On 9 August 2016 at 17:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| On 07/08/16 15:18, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Thanks for starting the g++-6 transition.
| >
| > I suspect/believe that I "own" a (small) stack which needs a transition
policy:
| >
| > -- the "R" language (source package r-base)
On 9 August 2016 at 17:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| On 07/08/16 15:18, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Thanks for starting the g++-6 transition.
| >
| > I suspect/believe that I "own" a (small) stack which needs a transition
policy:
| >
| > -- the "R" language (source package r-base)
On 07/08/16 15:18, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Thanks for starting the g++-6 transition.
>
> I suspect/believe that I "own" a (small) stack which needs a transition
> policy:
>
> -- the "R" language (source package r-base) encodes its configuration time
> choices for all subsequent
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Let me know if I should take this to debian-devel or some other list.
I'm not part of the release team, but I expect you probably should
read the documentation and then file a bug report, the release team
often emphasises bug reports
Thanks for starting the g++-6 transition.
I suspect/believe that I "own" a (small) stack which needs a transition policy:
-- the "R" language (source package r-base) encodes its configuration time
choices for all subsequent compilations; here we have CXX and CXX1X (plus
CXX1Y in next
5 matches
Mail list logo