On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 09:58:27 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/08/16 02:02, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > Dear Debian Release Team,
> >
> > twinkle has been marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-27 due
> > to this FTBFS. Building ucommon with GCC 6 instead of GCC 5 yields
> >
On 03/08/16 02:02, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Dear Debian Release Team,
>
> twinkle has been marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-27 due
> to this FTBFS. Building ucommon with GCC 6 instead of GCC 5 yields
> slight differences in the list of visible symbols.
>
> How should this bug be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
piuparts ftbfs in jessie, which I would like to fix with the following
upload:
$ git diff 0.62..jessie
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 45e9372..76cbd8f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
pkg-boost team would like to transition to the next boost abi, based on
1.61 release.
boost1.61 is now in experimental.
The abi is complex and depends on multiple things. We do not wish to
maintain same boost series (1.61) with multiple abi
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.61.html
Hi Dimitri,
On 03/08/16 18:02, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> pkg-boost team would like to transition to the next boost abi, based on
> 1.61 release.
>
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.61.html
Bug #833377 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: boost1.61 transition
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.61.html'.
--
833377:
On 03/08/16 19:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I'd like to make the GCC 6 defaults change later this week(end), including icu
> 57 and boost 1.61 transitions.
>
> While the bug number of the GCC 6 related issues is still high, I'm proposing
> to
> fix these on the fly (as suggested/discussed with
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 09:55:23PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 22:17 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > +python2.7 (2.7.9-2+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
> > +
> > + * Backport upstream commit b3ce713fb9beebfff9848cefa0acbd59acc68fe9
I'd like to make the GCC 6 defaults change later this week(end), including icu
57 and boost 1.61 transitions.
While the bug number of the GCC 6 related issues is still high, I'm proposing to
fix these on the fly (as suggested/discussed with Nils), because many of the
symbols related build
Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
>> This looks fine in general, I'm just wondering if the effect of bumping
>> the util-linux dependency on upgrades from wheezy was considered/tested?
>
> It was not specifically tested since I didn't
On 2016-06-24 10:35:43 [+0200], Yann Soubeyrand wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 23:13 +0200, jcris...@debian.org a écrit :
> > That doesn't sound suitable for a stable update, sorry.
> OK, I understand.
Closing with no change then.
Sebastian
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 22:32:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 29.07.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Am 29.07.2016 um 14:00 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> >> This looks fine in general, I'm just wondering if the effect of bumping
> >> the util-linux dependency on upgrades from wheezy was
12 matches
Mail list logo
