On Sun, 2013-01-13 at 01:56 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 04:38:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 21:56 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
+apt-show-versions (0.16+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix bug which
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 21:56 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the codebase:
-my @official_suites = qw(oldstable stable proposed-updates
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 04:38:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 21:56 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 09:56:34PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the codebase:
-my @official_suites = qw(oldstable stable
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the codebase:
-my @official_suites = qw(oldstable stable proposed-updates testing
unstable);
+my @official_suites = qw(oldstable
Hi
Am 29.10.2012 23:01, schrieb Philipp Kern:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the codebase:
[…]
also the added apt hook/setting is a behaviour change if it's
Christoph,
am Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:54:21AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
Am 29.10.2012 23:01, schrieb Philipp Kern:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:44:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
From a very quick scan and with apologies if I'm missing something
due to unfamiliarity with the codebase:
[…]
also the added apt hook/setting is a behaviour change if it's suddenly
called post-apt. Such a change is not
On 24.10.2012 17:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 24.10.2012 17:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 24.10.2012 17:20, Christoph Martin wrote:
please also push the update to stable-updates because it fixes the
following bug :
It needs to get in to proposed-updates first, which means we need to
review
Am 24.10.2012 18:44, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On 24.10.2012 17:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 24.10.2012 17:20, Christoph Martin wrote:
please also push the update to stable-updates because it fixes the
following bug :
It needs to get in to proposed-updates first, which means we need to
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 20:53 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
Thanks for the hint. But I think it should be stable-updates instead of
squeeze-updates
The suite is called squeeze-updates in the database. :-) The Release
file does indeed use stable-updates as the suite name though, for
consistency.
Hi,
please also push the update to stable-updates because it fixes the
following bug :
Fix bug which caused squeeze-updates and squeeze to mask each other
(closes: #623252)
This is a major problem in squeeze..
Thanks
Christoph
---BeginMessage---
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
On 24.10.2012 17:20, Christoph Martin wrote:
please also push the update to stable-updates because it fixes the
following bug :
It needs to get in to proposed-updates first, which means we need to
review it.
Having spotted it appearing in stable-new, I was about to e-mail you
anyway - the
On 24.10.2012 17:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 24.10.2012 17:20, Christoph Martin wrote:
please also push the update to stable-updates because it fixes the
following bug :
It needs to get in to proposed-updates first, which means we need to
review it.
From a very quick scan and with
14 matches
Mail list logo
