Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2020-12-07 Thread Samuel Henrique
Hello Vagrant, On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 02:48, Vagrant Cascadian < vagr...@reproducible-builds.org> wrote: > On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently > > 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible > >

Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2020-12-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:46:18PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently > > 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible > > builds, as they were built with an old dpkg

Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2020-12-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Vagrant On 04-12-2020 03:46, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote: >> I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently >> 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible >> builds, as they were built with an old dpkg version not

Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2020-12-03 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2019-03-05, Holger Levsen wrote: > I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently > 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible > builds, as they were built with an old dpkg version not producing > .buildinfo files. I ran it just now, and we're

Bug#900837: update on mass-rebuild of packages for reproducible builds

2019-03-05 Thread Holger Levsen
control: block -1 by 894441 thanks as outlined in https://lists.debian.org/<2019030510.i3jcqnku6qhd3...@layer-acht.org> I ran Chris's script again on coccia, with the result that currently 6084 source packages in the archive need a rebuild for reproducible builds, as they were built with an