On Sun, 2015-12-27 13:49:02 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now the stats read:
> Built: 417
> Failed: 112
> OK: 304
>
> To get forward, I drafted some MBF announcement on the Titanpad. Would
> be cool if some can check it and maybe improve it (writing is not my
> strength)
>
>
Dear all,
rebuilt is now complete.
The final stats are:
Built: 463*
Failed: 117
OK: 346
The summary is also here: https://libpng.sviech.de/!summary.txt
On the same server are also the complete buildlogs:
https://libpng.sviech.de/
I will no proceed with the preparations of the MBF
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 14:25:29 +0100 Pedretti Fabio wrote:
> Hi, I could provide a fast server (16+ xeon cores, 32gb+ ram)
accessible
> via ssh for test rebuild. If it can be useful let me know.
> Il 27/dic/2015 14:08, "Tobias Frost" ha scritto:
>
> >
Hi,
Now the stats read:
Built: 417
Failed: 112
OK: 304
To get forward, I drafted some MBF announcement on the Titanpad. Would
be cool if some can check it and maybe improve it (writing is not my
strength)
https://titanpad.com/libpng16-transistion
In the draft propose the following plan:
0.
Hi, I could provide a fast server (16+ xeon cores, 32gb+ ram) accessible
via ssh for test rebuild. If it can be useful let me know.
Il 27/dic/2015 14:08, "Tobias Frost" ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Now the stats read:
> Built: 417
> Failed: 112
> OK: 304
>
> To get forward, I drafted
> After building 288 packages some intermediate result:
>
> 288 built
> 85 failed
> 200 built ok
> (3 currently rebuilding due some BD needed to be rebuilt themselves
> too)
>
> Short analysis of the build errors are on this titanpad:
> https://titanpad.com/libpng16-transistion
> I will continue
After building 288 packages some intermediate result:
288 built
85 failed
200 built ok
(3 currently rebuilding due some BD needed to be rebuilt themselves
too)
Short analysis of the build errors are on this titanpad:
https://titanpad.com/libpng16-transistion
I will continue update the pad with
Am Freitag, den 25.12.2015, 20:28 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste:
>
> There's one game from this list for which nobody should waste time
> on: freecraft.
Noted on the pad*. Thanks Alexandre
* anyone feel free to add such notes to the pad themselves...
Hi,
I see *many* packages are failing to build because of completely unrelated
reasons (e.g. insighttoolkit4 and gambas3),
and many of them needs some rebuilds to see if everything works (e.g. freetype6
rdeps).
However something like 80 packages, with many of them just needing a few tweaks
Hi Nobuhiro,
Am Mittwoch, den 23.12.2015, 05:29 +0900 schrieb Nobuhiro Iwamatsu:
> Hi Tobias, Gianfranco and Emilio.
>
> Thanks for your help!
> Sorry, about this transition.
>
> I don't upload libpng16 with providing libpng-dev now. Because Depend
> of libpng
> is very large and effect for
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:12:31 +0100 Tobias Frost
wrote:
> I'm currently rebuilding all reverse B-Ds (on libpng-dev and
libpng12-
> dev), but this will still take a few days to complete (currently done
> ~150packages out of ~450) to sasess the situation -- A summary will
be
>
Hi Tobias, Gianfranco and Emilio.
Thanks for your help!
Sorry, about this transition.
I don't upload libpng16 with providing libpng-dev now. Because Depend of libpng
is very large and effect for system is large too.
I was considering to gradually transition in a way that was proposed by Michael.
Dear Release Team,
I restart transition of libpng version 1.2(libpng12) to libpng version
1.6 (libpng16).
Sorry about late this work.
I previously had proposed the replacement of libpng12 and libpng16.
But because libpng has a lot of dependent package, there was pointed out that
it is difficult
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #650601
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release-team,
can you please update the transition tracker to libpng16?
Thanks!
Tobi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
On 21/12/15 09:38, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Followup-For: Bug #650601
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release-team,
>
> can you please update the transition tracker to libpng16?
Done (it may take an hour for the page to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Emilio,
> It helps if you Cc the necessary addresses...
I didn't cc the necessary addresses on purpose (see below).
> Before starting anything, please coordinate with the right people,
> prepare a plan (e.g. make libpng16-dev provide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:49:23 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #650601 User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
>
> Dear libpng maintainers,
>
> how's about
On 20/12/15 17:12, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:49:23 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #650601 User:
>> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
>
>> Dear libpng maintainers,
It helps if you
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #650601
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear libpng maintainers,
how's about starting the transistion NOW?
(I also volunteer to help out; bonus: I'm gonna have a few days off after the
christmas...)
--
tobi
--
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:45:14PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
2012/6/27 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
I am still correcting FTBFS.
However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
May I upload libpng
Hi,
2012/6/27 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
I am still correcting FTBFS.
However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
May I upload libpng 1.5 to unstable?
