Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:42:11 +0200
with message-id <501656f3.7060...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683200: unblock: ganeti/2.5.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683200,
regarding unblock: ganeti/2.5.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683200: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683200
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ganeti

Hi release team,

I would kindly ask you to unblock the ganeti package. As upstream, we
have released version 2.5.2 especially to fix the outstanding issues
that ganeti has in testing (and that were fixable without invasive
changes). You can see the upstream commits here:

  
http://git.ganeti.org/?p=ganeti.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v2.5.2;hp=refs/tags/v2.5.1

The debdiff between testing and unstable is a bit more hairy due to the
HTML doc being regenerated, so I won't include it; let me know if you
want to take a look at it. Beside the upstream changes, on the debian
packaging side there are two extra changes:

- a patch to fix the -no-kvm parameter (not upstreamed yet)
- a fix to dh_installinit invocation (the fix for #677674)

Let me know if unblocking is possible or not. Thanks!

unblock ganeti/2.5.2-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.23-ruru1 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: severity 677674 grave

On 2012-07-29 21:07, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package ganeti
> 
> Hi release team,
> 

Hi,

> I would kindly ask you to unblock the ganeti package. As upstream, we
> have released version 2.5.2 especially to fix the outstanding issues
> that ganeti has in testing (and that were fixable without invasive
> changes). You can see the upstream commits here:
> 
>   
> http://git.ganeti.org/?p=ganeti.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v2.5.2;hp=refs/tags/v2.5.1
> 
> The debdiff between testing and unstable is a bit more hairy due to the
> HTML doc being regenerated, so I won't include it; let me know if you
> want to take a look at it. Beside the upstream changes, on the debian
> packaging side there are two extra changes:
> 

For the next time, use debdiff | filterdiff to exclude the
auto-generated docs.  Be sure to mention the use of filterdiff and what
was filtered so we are aware of it when we check the diff on our side.
Anyhow, it makes reviewing the changes a lot easier.

> - a patch to fix the -no-kvm parameter (not upstreamed yet)
> - a fix to dh_installinit invocation (the fix for #677674)
> 

I have bumped #677674 to grave (as it affects testing), so it stays on
our radar in case ganeti/2.5.2-1 does not migrate.

> Let me know if unblocking is possible or not. Thanks!
> 
> unblock ganeti/2.5.2-1
> 
> [...]

Unblocked, though I am giving it an extra 5 days in unstable before
letting it migrate.  Thanks for the fixes.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to