Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-04 Thread Reinhard Tartler
tags 683247 -moreinfo retitle 683247 unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6 stop On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On 30.07.2012 08:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I intend to work on a new upload that incorporates your suggestions for clarifying the

Processed: Re: Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 683247 -moreinfo Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock libav Removed tag(s) moreinfo. retitle 683247 unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6 Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock libav Changed Bug title to 'unblock libav_6:0.8.3-6' from 'unblock

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-08-01 10:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-08-01 Thread Stepan Golosunov
01.08.2012 в 09:45:12 +0100 Adam D. Barratt написал: On 01.08.2012 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: So, will libav 6:0.8.3-5 get unblocked or should we request this separately? The libav discussion moved to (the cloned) #683247, where Reinhard said he was going to upload -6. That bug also

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Reinhard Tartler
clone 683030 -1 retitle -1 unblock libav block 683030 by -1 tag -1 moreinfo stop On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an

Processed: Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 683030 -1 Bug #683030 [release.debian.org] unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1 Bug 683030 cloned as bug 683247 retitle -1 unblock libav Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1 Changed Bug title to 'unblock libav' from 'unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1'

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Dear Adam, Am 29.07.2012 23:16, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: I did not apply this change but recognize it from Emdebian sprint: Reason is, I believe, to ease bootstrapping new architectures by suppressing build of arch-all packages. Jonas is right. The main reason for this change was to make it

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: - the changelog also doesn't mention the dropping of the ffmpeg Provides. This was also my change, I am sorry this slipped through without proper documentation. However, this field was so utterly wrong in that libav-tools simply does not provide

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[BCCed to the vlc bug for info; let's move discussion to the libav clone] On 30.07.2012 08:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all packages are not allowed to specify Multi-Arch: foreign, so I had the impression that this part was rather obvious to multi-arch experts. Which I am clearly not, so being more explicit in the

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all packages are not allowed to specify Multi-Arch: foreign, so I had the impression that this part was rather obvious to multi-arch experts. Which I am

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:01:20 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all packages are not allowed to specify Multi-Arch: foreign, so I had the impression

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:16:07 +0200 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:01:20 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all

Bug#683247: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: This means that for an Architecture: all package to satisfy the dependencies of a foreign-architecture package, it must be marked Multi-Arch: foreign or Multi-Arch: allowed.

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 22:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 12-07-28 at 04:47pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - this change looks slightly odd: * Do not run doxygen if it is not installed. doxygen is in B-D-Indep and only appears to be used when building the arch:all -doc package.

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Depends: vlc libav (not considered) The new libav does not have an unblock request ttbomk and from a quick look at the diff I'm not prepared to unblock it without at least some discussion (there are changes which don't appear to

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-28 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-07-28 at 04:47pm, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - this change looks slightly odd: * Do not run doxygen if it is not installed. doxygen is in B-D-Indep and only appears to be used when building the arch:all -doc package. On that basis, why would it not always be installed when

Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1

2012-07-27 Thread Benjamin Drung
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package vlc VLC 2.0.3 is a bug fix release of upstreams 2.0.x maintanence branch. It contains a bunch of fixes. You can review them in our git repository [1]. There are