On 20/06/12 22:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
You still didn't address that in your reply.
Steven,
You seem to have three issues:
1.) feature based tests rather than platform based tests.
I totally get the desirability of this. It means new OS 's or
improvements to OS's get picked up
On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a
point.
To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more
explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away and keep the intended
functionality once the cause had been
On 21/06/12 11:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a
point.
To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more
explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away and keep
Nicholas Bamber, le Thu 21 Jun 2012 13:04:17 +0100, a écrit :
++/* As per #678358, Hurd defines AF_LINK but does not
++ * provide the functionality. When that bug is fixed
++ * These three lines could be removed and #678375 closed.
++ */
++#ifdef __GNU__
++#undef AF_LINK
++#endif
I'm
Jamie,
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay.
diff -Nru pmacct-0.14.0/debian/changelog
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Jamie,
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay.
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after that
I'll upload with a 2-day delay.
Thanks for
On 20/06/12 12:27, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/06/12 11:56, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have a proposed fix as attached. It's built, signed and ready to go.
If you have intentions to fix it yourself please reply and do so
promptly. I'll run my fix past a few people for feedback but after
Hi Nicholas,
On 20/06/12 12:53, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Sorry I didn't notice the FTBS on hurd as I was concentrating on the
red. I guess I should have trusted the bug report title more.
I only noticed on buildd.d.o that the failure was the same there.
However I am confused at what your are
Jamie,
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff. Unless I get any more feedback I'll probably
upload it tomorrow with a 2-day delay.
diff -Nru pmacct-0.14.0/debian/changelog pmacct-0.14.0/debian/changelog
---
On 20/06/12 15:59, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff.
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not (k)FreeBSD-specific, so a test for
FreeBSD ||
On 20/06/12 22:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/06/12 15:59, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am
attaching a new debdiff.
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not
On 20/06/12 22:09, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
On 20/06/12 22:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail:
sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not (k)FreeBSD-specific, so a test for
FreeBSD || FreeBSD_kernel would not be appropriate.
You still didn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
