Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:11:09 +0100
with message-id <b41a97ce-5f3c-9fba-88f1-afb838b3f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#842846: New ros-vision-opencv transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #842846,
regarding transition: ros-vision-opencv
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
842846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842846
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ros-vision-opencv. It is
in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built
previously.
Ben file:
title = "ros-vision-opencv";
is_affected = .depends ~
/\b(libcv\-bridge1d|cl\-opencv\-apps|libcv\-bridge0d|libopencv\-apps\-dev|libopencv\-apps0d|opencv\-apps\-tools|python\-opencv\-apps)\b/
is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libcv\-bridge1d)\b/
is_bad = .depends ~
/\b(cl\-opencv\-apps|libcv\-bridge0d|libopencv\-apps\-dev|libopencv\-apps0d|opencv\-apps\-tools|python\-opencv\-apps)\b/
All reverse dependencies test rebuilds. All rdepends are listed here:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ros-vision-opencv.html
--
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 05/11/16 10:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/11/16 23:30, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>> El dimarts, 1 de novembre de 2016, a les 19:49:35 CET, Emilio Pozuelo
>> Monfort
>> va escriure:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On 01/11/16 19:13, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>
>>>> Dear Release Team,
>>>>
>>>> I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ros-vision-opencv. It is
>>>> in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built
>>>> previously.
>>>
>>> Go ahead.
>>>
>>> BTW I'm happy if you skip the transition bug when only a small number of
>>> rdeps are involved and you maintain all of them (like in this case). Of
>>> course if you want to file the bug and wait for an ack, that is fine too!
>>>
>> Thx,
>>
>> just following the normal procedure. Although I agree that it's a bit heavy
>> in
>> these cases.
>
> This needs an update to ros-metapackages for the dropped binaries.
That's done.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
