I discussed this briefly with Adam Conrad whom knows a fair bit more
about GCC than I do.
He assured me that 4.4's i386 code would be mostly identical to 4.7's,
so there shouldn't be risk of performance regression.
So, if 4.4 is indeed staying, then it sounds like a good option to just
On 19/06/12 19:08, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 08:35:29 -0700:
I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
We should do some general performance benchmarks with 4.4 vs. 4.7 before
we consider this option. It would
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 08:35:29 -0700:
I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
We should do some general performance benchmarks with 4.4 vs. 4.7 before
we consider this option. It would be a shame to compromise the whole of
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 11:24:10 -0700:
On 19/06/12 19:08, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Nicholas Bamber's message of 2012-06-19 08:35:29 -0700:
I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
We should do some general
4 matches
Mail list logo
