Hi ChangZhuo,
On 03-12-2022 17:19, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
Do we need to submit transition for lxqt-globalkeys [0], which is
totally covered by liblxqt transition?
What we need is coordination, which is why transition bugs need
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi ChangZhuo,
>
> On 29-11-2022 06:29, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> > Please help to
> > migrate libfm-qt in new queue [0] so that we can prepare the migration.
>
> That's not under our control. You'll need to talk to ftp-master
Hi ChangZhuo,
On 29-11-2022 06:29, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
Please help to
migrate libfm-qt in new queue [0] so that we can prepare the migration.
That's not under our control. You'll need to talk to ftp-master
(typically a note with explanation on IRC helps).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:07:14PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28-11-2022 17:50, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> > > > All affected packages have been
Hi,
On 28-11-2022 17:50, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
All affected packages have been uploaded to unstable. Sorry for the
mess.
Thanks. Let's see if they can migrate on their
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> > All affected packages have been uploaded to unstable. Sorry for the
> > mess.
>
> Thanks. Let's see if they can migrate on their own to testing in the
> following days.
Hi,
On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
All affected packages have been uploaded to unstable. Sorry for the
mess.
Thanks. Let's see if they can migrate on their own to testing in the
following days.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:17:34PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 09:26:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Dear LXQt maintainers,
> >
> > Can you please comment on this and also elaborate how you intent to fix the
> > situation. At this moment we have a whole bunch
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 09:26:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear LXQt maintainers,
>
> On 10-11-2022 07:56, plugwash wrote:
> > It appears a liblxqt transition has started, possiblly inadvertantly.
> >
> > Back in June, Simon Quigley prepared an update of the lxqt stack. He
> > announced
> >
Dear LXQt maintainers,
On 10-11-2022 07:56, plugwash wrote:
It appears a liblxqt transition has started, possiblly inadvertantly.
Back in June, Simon Quigley prepared an update of the lxqt stack. He announced
that he intended to update the stack in unstable, but only actually did so in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
It appears a liblxqt transition has started, possiblly inadvertantly.
Back in June, Simon Quigley prepared an update of the lxqt stack. He announced
that he intended to update the stack
11 matches
Mail list logo