Bug#829650: jessie-pu: package ruby-eventmachine/1.0.3-6+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear Release Team, The Security Team suggested fixing the TEMP-0678512-2E167C [1] security issue through a point release. The issue is a remotely triggerable crash due to stack

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On 4 July 2016 at 09:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): >> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some >> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, >> similarly to what we did in

Bug#828177: jessie-pu: package unbound/1.4.22-3+deb8u2

Robert Edmonds wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > May I take the opportunity to ask you to also fix the 'stop' action from > > the init script? > > > > We've been using this patch on the debian.org hosts for a year now. > > Previously restarting the service would quite often result in no running

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:01 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: [...] > > >  * rebuilt d-i to match that kernel > > > > You know there are patches around for that. > > > > >  * X drivers > > > > I don't see backports for them. > > libdrm2: 2.4.68-1~bpo8+1 > libgl1-mesa-.*: 11.1.3-1~bpo8+1 >

Bug#829606: jessie-pu: package duck/0.7+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Paul Wise found out that duck rund untrusted code from the current directory as well as the ./lib and ./lib/checks directory. The attached patch fixes this issue. -- System

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey folks, > > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. As I recall, that added extra packages

Bug#829603: jessie-pu: package conkeror/1.0~~pre-1+git141025-1+deb8u2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu With the update to Firefox 45 in Jessie, it once again caused regressions in depending packages due to removed features. For conkeror it's this time the removal of some specific

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

(Please keep me cc'd.) Philipp Kern (2016-07-04): > On 2016-07-04 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): > >>There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > >>other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a

Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 02/07/16 17:00, Maximiliano Curia wrote: > ¡Hola! > > Sorry for the delay we have been working in adding some dropped upstream > components. > > The list of source packages that we need to keep in unstable till the > transition > is finished are: > > akonadi >

Bug#829475: marked as done (nmu: slurm-llnl_16.05.0-1)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:06:59 +0200 with message-id <260ce00b-cce7-6728-1bb0-4dbcfe6d2...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#829475: nmu: slurm-llnl_16.05.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #829475, regarding nmu: slurm-llnl_16.05.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#829483: marked as done (nmu: scribus-ng_1.5.2+dfsg-2)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:07:52 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#829483: nmu: scribus-ng_1.5.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #829483, regarding nmu: scribus-ng_1.5.2+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#829486: marked as done (nmu: mod-wsgi_4.4.13-0.1)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 16:08:52 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#829486: nmu: mod-wsgi_4.4.13-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #829486, regarding nmu: mod-wsgi_4.4.13-0.1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

On 04/07/16 07:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-06-16 10:25, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> On 2016-06-16 02:12, Hector Oron wrote: * mips64el (NEW) - No DSA buildd (RT blocker) >>> >>> As far as I can see mips64el is using shared builds with mipsel port >>> hardware, those machines are

Processed: Re: Bug#827755: transition: kdepim-16.04

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #827755 [release.debian.org] transition: kdepim-16.04 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 827755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey folks, > > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just

Bug#829371: transition: ntl

On 2016-07-03 10:30, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Control: tag -1 confirmed On 2016-07-02 21:58, Julien Puydt wrote: I checked that these new ntl packages make it possible to build eclib, flint, linbox, singular and flint-arb on an amd64 debian box, so I don't expect any new problem. Please go

Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

Hey folks, There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just like a normal jessie release, but with a few key updates: * backports kernel *

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

Hi, Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just > like a normal jessie release, but

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On 2016-07-04 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: tomcat8_8.0.14-1+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT

Bug#827061: marked as done (transition: openssl)

Control: reopen -1 On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 22:46 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > ginkgocadx (3.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* New upstream release, Closes: #827061 Nope. That's the tracking bug for the whole transition, not whatever bug might be specific to

Processed: Re: Bug#827061: marked as done (transition: openssl)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #827061 {Done: Gert Wollny } [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_allonly.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: xerces-c_3.1.1-5.1+deb8u3_armel.changes ACCEPT