On 12/11/17 16:44, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> I've finished testing and the new poco is in experimental. Would it be ok to
> upload it to unstable, to transition directly to that one?
Sure, go ahead.
Emilio
I've finished testing and the new poco is in experimental. Would it be
ok to upload it to unstable, to transition directly to that one?
The new Ben file would be:
title = "poco";
is_affected = .depends ~
/\b(libpococrypto48|libpocodata48|libpocodatamysql48|libpocodataodbc48|libpocodatasqlite48
* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2017-11-10 08:19]:
I would like to transition the new poco release to unstable. I
recompiled the reverse dependencies and found no problems. Note that
the last upload to experimental failed to build on s390x because of a
wonky unit test (it was compiling fine before).
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 10/11/17 05:33, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to transition the new poco release to unstable. I
> recompiled the reverse depen
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #881330 [release.debian.org] transition: poco
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
881330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881330
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to transition the new poco release to unstable. I
recompiled the reverse dependencies and found no problems. Note that
the last upload to experimental failed to build on
6 matches
Mail list logo
