Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-12-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi ChangZhuo, On 03-12-2022 17:19, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: Do we need to submit transition for lxqt-globalkeys [0], which is totally covered by liblxqt transition? What we need is coordination, which is why transition bugs need

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-12-03 Thread 陳昌倬
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 07:33:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi ChangZhuo, > > On 29-11-2022 06:29, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > > Please help to > > migrate libfm-qt in new queue [0] so that we can prepare the migration. > > That's not under our control. You'll need to talk to ftp-master

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-29 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi ChangZhuo, On 29-11-2022 06:29, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: Please help to migrate libfm-qt in new queue [0] so that we can prepare the migration. That's not under our control. You'll need to talk to ftp-master (typically a note with explanation on IRC helps). Paul OpenPGP_signature

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-28 Thread 陳昌倬
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:07:14PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 28-11-2022 17:50, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > > > > All affected packages have been

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-28 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 28-11-2022 17:50, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: All affected packages have been uploaded to unstable. Sorry for the mess. Thanks. Let's see if they can migrate on their

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-28 Thread 陳昌倬
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 09:58:48PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > > All affected packages have been uploaded to unstable. Sorry for the > > mess. > > Thanks. Let's see if they can migrate on their own to testing in the > following days.

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 21-11-2022 01:05, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: All affected packages have been uploaded to unstable. Sorry for the mess. Thanks. Let's see if they can migrate on their own to testing in the following days. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-20 Thread 陳昌倬
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 11:17:34PM +0800, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 09:26:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Dear LXQt maintainers, > > > > Can you please comment on this and also elaborate how you intent to fix the > > situation. At this moment we have a whole bunch

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-18 Thread 陳昌倬
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 09:26:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Dear LXQt maintainers, > > On 10-11-2022 07:56, plugwash wrote: > > It appears a liblxqt transition has started, possiblly inadvertantly. > > > > Back in June, Simon Quigley prepared an update of the lxqt stack. He > > announced > >

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear LXQt maintainers, On 10-11-2022 07:56, plugwash wrote: It appears a liblxqt transition has started, possiblly inadvertantly. Back in June, Simon Quigley prepared an update of the lxqt stack. He announced that he intended to update the stack in unstable, but only actually did so in

Bug#1023787: transition: liblxqt

2022-11-09 Thread plugwash
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition It appears a liblxqt transition has started, possiblly inadvertantly. Back in June, Simon Quigley prepared an update of the lxqt stack. He announced that he intended to update the stack