Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-09-06 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi,

On 06-09-2022 17:34, Timo Röhling wrote:

Given that assimp was specifically binNMU-rebuilt for the new draco
version,


Sorry, I missed this part.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-09-06 Thread Timo Röhling

Hi Paul,

* Paul Gevers  [2022-09-05 21:31]:
Do I understand correctly that you think this is a test-only issue? In 
other words, they can migrate together without breaking tests, but if 
somebody would do a partial upgrade (either one of the two), there is 
no issue? In even other words, there is no *versioned* relation 
(Depends/Breaks) missing?

Given that assimp was specifically binNMU-rebuilt for the new draco
version, I would assume they should migrate together. Do you have a
scenario in mind where this would not work?


Cheers
Timo



--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling   │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄   ╰╯


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-09-05 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi Timo,

On 04-09-2022 22:41, Timo Röhling wrote:

the draco transition looks stuck because of the failing autopkgtest
with assimp from testing and draco from unstable.

That failure is caused by the renamed CMake target for the draco
library (now "draco::draco" instead of "draco_shared"). The target
name is hardcoded in the assimp CMake config at package build time
and exposed to library users, because it is a public dependency.

This means the autopkgtest uses the wrong target name if it tries to
build a test program with testing assimp and unstable draco (or vice
versa). Unless I'm missing something, this also means that both
packages can simply be migrated together to resolve the transition.


Do I understand correctly that you think this is a test-only issue? In 
other words, they can migrate together without breaking tests, but if 
somebody would do a partial upgrade (either one of the two), there is no 
issue? In even other words, there is no *versioned* relation 
(Depends/Breaks) missing?


Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-09-04 Thread Timo Röhling

Hi Sebastian,

the draco transition looks stuck because of the failing autopkgtest
with assimp from testing and draco from unstable.

That failure is caused by the renamed CMake target for the draco
library (now "draco::draco" instead of "draco_shared"). The target
name is hardcoded in the assimp CMake config at package build time
and exposed to library users, because it is a public dependency.

This means the autopkgtest uses the wrong target name if it tries to
build a test program with testing assimp and unstable draco (or vice
versa). Unless I'm missing something, this also means that both
packages can simply be migrated together to resolve the transition.


Cheers
Timo


--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling   │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄   ╰╯


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Processed: Re: Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-08-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1017740 [release.debian.org] transition: draco
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1017740: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017740
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-08-28 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2022-08-19 20:49:50 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Dear release team,
> 
> I'd like to transition draco after its SONAME bump.
> The ben file looks good:
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html
> 
> All reverse dependencies build sucessfully on amd64.

Please go ahead

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#1017740: transition: draco

2022-08-19 Thread Timo Röhling
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Dear release team,

I'd like to transition draco after its SONAME bump.
The ben file looks good:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html

All reverse dependencies build sucessfully on amd64.


Cheers
Timo


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=X4pv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-