Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2017 06:13:00 +
with message-id <4df58b68-ded3-c46d-6f36-818a97322...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#861704: unblock:
golang-github-jacobsa-fuse/0.0~git20150806.0.9a7512a-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #861704,
regarding unblock:
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2017 06:16:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#861688: unblock: newpid/8
has caused the Debian Bug report #861688,
regarding unblock: newpid/8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2017 06:02:00 +
with message-id <46d27f11-9b56-a2a9-fcc1-008d7e5a3...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#861701: unblock: dput-ng/1.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #861701,
regarding unblock: dput-ng/1.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 2017-05-02 20:24:19 [+0100], Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
> Yes, please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag when it is ready to
> unblock.
uploaded and built on all releases architectures.
Sebastian
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #861686 [release.debian.org] unblock: openssl/1.1.0e-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
861686: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861686
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:09:11 PM UTC Julien Cristau wrote:
> > So I think we should remove both packages from stretch and avoid painting
> > ourselves into a corner. Thoughts?
Can you elaborate a bit more on the "paint ourself in a corner"?
From my side, I can contribute these datapoints:
Control: severity 860747 serious
Control: tag 860747 stretch-ignore jessie-ignore
On 05/03/2017 04:27 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:12:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 13:42:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>>
>>> Package: gem2deb
>>> Version:
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:12:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 13:42:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
>
> > Package: gem2deb
> > Version: 0.33.1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Please have compiled Ruby extensions depend on compatible versions of
> > the ruby metapackage;
On 05/03/2017 12:49 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 12:24 +0200, Moritz Schlarb wrote:
>
>> - This has been the behavior of the Nagstamon package since forever
>> (which is not a valid argumentation point - I know, but it's still a fact)
>
> There are two serious bugs here:
>
> 1)
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
One of the UIs for OfflineIMAP, namely Blinkenlights, is broken in the
current version of OfflineIMAP. More specifically, the output of
Blinkenlights becomes "garbled"
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: nagstamon/2.0.1-5
Bug #861725 [release.debian.org] unblock: nagstamon/2.0.1-4
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: nagstamon/2.0.1-5' from 'unblock:
nagstamon/2.0.1-4'.
--
861725: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861725
Debian Bug
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nagstamon/2.0.1-5
Hi everyone,
I changed the patch to kind of the reverse: It now explicitly does not
call disable_warnings.
Regards,
Moritz
Attached nagstamon_2.0.1-5.debdiff
unblock nagstamon/2.0.1-5
On 03.05.2017 10:13, Moritz Schlarb wrote:
> Package:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package telepathy-qt
The package has a FTBFS RC bug on some architectures
(https://bugs.debian.org/859462) which is fixed with this upload.
unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nagstamon
Hi there,
nagstamon/2.0.1-4, which just got uploaded to unstable fixes #861152, which is
release critical and #774002, which just adds a Recommends for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock-udeb package win32-loader 0.8.3 as it fixes an FTBFS
on i386 in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package poco
I only added missing dependencies to fix the RC bug #861682.
Thanks!
debdiff attached.
unblock poco/1.7.6+dfsg1-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
Please unblock package golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest.
The version in unstable (0.0~git20150610-6.1) fixes an FTBFS on i386
(and possibly other architectures), see
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 12:24 +0200, Moritz Schlarb wrote:
> - This has been the behavior of the Nagstamon package since forever
> (which is not a valid argumentation point - I know, but it's still a fact)
There are two serious bugs here:
1) that certificates are not verified at least using CAs
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u4+b3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u4+b3_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20150422+deb8u4+b3_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On 05/03/2017 10:13 AM, Moritz Schlarb wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package nagstamon
>
> Hi there,
>
> nagstamon/2.0.1-4, which just got uploaded to unstable fixes #861152, which is
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2017-05-03):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
:)
>
Hi Julien, hi Paul,
On 03.05.2017 11:51, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't see how not checking certificates is in any way a reasonable
> thing to do. Silencing warnings about it makes it even worse.
Absolutely true - but:
- This has been the behavior of the Nagstamon package since forever
This time with -release's address spelled properly.
On 05/03/2017 12:04 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> rustc and cargo in stretch have no reverse deps so far, are likely to be
> needed at a newer version when firefox-esr updates to 59, and I'm
> worried the current version is not going to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock openjdk-8/8u131-b11-1, the quarterly security update by upstream.
And the full debdiff, which I forgot to attach. Sorry!
diff -Nru golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest-0.0~git20150610/debian/changelog golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest-0.0~git20150610/debian/changelog
--- golang-github-jacobsa-ogletest-0.0~git20150610/debian/changelog 2017-01-11 19:42:43.0 +0200
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libosmium
Upstream has only fixed bugs for this release in line with the freeze
policy.
(include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
unblock
27 matches
Mail list logo