Paul Wise writes:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:30 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
>> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 21:04 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> > Additionally OpenSSL is considered system library, see
>> > https://bugs.debian.org/951780
>> > https://bugs.debian.org/972181
>>
>> Even if that
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:30 AM Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 21:04 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Additionally OpenSSL is considered system library, see
> > https://bugs.debian.org/951780
> > https://bugs.debian.org/972181
>
> Even if that interpretation holds, and
On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 21:04 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2021-10-05 20:03:49 [+0200], Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Hi Kurt, hi Luca, hi everyone,
> Hi Michael,
>
> > That said, I'm not a lawyer and reading license texts hurts my brain.
> > So my goal is is mainly to raise awareness of
On 2021-10-05 20:03:49 [+0200], Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi Kurt, hi Luca, hi everyone,
Hi Michael,
> That said, I'm not a lawyer and reading license texts hurts my brain.
> So my goal is is mainly to raise awareness of this issue and seek input from
> the community.
GPL code which linked against
Hi Kurt, hi Luca, hi everyone,
regarding the impending transition to OpenSSL 3.0 in unstable (which is
now licensed under Apache 2.0), I wonder what that means for Debian,
given that apparently GPL-2 (and also LGPL-2) and Apache 2.0 are
incompatible with each other.
If I read Luca
5 matches
Mail list logo
