Bug#836917: transition: openmpi

I've done a round of rebuilds to assess the impact of this transition. The results are summarized below. Several package suffer from uninstallable build dependencies by having libopenmpi1.10 pulled in by dependencies that failed to rebuild. fftw (2.1.5-4) FTBFS due to . being removed from @INC in

Re: Bug#836940: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#836940: cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation

On 08/09/16 at 11:31 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Johannes Schauer wrote: > > > as we are talking about testing packages in the most minimal environment > > possible it must be noted that debootstrap --variant=minbase or > > --variant=buildd does not only install

Bug#836942: transition: glew

Hi Emilio! On 2016-09-07 at 23:22 (CEST), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: [...] > Go ahead. Uploaded. Thanks. -- Matteo F. Vescovi || Debian Developer GnuPG KeyID: 4096R/0x8062398983B2CF7A signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processed: Blocking bugs

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 836917 by 831164 811651 812036 825934 835680 811907 817690 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was not blocked by any bugs. 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 811651, 825934, 812036,

Processed: p4est: FTBFS due to test failures

Processing control commands: > block 836917 by -1 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 837055 811907 817690 812036 811651 825934 835680 831164 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 837058 -- 836917:

Processed: abyss: FTBFS (error: cannot convert 'std::ifstream {aka std::basic_ifstream}' to 'bool' in return)

Processing control commands: > block 836917 by -1 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 837012 811907 831164 817690 835680 825934 812036 837055 811651 837058 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 837059 -- 836917:

Processed: fftw: FTBFS due to bfnnconv.pl failing to execute m-ascii.pl (. removed from @INC in perl)

Processing control commands: > block 836917 by -1 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 831164 817690 835680 811907 825934 812036 811651 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 837055 -- 836917:

Bug#836917: transition: openmpi

On 08/09/2016 12:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > I've done a round of rebuilds to assess the impact of this transition. > The results are summarized below. Several package suffer from > uninstallable build dependencies by having libopenmpi1.10 pulled in by > dependencies that failed to

Bug#836917: transition: openmpi

Dear Bas, I sincerely apologise for the upload 2.0.1-3. It was meant to be an upload to 'experimental', not to 'sid', to avoid the transition. Kind regards Alastair On 07/09/2016 09:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User:

Processed: block 836917 with 837012

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 836917 with 837012 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 835680 837058 831164 825934 811651 811907 812036 817690 837055 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 837012 >

Processed: scalapack: FTBFS due to test failures

Processing control commands: > block 836917 by -1 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 837055 825934 837061 817690 835680 811651 831164 837012 837059 811907 837058 812036 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 837062 -- 836917:

Processed: gromacs: FTBFS due to test failures

Processing control commands: > block 836917 by -1 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 831164 837012 812036 835680 837055 811651 811907 817690 837058 825934 837059 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 836917: 837061 -- 836917:

Processed: block 836917 with 837030, affects 837030

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 836917 with 837030 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 817690 825934 835680 811651 837055 837059 811907 837058 837061 831164 837062 837012 812036 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:27:49PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > > similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just > > like a normal

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:27:49PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some >> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, >> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just >> like a normal

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: open-iscsi_2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: open-iscsi_2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: open-iscsi_2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Bug#837105: jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I would like to fix minor security issue in Werkzeug __debugger__. Patch:

Processed: block 836917 with 830440

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 836917 with 830440 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 837061 837012 811651 837055 837062 825934 831164 812036 817690 811907 837058 835680 837059 837030 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added

Processed: Re: Bug#837105: jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo Bug #837105 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. Bug #837105 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 837105:

Bug#837105: jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 21:28 +0200, Ondřej Nový wrote: > I would like to fix minor security issue in Werkzeug __debugger__. > > Patch: >

Processed: Re: Bug#837105: jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #837105 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 837105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#837105: jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1

Hi, 2016-09-08 21:39 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt : > Please provide a full source debdiff for the proposed package (built and > tested on jessie). > debdiff attached (which is same as linked patched) and (of course) already tested. Thanks. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový

Processed: Re: Bug#836866: jessie-pu: package tor/0.2.5.12-2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #836866 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package tor/0.2.5.12-2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 836866: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836866 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#825512: jessie-pu: package policykit-1/0.105-15~deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #825512 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package policykit-1/0.105-15~deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 825512: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825512 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: charybdis_3.4.2-5+deb8u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: charybdis_3.4.2-5+deb8u2_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: charybdis_3.4.2-5+deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT

Processed: hypre: -dev package library dependency not binNMU safe

Processing control commands: > block 836917 by -1 Bug #836917 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi 836917 was blocked by: 831164 811651 837030 812036 830440 837061 835680 837059 837062 811907 837055 837058 825934 837012 817690 836917 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of

Bug#837105: jessie-pu: package python-werkzeug/0.9.6+dfsg-1

Control: tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 22:21 +0200, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > > 2016-09-08 21:39 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt : > Please provide a full source debdiff for the proposed package > (built and > tested on

Bug#836700: jessie-pu: package cacti/0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u6

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 20:24 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 06-09-16 19:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks; please go ahead. > > Uploaded. Flagged for acceptance into p-u. Regards, Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#836700: jessie-pu: package cacti/0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u6

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #836700 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cacti/0.8.8b+dfsg-8+deb8u6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 836700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836700 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#835537: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #835537 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 835537: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835537 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#836866: jessie-pu: package tor/0.2.5.12-2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:09 +, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2016, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 18:04 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > +tor (0.2.5.12-2) stable; urgency=medium > > > + > > > +

Bug#825512: jessie-pu: package policykit-1/0.105-15~deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 18:01 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 05.09.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 18:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> sd_uid_get_state() is apparently broken in jessie with systemd-logind > >> under

Bug#835537: jessie-pu: package open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2016-09-06 at 20:30 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 09/06/2016 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 20:12 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > > [...] > > +open-iscsi (2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2)

Bug#836592: jessie-pu: package gdcm/2.4.4-3

On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 22:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + pending > > On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 18:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2016-09-04 at 13:14 +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > > The version of gdcm in jessie suffers from two

NEW changes in stable-new

Processing changes file: open-iscsi_2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: open-iscsi_2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-8+deb8u2_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: policykit-1_0.105-15~deb8u2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Processed: Re: Bug#836910: jessie-pu: package kamailio/4.2.0-2+deb8u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed Bug #836910 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package kamailio/4.2.0-2+deb8u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Bug #836910 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package kamailio/4.2.0-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 836910:

Bug#836910: jessie-pu: package kamailio/4.2.0-2+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:48 +0200, Victor Seva wrote: > 2016-09-07 9:30 GMT+02:00 Adam D. Barratt : > > Thanks for caring about fixing this in jessie. > > > > In order to okay an upload, however, we'd need to see a source debdiff for