[Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters. While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with the architecture qualifications. For starters, here are the architectures we are aware of: * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x -

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Hi Niels! On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch. > > I kindly ask you to: > > * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch. To give some insight what's happening in Debian Ports. We have two

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

thanks to everyone explaining arch:any to me :) -- cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Uploading linux (4.6.1-1)

I intend to upload linux version 4.6.1-1 on Monday.  This is a new upstream version, which of course means an ABI change. Aside from that, the highlights are: - Added userland packages for mipsn32, mipsn32el and tilegx - Rewrote maintainer scripts, removing little-used features and fixing   some

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'm not sure whether you are talking about source or binary packages but > sid/amd64 has over 24000 source packages and over 5 binary packages, > so I would call the above "on par". Or what am I missing? There are just around 12,000 source

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> ppc64: >> >> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We >> have over >> 11.000 packages installed > [...] >> sparc64: >> We are close to

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote: all arm ports have DSA concerns. Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the topic said it was "being worked on", sledge whats the status here?) are there

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

peter green: > On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote: >> all arm ports have DSA concerns. >> > Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still > a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the topic > said it was "being worked on", sledge whats the

Bug#826429: jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear all, A security issue was found in quassel-core (CVE-2016-4414), allowing an unauthenticated remote client to cause a denial of service. Given the fact that Quassel isn't

Bug#826429: jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 15:56 +0200, Pierre Schweitzer wrote: > A security issue was found in quassel-core (CVE-2016-4414), allowing an > unauthenticated remote client to cause a denial of service. > Given the fact that Quassel isn't widely used in the client/server

Processed: Re: Bug#826429: jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #826429 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 826429: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826429 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Steven Chamberlain: > Hi, > Hi, > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state >> in Debian. >> We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox, >> Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name

Re: mips64el in testing

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >> On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> [...] >> >> Please let us know when those issues get sorted out. >> >> Cheers, >> Emilio >> > > Hi, > > Just a friendly reminder that we have not heard

Processed: jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 zabbix Bug #826443 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1 Added indication that 826443 affects zabbix -- 826443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826443 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#826443: jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Control: affects -1 zabbix Dear release team, I'd like to upload fix for CVE-2016-4338 / ZBX-10741: mysql.size shell command injection in zabbix-agent (Closes: #823329). Diff

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > ppc64: > > This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have > over > 11.000 packages installed [...] > sparc64: > We are close to 11.000 installed packages. I'm not sure whether you are

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > Hi Niels! > > On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch. >> >> I kindly ask you to: >> >> * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch. > > To give some insight what's

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Hi, On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 13:26 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > sh4: > > > The two biggest issues with sh4 are currently with binutils and the > kernel. binutils has problems when building Qt5: > There is in fact another big elephant in the room, which I have mentioned several

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 05/06/16 13:00, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: ppc64: This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have over 11.000 packages installed [...] sparc64: We are close to 11.000

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state in > Debian. > We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox, > Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name the most important ones. Is there

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 2016-06-05 10:01, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters. > > While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with > the architecture qualifications. > > For starters, here are the architectures we are aware of: [ snip ] > * mips64el (NEW)

Re: mips64el in testing

YunQiang Su: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> [...] >> AFAICT, we are still missing: >> >> * A rebuild of the last package [mipsel64import] > > This is a bug of gcc, and the gcc team in IMG is working on it. > It also effects lua. > Thanks for the

Re: mips64el in testing

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 06/03/16 01:21, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> [...] > > Please let us know when those issues get sorted out. > > Cheers, > Emilio > Hi, Just a friendly reminder that we have not heard from you on this topic. AFAICT, we are still missing: * A rebuild of the last

Re: arch:all package with missing i386 dependencies

On 03/06/16 14:28, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > [Please Cc me; I'm not subscribed] > > Dear release team, > > similarly to the circlator case described in [1], I am currently facing > a new package (ariba [2]) that currently wouldn't transition to testing > because of missing i386 dependencies: >

Re: mips64el in testing

* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) [160605 22:45]: > In other words, there is a DSA buildd? > > I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds: > > * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01, >mipsel-manda-02 >- I presume none of them are DSA

Bug#826443: jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 01:45 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I'd like to upload fix for > > CVE-2016-4338 / ZBX-10741: mysql.size shell command injection > in zabbix-agent (Closes: #823329). Please go ahead. Regards, Adam

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.63-1~deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.63-1~deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_51.0.2704.79-1~deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Processed: Re: Bug#826443: jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #826443 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package zabbix/1:2.2.7+dfsg-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 826443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826443 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#824658: jessie-pu: package jakarta-jmeter/2.11-2+deb8u1

Le 5/06/2016 à 19:20, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > This was uploaded after the window for the 8.5 point release closed and > has now been flagged for acceptance. That's perfect, thank you. Emmanuel Bourg

Bug#824658: jessie-pu: package jakarta-jmeter/2.11-2+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 18:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:55 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I'd like to fix the bug #795356 reported against JMeter. We basically forgot > > to install 11 XML files and a DTD

Processed: Re: Bug#824658: jessie-pu: package jakarta-jmeter/2.11-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #824658 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package jakarta-jmeter/2.11-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 824658: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824658 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 2016-06-05 13:38 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > peter green: > > On 05/06/16 11:01, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> all arm ports have DSA concerns. > >> > > Is there a current reference to what these concerns are? Is there still > > a lack of out of band management? (the old mail I found on the

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 2016-06-05 14:46 +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > [0]: I'd define core packages as everything needed to install, boot, and > > then build packages on that arch. The rebootstrap project gives us some > > idea of what those are; but add to that the kernel and any bootloaders. > > Being able to

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 05/06/16 23:01, Wookey wrote: Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures? Thats what it looks like to me. And I think we are building armhf on the arm64 build machines too? I don't think so. At least I see no evidence of it on buildd.debian.org .

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 2016-06-05 23:10 +0100, peter green wrote: > On 05/06/16 23:01, Wookey wrote: > >>Ok, so a total of 6 shared between the two architectures? > Thats what it looks like to me. > >And I think we are building armhf on the arm64 build machines too? > I don't think so. At least I see no evidence of

Bug#824887: marked as done (transition: gl2ps)

Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2016 00:19:29 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#824887: transition: gl2ps has caused the Debian Bug report #824887, regarding transition: gl2ps to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the