Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2022 21:35:51 +0200
with message-id <yxjbf4g3dquam...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1017412: transition: spdlog
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017412,
regarding transition: spdlog
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1017412: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1017412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org, debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Ben file:
title = "spdlog";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libspdlog1" | .depends ~ "libspdlog1.10";
is_good = .depends ~ "libspdlog1.10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libspdlog1";
As per #1016418 (transition: fmtlib), #1015742 (libspdlog1: ABI breakage
without SONAME bump), I have bumped spdlog SOVERSION to 1.10, which follows
upstream upcoming changes in next release, though we have diverted the
SOVERSION for spdlog/1.10.
PS. this binary-NEW package is accepted really quickly by ftp-master.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-08-16 02:19:43 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 2:18 AM Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Ben file:
> >
> > title = "spdlog";
> > is_affected = .depends ~ "libspdlog1" | .depends ~ "libspdlog1.10";
> > is_good = .depends ~ "libspdlog1.10";
> > is_bad = .depends ~ "libspdlog1";
>
> I'm not sure how ben handles virtual package.
>
> Maybe it should be libspdlog1-fmt8 vs libspdlog1.10-fmt8.
libspdlog1 got removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
