Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
Thanks for reviewing the patch, and spotting the leftover set -x in the
postinst which I missed switching off after my tests.
On 09/26/2012 02:59 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Normally the config script doesn't touch configuration files, it reads
the
On Mon, September 17, 2012 15:58, Philipp Kern wrote:
ok, given the replies, let's settle on this:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side
OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in.
The other two ia32-libs-* do not
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in.
The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release.
Attached is the proposed changelog entry. Let me know when I can upload.
ok, please
Dear Release Team,
any news on my unblock request (pre-approval) of slbackup 0.0.12-4?
Greets,
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, rothenstein 5, 24214 neudorf-bornstein
fon: +49 (1520) 1976 148
GnuPG Key ID 0x25771B31
mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
Your message dated Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:22:10 +0200
with message-id 20120926102210.GJ31592@mobee
and subject line not an issue anymore, upstream will port 1.4.6 to libevent 2.0
(see #687402)
has caused the Debian Bug report #688244,
regarding unblock: beanstalkd/1.7-1
to be marked as done.
This
On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in.
The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this release.
Attached is the proposed
Hi.
[ Cc: debian-release for advice ].
I have received this report which is really two different bugs:
A) The initial one reported by Igor: Building m4 creates a package
linked with libsigsegv or not depending on the environment. This
should never happen in a Debian package and that's why we
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please approve the following changes for package libxvmc
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see
#640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal
On 26.09.2012 11:53, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are
in.
The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this
Dear Release Team,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:43:32AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:36:47PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: libpri
Version: 1.4.12-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
The upstream Makefile creates a version.c
Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20120926_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tgqy6-0008nt...@franck.debian.org
In case anyone is interested in a .dsc:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxvmc/libxvmc_1.0.7-1.1.dsc
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see
#640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal changes to the
libxvmc package:
Related to this, there's also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373
Kind regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 26.09.2012 14:01, Ralf Jung wrote:
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy
(see
#640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal changes to the
libxvmc package:
Related to this, there's also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373
Not so
Hi,
FWIW I've prepared a few packages to unblock for d-i beta 3:
# only/mostly l10n:
unblock apt-setup/1:0.72
unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.72
unblock arcboot-installer/1.18
unblock-udeb arcboot-installer/1.18
unblock flash-kernel/3.3
unblock-udeb flash-kernel/3.3
unblock network-console/1.39
On 2012-09-26 15:20, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Not so much related, as a proposed alternative, afaics? The maintainers
appear to have made their opinion quite clear in #640499 on the
originally suggested approach, however...
Therefore I'm now investigating a different approach ...
Andreas
--
Hi,
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see
#640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal changes to the
libxvmc package:
Related to this, there's also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373
Not so much related, as a proposed
On 26.09.2012 14:32, Ralf Jung wrote:
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy
(see
#640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal changes to
the
libxvmc package:
Related to this, there's also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373
Not so
Hi,
Not so much related, as a proposed alternative, afaics? The
maintainers appear to have made their opinion quite clear in
#640499 on the originally suggested approach, however...
You mean http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640499#66
?
No, I meant
Hi,
since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
I haven't heard yet of plans to port d-i to gtk3, and that wouldn't
happen during the wheezy release
On Friday, August 31, 2012 09:38:25 PM Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Excluding the documentation and renaming the directory back results in
quite a sane diff. Please feel free to upload to unstable; let's see
how that goes.
[10:54:07] ScottK adsb: re your poke r.e. #681107 - It's made it to ten days
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nova, it's just a debconf translation update
(that will make Spanish a step closer to be complete on Wheezy).
unblock nova/2012.1.1-10
Thanks in advance, regards.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mathematica-fonts, it fixes an important issue
via unstable (#686260: allow for translation of all user-visible
messages), with a review of all descriptions, update
Processing changes file: ia32-libs_20120926_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tgtan-0006om...@franck.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package vavoom
package vavoom is a free engine for doom gamedata
it recomends freedom which is a free doom-like gamedata
freedom depends on boom-engine virtual package,
On 26.09.2012 16:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
I haven't heard yet of plans to port d-i to gtk3,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I've prepared a tpu security upload for openjpeg (attached).
