsten Werner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him
ASAP.
Shogun has now been built on all important architectures except hppa
where the buildd is very slow. I do not know what we can do here
Hi,
please see
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config
- /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71
That is fully broken. Who can be contacted about the problem?
Cheers,
Torsten
[shogun]
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But given that arm and mips(el) FTBFSed anyway...
the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him ASAP.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
http://twerner.blogspot.com
severity 464019 important
tags 464019 + wontfix
thanks
On Feb 10, 2008 3:54 AM, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bug #464019 should be resolved - either by changing the package name of
libmrss0, or by closing the bug as a wontfix - before these packages
should be binNMUed; otherwise I
On Dec 22, 2007 6:25 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen this problem with older shlibdeps on i386 too. Back in
November I asked Raphael Hertzog on how to fix it and he said I am doing
the right thing [1] and it builds on all archs except mips and mipsel
now. So yes I
Hi,
new (incompatible) upstream versions of libnxml and libmrss with
versioned shlibs have been uploaded. A rebuild of newsbeuter is
required because of that.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi,
it should help fixing http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427359.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
erlang has been autobuilt on mips:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=erlang;ver=1%3A11.b.4-2;arch=mips;stamp=1176246046
but the package has never reached the mirrors. What is wrong? Can it
be given back to the autobuilder?
Cheers,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
On 4/15/07, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any reason to not upgrade them all to important as of now
(and we'll probably have some release goals again, and having compiles
with gcc-x.y for all (future) x.y as goal seems like a good idea to me.
Just a note: the new
Hi,
it is yet another security fix because of an unexpected behaviour of
adduser. Adduser always sets the permission of the home dir to world
readable. Additionally the new ejabberd package restricts the
permissions of the log directory which might be wrong on existing
installations.
Thanks,
On 2/17/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This upstream update appears to include a significant number of unrelated
changes. Please isolate the security fix for an upload to t-p-u (or
testing-security).
I have isolated the rope patch for the testing package. Should I
upload the
On 2/20/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:44:48PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
I have isolated the rope patch for the testing package. Should I
upload the fixed package to testing?
Yes please.
done (and no regression in the test suite)
Torsten
--
blog
Hi,
it fixes a security bug:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-0803 and
#410864, but it is an upstream update.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On 2/14/07, Noah Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this bug also present in stable? The bug report content suggests
that it may be, though it's not tagged as such.
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22423 lists stlport5.0 and stable
ships stlport4.6 only.
Torsten
--
blog:
://www.twerner42.de/
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (.../1.0beta2-12) (Revision 2301)
+++ debian/control (.../1.0beta2-13) (Revision 2301)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
Uploaders: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper
Hi,
the package missed a Build-Depends which is fixed now in unstable.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On 1/14/07, Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/14/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, so every time a user upgrades a package, he gets to see this
message? Is that really needed?
We will fix that in future versions, but I don't think it is a problem
On 1/14/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, so every time a user upgrades a package, he gets to see this
message? Is that really needed?
We will fix that in future versions, but I don't think it is a problem
in etch because yaws was not part of sarge.
Torsten
--
blog:
Hi,
I have uploaded yaws 1.65-3 that fixes an unreported bug regarding ssl
key distribution. Please unblock it. The debdiff output is attached.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
changes.debdiff
Description: Binary data
dsc.debdiff
On 1/3/07, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because then someone cries 'iih, i don't use udev, go away with these
files'?
You can use ucf to create config files conditionally.
Regards,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To
Hello,
the package has been accepted for unstable right before the freeze.
After some arm build problems it is now ready for etch and there are
no bugs. May you accept the package for the etch release, please?
Thanks,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage:
On 12/17/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Appears to have been unblocked by Andi.
Thanks! Autobuilding non-free packages still takes a long time, though.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 12/15/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course you should upload that to unstable.
Done, but it contains 3 extra minor fixes:
- change a comment
- enable debugging symbols which is useful when the build fails
- explicitely disable java which has already automatically been
Hi,
scilab is almost ready for etch but it needs a very small patch for
the alpha build. The package is build on every architecture except
alpha. Should I upload the patched version to unstable and may you
unblock the new version, please? The actual patch is:
---
The package missed the freeze by one day and the version in unstable
fixes bug #398526. It has no open bugs other than this one.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
the changes between testing and unstable are:
* Fixed erlang-base and erlang-base-hipe prerm scripts.
(these are really minor fixes)
* Introduce erlang-depends to calculate ${erlang-*:Depends} for packages
that Build-Depend on erlang.
* Setting urgency to medium because this
Hi Steve,
2006/7/11, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:44:47PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
may you help getting erlang into testing, please?
This requires removal of those binary packages by the ftp team, then.
You'll want to file a bug against ftp.debian.org
Hello,
may you help getting erlang into testing, please? It has been build on
all architectures except m68k and 10 days are over. The binary package
erlang-base-hipe is build on 2 fewer arches then before but this was
done intentionally.
Please Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] when answering.
Thanks,
On 7/11/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This requires removal of those binary packages by the ftp team, then.
You'll want to file a bug against ftp.debian.org.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Steve Langasek wrote:
If the maintainer agrees that this package should not be included with
sarge, then it is of course reasonable to drop it (preferably with a
transition package providing an upgrade path to gnome-terminal, if that's
the appropriate replacement).
It depends on the year, when
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Torsten Werner wrote:
It depends on the year, when sarge will be released. :-) Too many people
are still using MGT today because of some of its outstanding features
that are not implemented in gnome2's terminal emulator. I will MGT for
sarge and ask for removal from
Hello,
please release scilab with sarge, because the 'grave' bug is not really
grave and I have already changed the severity.
Thanks,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
94 matches
Mail list logo
