Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 06:56 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:53:36 (CET), Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): [...] If that's too much hassle for you, I can prepare a patch, or even do an upload. Reinhard, ping? Would

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-15 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-15 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:53:36 (CET), Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, November 8, 2010 07:06, Reinhard Tartler wrote: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 22:03:41 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote: We are currently really not able to accept rc3 in Squeeze because rc3 never migrated (since April *2009*). If you are not able to provide security support for it during

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new package with a minimal fix for #601506. Hmmm,

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 11/08/2010 06:22 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org): Well, that's really not fair. Translators could ask the Release Team whether it is relevant to consider translating/updating a $package, I don't really understand where's your point, Mehdi. What we're talking about is mostly my own energy or Reinhard's

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-11-07 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 22:03:41 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 10/22/2010 08:50 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I have to admit that I noticed too late that the rc3 version didn't make it to testing because of the missing build; I just assumed rc3 was already in and don't really remember

Re: Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-10-22 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Hi, While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build on armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.install

Please consider unblocking boxbackup_0.11~rc3~r2502-4

2010-10-16 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Hi, While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build on armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.install files, which is rectified in the new upload, even for