Ok to upload?
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
This is the follow up improvement of the fix intended for RC bug
#684245. This patch avoids all situations that may be encountered to
trigger the bug in gnumeric, fix for that bug has been
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (26/09/2012):
FWIW I've prepared a few packages to unblock for d-i beta 3:
[…]
Here's another round. I uploaded some of them, merging somebody else's
work (hello Steve). grub2 could welcome another pair of eyes. All of
them are on my hints file.
## mostly l10n
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 13:47:21 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/26/2012 02:59 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Normally the config script doesn't touch configuration files, it reads
the current configuration if it exists, updates the values in debconf,
then asks the user if necessary. The
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 14:06:33 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Can we add a new package
Package: libxvmc1-i386
Section: libs
Priority: extra
Architecture: i386
Multi-arch: same
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 15:57:09 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote:
Essentially, this is the case here, too: Getting git of
libgl1-nvidia-glx-ia32, as it depended on ia32-libs (and, as reported by
Andreas [1], can't be built with the multiarchified ia32-libs). So
removing ia32-libs is the cause for this
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 19:11 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
# XXX: second look appreciated
# xz compression + 4 RC bug fixes
unblock grub2/1.99-23
unblock-udeb grub2/1.99-23
Looks sane enough to me.
# single bugfix for pf crash, no-op for d-i:
unblock kfreebsd-9/9.0-6
unblock-udeb
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:10 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
For the record; done.
Regards,
Adm
--
To
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 17:43:54 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package openjpeg
The unstable version enables multiarch and fixes a security issue.
Is there a
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:27:15 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Jon Severinsson wrote:
Release note that this bug blocks sound from working in wine and other i386
applications on amd64 in wheezy for many configurations (including mine).
That is because
On 2012-09-26 20:13, Julien Cristau wrote:
If libgl1-nvidia-glx-ia32 used to not need libxvmc, why can't
libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 also be made to not need libxvmc?
Good question ...
nvidia-graphics-drivers (256.53-1) experimental; urgency=low
[ Andreas Beckmann ]
* Add libxvmc1 to
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 20:46:08 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 17:43:54 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package openjpeg
The
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 14:06:33 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see
#640499)
To be clear, I'm not doing multiarch libxvmc myself, but if you or
somebody else want to do that in a NMU I won't stop you.
Cheers,
Julien
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 18:11:46 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I've prepared a tpu security upload for openjpeg (attached).
Ok to upload?
I followed up to the unblock bug
On 2012-09-26 21:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 14:06:33 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see
#640499)
To be clear, I'm not doing multiarch libxvmc myself, but if you or
somebody else want to do that in a
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (26/09/2012):
# xz compression + 4 RC bug fixes
unblock grub2/1.99-23
unblock-udeb grub2/1.99-23
Looks sane enough to me.
Great.
Thanks for checking, I've urgented all packages I've mentioned
accordingly.
Steve, if britney runs fine tonight, we
Processing changes file: tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze5_amd64.changes
REJECT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tgxl2-gn...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 unblock: autofs/5.0.7-1
Bug #684355 [release.debian.org] unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: autofs/5.0.7-1' from 'unblock: autofs/5.0.6-3'
--
684355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684355
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: retitle -1 unblock: autofs/5.0.7-1
Please unblock package autofs
There are a few relatively small changes fixing some bugs
and making the package more accurate. Also, per request
from the previous maintainer, debian/control is changed
to list new maintainer address - this is
On 26.09.2012 23:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
Debdiff between wheezy and sid version will be sent in a separate
email, since it is large. The same but without upstream changes
(which are easily visible in the git tree referenced above) and
the removal of half-5.0.7 upstream diff from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package rsyslog
The changelog reads:
* Disable omstdout module again. Upstream doesn't consider it viable for
production use but mainly for the internal testbench.
The patch debian/patches/03-fix_relp_dns_resolution.patch has been
reviewed by upstream and applied to the Git repository [1], fwiw.
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
http://git.adiscon.com/?p=rsyslog.git;a=commit;h=136f6e097800742ec232c968b2bdd03bfab687f4
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking
48 matches
Mail list logo
