Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-07 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de [120406 13:47]: Bernhard R. Link dixit: The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a non-minimal chroot. Non-minimal is unclean. A unclean chroot is one with modifications that make it unsuiteable for building packages. A package

Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de [120406 13:47]: Bernhard R. Link dixit: The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a non-minimal chroot. Non-minimal is unclean. A unclean chroot is one with

Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Bernhard R. Link dixit: The effect you see is usually not from a unclean chroot, but from a non-minimal chroot. Non-minimal is unclean. It essentially means that the cvs package misses either code to mitigate this or misses a Build-Conflicts. Possibly… the package from squeeze and older is

Re: broken cvs in squeeze-security

2012-04-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 11:43 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Bernhard R. Link dixit: The following patch moves he deletion behind dh_compress, thus actually matching something. OK. Thanks! fwiw, I assume s/\.gz//g on the affected lines would also have worked. Should I upload this, or does