On 2023-12-11 16:57:34 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:36:38PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > OK, but what is your suggestion? Reverting and have broken tests due to
> > > the pandoc issue?
> >
> > pandoc is fixed in unstable.
>
> Really? Salsa CI[1] says:
>
Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:36:38PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > OK, but what is your suggestion? Reverting and have broken tests due to
> > the pandoc issue?
>
> pandoc is fixed in unstable.
Really? Salsa CI[1] says:
pandoc : Depends: pandoc-data (>= 3.0.1+ds) but 3.0.1-3 is to be
On 2023-12-11 13:28:59 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:29:24AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
> > > > the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for
> >
Hi Sebastian,
Am Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:29:24AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
> > > the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for
> > > building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm,
Hi Andreas
On 2023-12-07 16:09:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I have no idea how to work around this.
> >
> > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a
On 9 December 2023 at 01:06, Charles Plessy wrote:
| I do not know for r-bioc-netsam, but for r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db and similar
| packages, it is because it is an "annotation package" made of data and
| therefore not managed the same way as the other Bioconductor packages.
|
| This is why it
Hi Graham and Andreas,
Le Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100, Graham Inggs a écrit :
>
> Also, why do r-bioc-netsam and r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db not even appear on
> the tracker?
I do not know for r-bioc-netsam, but for r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db and similar
packages, it is because it is an "annotation
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
>...
> > Also, why do r-bioc-netsam and r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db not even appear on
> > the tracker?
>
> I was always wondering about this but I have no clue.
Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 04:09:28PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> I'll take this
> occurence as a reason to fail with an error in dh-r to avoid such cases
> in future.
Done in
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/commit/e4c348832b3d99ba7bc8f7670085b9b21323f7b6
The check could be even
Hi Graham,
Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I have no idea how to work around this.
>
> I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
> the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea how to work around this.
I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in
the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for
building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm,
On 2023-12-03 23:14:03 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:46:31AM -0100, Graham Inggs wrote:
> >...
> > This is probably a good example for why new packages should be
> > uploaded to experimental first, instead of directly to unstable.
> >...
>
> Not really.
>
> It is rare
Hi Adrian,
Am Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:15:49PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > And it also means that r-bioc-biocgenerics is now blocked on the haskell
> > transition. Lovely. Good thing that pandoc is supposed to be the last piece
> > in that several months long transition.
>
> It's only blocked
Hi,
Am Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:51:38PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>
> And it also means that r-bioc-biocgenerics is now blocked on the haskell
> transition. Lovely. Good thing that pandoc is supposed to be the last piece
> in that several months long transition.
... which on the other hand
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:51:38PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> And it also means that r-bioc-biocgenerics is now blocked on the haskell
> transition. Lovely. Good thing that pandoc is supposed to be the last piece
> in that several months long transition.
It's only blocked by the pandoc part
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 09:46:31AM -0100, Graham Inggs wrote:
>...
> This is probably a good example for why new packages should be
> uploaded to experimental first, instead of directly to unstable.
>...
Not really.
It is rare that a new source package takes over a binary package from
another
Hi,
On 03-12-2023 11:46, Graham Inggs wrote:
This seems to be due to the restructuring of src:pandoc [1].
src:haskell-pandoc [2] recently cleared NEW into unstable, and the
updated src:pandoc has not been uploaded yet.
This is probably a good example for why new packages should be
uploaded to
Hi Andreas
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Charles Plessy and I uploaded r-bioc-* packages until level 11.
> Unfortunately building of some packages seems to be blocked for
>
> A: some pandoc dependency reason
> pandoc depends on missing:
> -
Hi,
Charles Plessy and I uploaded r-bioc-* packages until level 11.
Unfortunately building of some packages seems to be blocked for
A: some pandoc dependency reason
pandoc depends on missing:
- pandoc-data:amd64 (< 2.17.1.1-3.~)
19 matches
Mail list logo
