On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 18:13:03 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
Would it be fine to close the FTBFS/unresolved dependency RC bugs on the
various plugins in unstable now?
Which bugs is this about, and are they resolved? I must admit I haven't
kept track.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 09:26:40PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 20:58:07 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Uploading this would make it possible to potentially transition the barry
and
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 20:58:07 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Uploading this would make it possible to potentially transition the barry
and
synce-sync-engine packages (which I believe were removed due to opensync),
as
well as
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 09:26:40PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 20:58:07 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Uploading this would make it possible to potentially transition the barry
and
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 20:58:07 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Uploading this would make it possible to potentially transition the barry and
synce-sync-engine packages (which I believe were removed due to opensync), as
well as the currently still at 0.22 kdepim plugin and the multisync0.90
Package: release.debian.org
I have finally found time earlier this week to revert opensync packaging
to the stable 0.2x branch, and I would like to propose this as a way to
ship opensync to our users. This would make users of Blackberry (via
barry) and Windows Mobile (via synce-sync-engine)
6 matches
Mail list logo