Absolutely not.
OK. Does that already mean that it
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Hi,
I am still correcting FTBFS.
However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
May I upload libpng 1.5 to unstable?
Absolutely not.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I am still correcting FTBFS.
However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
May I upload libpng 1.5 to unstable?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libpng15-transition;users=lib...@packages.debian.org
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2012/5/22 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 15:33:07 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:48:55PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
I am working with Anibal about package which supports libpng12 and 15 both.
This already upload to experimental.
Hello,
Please review libpng/1.5.10-3
Hi,
I misunderstood.
I am working with Anibal about package which supports libpng12 and 15 both.
This already upload to experimental.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2012/4/19 Julien Cristau jul...@cristau.org:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:01:28 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
However, when libpng15
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:48:55PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
I am working with Anibal about package which supports libpng12 and 15 both.
This already upload to experimental.
Hello,
Please review libpng/1.5.10-3 in experimental.
I've built lots of packages to test a smooth transition to
2012/4/5 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 08:17:29 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Yes, libopng maintainers will upload libpng1.5 and libpng1.2 to
unstable on this week.
What? At least I don't want another copy of libpng in wheezy without a
plan to get rid of the
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 16:01:28 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
However, when libpng15 is installed in unstable instead of libpng12,
it will be in
the state where many packages depending on libpng12 do not operate.
Is the way which enabled it to install libpng12 and libpng15
simultaneously
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 08:17:29 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Yes, libopng maintainers will upload libpng1.5 and libpng1.2 to
unstable on this week.
What? At least I don't want another copy of libpng in wheezy without a
plan to get rid of the other one.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Hi, Michael.
Sorry, reply was late, and thanks for your comment.
2012/3/5 Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org:
On 25.02.2012 21:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (05/12/2011):
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
First, we had better upload
Hi, Tobias.
Thanks for your comment.
2012/3/20 Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de:
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 07:33:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
How does that sound?
I'd rather get as many FTBFS against libpng 1.5 bugs as possible fixed
now.
Hi,
Am 04.04.2012 01:15, schrieb Nobuhiro Iwamatsu:
I am working about this with Anibal. We will upload libpng1.5 this week.
Please keep in mind that I'm not a member of the release team.
So please wait for an ack from the release team before making any
uploads to unstable.
Cheers,
Michael
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 07:33:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
How does that sound?
I'd rather get as many FTBFS against libpng 1.5 bugs as possible fixed
now. Then after wheezy make the actual switch.
Cheers,
Julien
Is that the current plan
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 07:33:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
How does that sound?
I'd rather get as many FTBFS against libpng 1.5 bugs as possible fixed
now. Then after wheezy make the actual switch.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 25.02.2012 21:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (05/12/2011):
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
First, we had better upload libpng15, after changing libpng12-dev
into libpng-dev. Surely, I think that this method is easy for
Two more points:
On 05.03.2012 07:33, Michael Biebl wrote:
What about the following:
- Make libpng12 and libpng15 co-installable, by using different source
package names, e.g. src:libpng and src:libpng15
- src:libpng12 builds libpng12-dev, src:libpng15 builds libpng15-dev
- upload *both*
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (05/12/2011):
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
First, we had better upload libpng15, after changing libpng12-dev
into libpng-dev. Surely, I think that this method is easy for
shift.
We appear to have different
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
2011/12/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:16:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5.
libpng of ABI and API has been changed by change of 1.2 to
Hi,
2011/12/6 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 16:34 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
2011/12/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:16:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5.
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:43:16AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 23:34:37 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
If the API has changed, as Nobuhiro states above, it would be
incorrect for the new -dev package to provide the old, wouldn't it?
No. It would only be
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@debian.org writes:
And it is necessary to change Build-depends of almost all packages
into libpng-dev from libpng12-dev. The present status is as follows.
[...]
tuxonice-userui: FTBFS 648125
I wrote a patch and have a package ready to upload as soon as
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:30:19AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:16:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5.
libpng of ABI and API has been changed by change of 1.2 to 1.5, so it
needs a transition from libopng12 to
Hi,
2011/12/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:16:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5.
libpng of ABI and API has been changed by change of 1.2 to 1.5, so it
needs a transition from libopng12 to libpng15.
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 23:34:37 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
If the API has changed, as Nobuhiro states above, it would be
incorrect for the new -dev package to provide the old, wouldn't it?
No. It would only be incorrect if the plan was to keep libpng12-dev
around as a real package.
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:16:41 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5.
libpng of ABI and API has been changed by change of 1.2 to 1.5, so it
needs a transition from libopng12 to libpng15.
We tested building of the package depending on libpng12.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi Release Team,
Libpng maintainers want to update libpng from 1.2 to 1.5.
libpng of ABI and API has been changed by change of 1.2 to 1.5, so it
needs a transition from libopng12 to
46 matches
Mail list logo