Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2014-01-21 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Guido Günther wrote (10 Oct 2013 15:22:45 GMT) : On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [..snip..] For the record, we tend to prefer having debdiff (or at least debian changelogs) posted to the BTS. Right now I have absolutely no idea which bugs you're trying

Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:52:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi, Am 10.10.2013 17:22, schrieb Guido Günther: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [..snip..] For the record, we tend to prefer having debdiff (or at least debian changelogs) posted to the

Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, Am 10.10.2013 17:22, schrieb Guido Günther: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [..snip..] For the record, we tend to prefer having debdiff (or at least debian changelogs) posted to the BTS. Right now I have absolutely no idea which bugs you're trying to get

Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-15 Thread Guido Günther
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 06:52:57PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: [..snip..] So I'd like a clear advice from the security what to do about CVE-2013-4288 (Bug: #723717) in policykit-1/stable: a/ Fix via stable-security b/ Fix via stabe c/ Ignore (not important enough). I'm happy to do either

Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-10 Thread Guido Günther
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, to ease the porting of libvirt patches for Debian's stable branch (0.9.12) we created upstream a v0.9.12-maint branch containing what we (as in Debian) cherry picked from upstream already

Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 wheezy Guido Günther a...@sigxcpu.org (2013-10-10): Any chance we could switch to 0.9.12.2 for the next (or after that) point release? Certainly not for the next point release, due this weekend, and frozen past weekend. This also contains the somewhat complex backport for

Processed: Re: Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tag -1 wheezy Bug #725968 [release.debian.org] pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1 Added tag(s) wheezy. -- 725968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#725968: pu: package libvirt/0.9.12.2-1

2013-10-10 Thread Guido Günther
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 03:38:33PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [..snip..] For the record, we tend to prefer having debdiff (or at least debian changelogs) posted to the BTS. Right now I have absolutely no idea which bugs you're trying to get fixed, and whether fixes landed in testing or