Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:24:59AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? Were those deprecated sysfs features dropped from the kernel or could they still be

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:24:59AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:   It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? Were

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 13, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: Were those deprecated sysfs features dropped from the kernel or could they still be activated even on newer ones, although they are disabled by default? This would probably break udev. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-13 Thread Philipp Kern
Hallo Vincent, am Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:50:47AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: I'm unsure about the newer 2.6.30 kernel, but for 2.6.28/2.6.29, they are simply disabled by default. They are also disabled on all debian kernel images post-lenny. The thing is that pmount is for

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

2009-10-12 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ Donkey: No one told me I had the right to