Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vzctl
A fix for two bashisms have been solved. The problem is
described in the bug report with number #690713.
Thanks in advance,
unblock vzctl/3.0.30.2-4
Your message dated Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:19:30 +
with message-id 1352146770.30613.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#692405: unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #692405,
regarding unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vzctl
The reason for the update is better information on how to download the
openvz kernel package.
unblock vzctl/3.0.30.2-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release
Your message dated Sun, 26 Aug 2012 02:53:47 +0200
with message-id 20120826005347.gd19...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#685866: unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685866,
regarding unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2012 21:40:11 +0200
with message-id 20120803194011.ge17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683198: unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683198,
regarding unblock: vzctl/3.0.30.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vzctl
I have updated the documentation to fit wheezy release. Specifially
on the fact that wheezy do not provide any openvz kernel packages.
unblock vzctl/3.0.30.2
Your message dated Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:41:10 +0100
with message-id 4d47e346.90...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#611706: unblock: vzctl/3.0.24-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #611706,
regarding unblock: vzctl/3.0.24-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: release.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock vzctl/3.0.24-12. It includes a very important (serious?)
typo that prevent vzeventd from being start at boot.
inid - init.
vzctl (3.0.24-12) unstable; urgency=high
* Corrected the issue that vzeventd is not enabled
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:14:58 +0100
with message-id 4cf933a2.1070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#605758: Please unblock vzctl due to documentation fix
has caused the Debian Bug report #605758,
regarding Please unblock vzctl due to documentation fix
to be marked as done
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi
I would like you to unblock vzctl due to that I have changed
the README.Debian file. It is a document correction only.
vzctl (3.0.24-11) unstable; urgency=low
* Applied a documentation update for README.Debian as the name of the
sample
Hi
I have uploaded a fix for vzctl. It turned out that one of the
patches for an important bug #597876 was wrong. One character
was missing.
vzctl (3.0.24-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Correction of the solution for #597876. A typo cause the correction
to not work.
-- Ola Lundqvist o
On 11/07/2010 08:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have uploaded a fix for vzctl. It turned out that one of the
patches for an important bug #597876 was wrong. One character
was missing.
vzctl (3.0.24-10) unstable; urgency=medium
* Correction of the solution for #597876. A typo cause
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 21:35 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.
I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few
more things.
1) The init script return with error
Great! Thanks a lot!
// Ola
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 06:49:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 21:35 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.
I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
you noted. This correction
On 29/10/2010 07:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Release team
I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs and one
release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the changes below.
There is:
--- vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/etc
of important bugs and one
release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the changes below.
There is:
--- vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in
@@ -85 +85,26 @@
+vzdaemon_start()
+{
+ case DISTR in
I guess you meant case $DISTR
Mehdi,
Thanks for reporting that! It's my bug :( and I am also unsure
how this went unnoticed.
Fixed in vzctl git:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=3527cc269bb51d48e0f511fbf7a807ad56c223d5
On 10/29/2010 04:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Mehdi
Thanks. Will upload a new corrected
:03PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
Mehdi,
Thanks for reporting that! It's my bug :( and I am also unsure
how this went unnoticed.
Fixed in vzctl git:
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=3527cc269bb51d48e0f511fbf7a807ad56c223d5
On 10/29/2010 04:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Mehdi
Thanks
Hi Mehdi
I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.
I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few
more things.
1) The init script return with error 1 when already started or already stopped.
This makes
Hi Release team
I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs and one
release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the changes below.
Closes: 597522 597555 597876 600081 600455 600585
Changes:
vzctl (3.0.24-8) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:51:55 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Julien
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:47:26PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:10:51 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
...
Why are you ignoring errors from the init script?
Good question. It is a
Hi julien
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:37:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:51:55 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Julien
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:47:26PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:10:51 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
...
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 22:22:09 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
vzctl (3.0.24-5) unstable; urgency=medium
--- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
@@ -19,12 +19,22 @@
install)
;;
upgrade)
+# Upgrade path, vz cron file no longer needed
Hi Julien
Thanks for checking the package.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:24:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 22:22:09 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
vzctl (3.0.24-5) unstable; urgency=medium
--- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.preinst
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 22:10:51 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
diff -u vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
--- vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
+++ vzctl-3.0.24/debian/vzctl.postinst
@@ -52,6 +41,25 @@
rm $NAMECFG
and second hunks in
etc/dists/scripts/debian-add_ip.sh.
It is this solution:
'debian-add_ip.sh: fixlet for Ubuntu networking'
http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=0ea082ad2e72b6bad15c0e64d8bf2b4e1ee7f11a
Ubuntu is not Debian, I know. But this problem is to solve so that
you can run Ubuntu
Hi release team
I'd like you to unblock vzctl. I have backported a number of important
bugs from the upstream 3.0.24.2 source. Not all as not all affect Debian,
but the packports can be considered to be important.
The most important change in this new version is the solution to
#576227
Hi Debian Release team
I need some advice from you. I'm about to solve #576227 on vzctl.
This is a quite big problem with vzctl as vzctl do not work with
insserv. In the
beginning it looked like a small problem, but it has turned out to be
a serious problem for squeeze.
Upstream have
.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:11:19AM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-08-2010 13:25, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Release team
Hi Ola,
I have corrected a release critical bug (#594783) in vzctl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-08-2010 02:54, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Thanks a lot for your comment! I was not aware of that rule myself.
I have now changed both Required-Start and Required-Stop to a more
suiteable value. That is depend on $local_fs, $time, $syslog for start
Hi Release team
I have corrected a release critical bug (#594783) in vzctl and
would like you to allow this change into squeeze.
