On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 03:30 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 680670 with 688793
Bug #680670 {Done: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org} [obnam] obnam:
add_key doesn't encrypt symmetric key with new key
680670 was not blocked
On 2012-09-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
How is the unblock request blocking the fixing of the bug? The bug is
already fixed and it's not even blocking the transition of the fix,
given that the unblock was added.
True, it doesn't. However, there was nothing in the bug report here
refering to the
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 09:56 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
On 2012-09-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
How is the unblock request blocking the fixing of the bug? The bug is
already fixed and it's not even blocking the transition of the fix,
given that the unblock was added.
True, it doesn't.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 680670 with 688793
Bug #680670 {Done: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org} [obnam] obnam:
add_key doesn't encrypt symmetric key with new key
680670 was not blocked by any bugs.
680670 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of
4 matches
Mail list logo