On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:01:46AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
Considering the issues we had with (keeping) eclipse itself in testing,
I can understand why the release team would be reluctant to include CDT
in Squeeze at the current time and I admit sharing their reluctance a bit.
Though I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010-11-15 22:29, maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:38:08PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:33 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they prefer to c++ in eclipse.
any reason why this 36 old package missed the freeze so closely.
could it be unblocked with an ack from the maintainer?
thanks.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:33 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they prefer to c++ in eclipse.
any reason why this 36 old package missed the freeze so closely.
Not commenting on the merits of the package, but the freeze was
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:38:08PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:33 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
we have users at the institute asking for the cdt in eclipse
as they prefer to c++ in eclipse.
any reason why this 36 old package missed the freeze so closely.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:59 PM, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
don't be so picky.
It is clear that their are usecases for it and as it looks
testing migration doesn't hurt.
Although I'd like to hear a word from the maintainers, obviously. :)
At this point I think the best alternative
6 matches
Mail list logo