Thanks in advance,
// Ola
--
--- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology
/ o...@inguza.comAnnebergsslingan 37
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-08-2010 13:25, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi Release team
Hi Ola,
I have corrected a release critical bug (#594783) in vzctl and
would like you to allow this change into squeeze.
In your diff you added this:
+### BEGIN INIT INFO
+# Provides
[CC list trimmed]
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 12:30 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
A)
* Fix in stable
(This will probably not break any existing configurations, it will just
keep links that were removed before)
Pro: would help fast
Pro: no side effetcs
Con: does it break
severity 557785 important
thanks
Hi Robert and Debian Release team
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:17:28AM +0100, Robert Heinzmann wrote:
Olá Ola :)
:-)
Is this a data corruption issue ? I think not in the first place, but It can
become one.
Consider the typical HA scenario (* is the active
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like vzctl to be unblocked again. I have corrected
one important bug as we obviously had a regression related to IPv6. The
change is
very small.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
286: Googlehupf
Abstand
Hi
I would like vzctl to be unblocked again. I have corrected
one important bug as we obviously had a regression related to IPv6. The change
is
very small.
New version of vzctl is 3.0.22-14
For more information see #505792.
The fix is as follows:
--- scripts/debian-add_ip.sh2008-01-06 17
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I would like vzctl to be unblocked again. I have corrected
one more bashism. I'm sorry that I did not look though the bug
list enough before my last upload.
New version of vzctl is 3.0.22-13
It corrects a bashism as reported
Hi
I have corrected a few bashisms (see #501374) by simply stating
that /bin/bash should be used instead of /bin/sh in a few
scripts. It is the safest way to solve it so close to the release.
So please add vzctl to the list of release exceptions to go into
lenny.
The version uploaded is 3.0.22
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 04:49:57PM +, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have corrected a few bashisms (see #501374) by simply stating
that /bin/bash should be used instead of /bin/sh in a few
scripts. It is the safest way to solve it so close to the release.
unblocked.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to have the vzctl version unfrozen because I have
updated the documentation and corrected an init.d problem.
vzctl do not stop on stop with the new init system.
Unblocked.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
163: SMD
Hi
I would like to have the vzctl version unfrozen because I have
updated the documentation and corrected an init.d problem.
vzctl do not stop on stop with the new init system.
Best regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED
Version: 3.0.22-1
Hi
I have now uploaded one new version for stable that fixes this critical issue.
It turned out that this problem was fixed, but not for stable.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:24:37PM +0100, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Package: vzctl
Version: 3.0.11-13
Hi
I have got a report about this bug #469293, that is about data corruption
during a migration function that exist within vzctl.
The fix is simple, but I need to know if it is possible to get this fix
in the next version (r4) of etch.
It would really be good because this bug is a nasty one
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:59:51PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
I have got a report about this bug #469293, that is about data corruption
during a migration function that exist within vzctl.
The fix is simple, but I need to know if it is possible to get this fix
in the next version (r4
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 21:26:56 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
What is the distribution that I should use for this upload?
stable etch stable-proposed-updates or something else?
Either stable or proposed-updates.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
this bug #469293, that is about data corruption
during a migration function that exist within vzctl.
The fix is simple, but I need to know if it is possible to get this fix
in the next version (r4) of etch.
Seems to be suitable, please upload.
Thanks,
Neil
--
[..] Debian
Hi
I'll upload to stable then.
It will take a few days as I want to verify the correction
and run it though my normal stability tests.
Best regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:36:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 21:26:56 +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without the changes the vzmigrate tool do not work on Debian
systems.
The following changes have been made:
* Documentation link (not that important but safe)
* vzmigrate update, important in order for it to work
* Added dependency on vzquota as it in
Hi
I have made some quite important updates to the vzctl package.
Without the changes the vzmigrate tool do not work on Debian
systems.
The following changes have been made:
* Documentation link (not that important but safe)
* vzmigrate update, important in order for it to work
* Added
Hi
I would like you to accept the vzctl package in unstable
to etch. I have updated it with a missing recommendation
on rsync that one of the tools need. It is not a critical thing
but it would be nice and it do not create any extra problems.
Regards,
// Ola
--
- Ola
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
Hi Ola
I would like you to accept the vzctl package in unstable
to etch. I have updated it with a missing recommendation
on rsync that one of the tools need. It is not a critical thing
but it would be nice and it do not create any extra problems.
unblock hint added
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
The response from the following bug #390637 was that I need to
inform the release team and request the removal by them.
That response is incorrect. You're
intervention to remove them?
In any case vzctl should never have been built for some architectures
as there is no kernel syscal for those.
Regards,
// Ola
- Forwarded message from Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:32 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
[...]
One question.
If I change the architecture list (remove or add). Do you need to manually
do things in order for it to take effect (especially remove) or can I control
it myself this way?
Regards,
// Ola
Regards,
Adam
[G... let's see if we can send it with some content this time...]
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 21:32 +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
[...]
One question.
If I change the architecture list (remove or add). Do you need to manually
do things in order for it to take effect (especially remove) or can
Hi
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:19:07PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 15:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Monday, October 02, 2006 10:50 AM, Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm writing this to request the removal of some built packages
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 04:51:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
The response from the following bug #390637 was that I need to
inform the release team and request the removal by them.
That response is incorrect. You're requesting binary removal, not source
removal; binary removal is handled
57 matches
Mail list logo
