Please also binNMU libaio-ocaml in experimental.
Thanks
Andreas
On 09/10/2017 21:45, Ximin Luo wrote:
That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone
from the ocaml team handling these, or should I?
I am handling these.
Would it be possible to prioritize the rebuilds of lwt and ocaml-ctypes?
They seem to be in the
Simon McVittie:
> Control: block 871469 by 877548
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 10:05:02 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is
>>> someone
>>> from the ocaml team handling
Processing control commands:
> block 871469 by 877548
Bug #871469 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml
871469 was not blocked by any bugs.
871469 was blocking: 876570 876752
Added blocking bug(s) of 871469: 877548
--
871469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871469
Debian Bug
Control: block 871469 by 877548
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 at 10:05:02 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is
> > someone
> > from the ocaml team handling these, or should I?
>
> I
On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone
from the ocaml team handling these, or should I?
I am handling these.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
On 14/09/17 15:44, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Stéphane Glondu:
>> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>> [...]
ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to
experimental and build fine on all architectures [3].
>>>
So,
Hi.
While Build-Depends-Arch is supported since Standards-Version 4.0.0, the
transition seems to be running without build-depends-arch in the
"Affected:" pattern.
Is that OK?
If it's OK, sorry for the noise.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Stéphane Glondu:
> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>> [...]
>>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to
>>> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3].
>>
>>> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started
On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> [...]
>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to
>> experimental and build fine on all architectures [3].
>
>> So, basically, this transition is ready to be started from my point of
>> view.
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 08/08/17 10:32, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> We would like to update ocaml from 4.02.3 to 4.05.0. This is 3 major
> releases
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #871469 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
871469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
We would like to update ocaml from 4.02.3 to 4.05.0. This is 3 major
releases (and 2 years) ahead.
With current unstable, on amd64:
- 9 source uploads (at least) are
13 matches
Mail list logo
