Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-08 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-03-08 18:54:22 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Please upload to unstable. As said, we'll let it age a bit there. Thanks, uploaded. > Paul Sebastian

Processed: Re: Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #983071 [release.debian.org] unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 983071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi, On 04-03-2021 12:32, Paul Gevers wrote: > What I *think* we're going to do is accept the package in unstable, but > have it age a bit in unstable before unblocking (which is going to > happen automatically due to the hard freeze). Please upload to unstable. As

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-04 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-03-04 12:32:48 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sebastian Hi, > Can you please send a debdiff where you undo the renaming (where > applicable), such that we get a better understanding of the real changes? Sure. Please find attached. > What I *think* we're going to do is accept the

Processed: Re: Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #983071 [release.debian.org] unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 983071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sebastian On 02-03-2021 21:55, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> Unfortunately we haven't made up our mind yet, but to get some (albeit >> limited) exposure and autopkgtest coverage (via the pseudo-excuses) [2], >> I think your chances for a go are higher if the

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-02 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-03-02 19:44:58 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Paul, > Unfortunately we haven't made up our mind yet, but to get some (albeit > limited) exposure and autopkgtest coverage (via the pseudo-excuses) [2], > I think your chances for a go are higher if the proposed package is >

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sebastian, On 18-02-2021 23:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Please unblock package xz-utils. xz-utils is listed on our (build-)essential list [1]. Because the package is potentially influencing the build artifacts, we're reluctant to allow changes at this moment because corner case use

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-02-18 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package xz-utils. I NMUed xz-utils to 5.2.5-1.0 fixing a few bugs including #844770 and #975981. Both bugs were fixed by upstream differently / more complete. I prepared an