On 03/29/2011 08:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi release team,
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/
look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing
instance instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would
that be possible?
Can you
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2011, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
On 03/29/2011 08:27 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi release team,
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/
look useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing
instance instead of
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi release team,
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be
Hi Julien,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead
Le 31/03/2011 20:35, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
I’m surprised by the dependency level calculation – haskell-transformers
should be on one level with -deepseq. But maybe that calculation is
confused as the binary package names are changing during the transition.
The code assumes (among other
Hi release team,
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be
possible?
For the ghc transition, these settings should do, if I guess
6 matches
Mail list logo
