Hi,
On Tue, 09 Jan 2018, Brian May wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> > I think this mail went through the cracks as we haven't received a reply
> > from you so far. Can you let us know the status and whether we can help to
> > get the wheezy update out ?
>
> Hello
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:33:59PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> nmu libvirt_3.10.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against qemu
> 1:2.11+dfsg-1"
>
> qemu 1:2.11+dfsg-1 added mips64 and mips64el to the supported
> architectures, thus the need for the rebuild. after libvirt has been
> rebuild I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu logol_1.7.7-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against swi-prolog-nox 7.6.3."
logol-bin has strictly versioned dependencies on
swi-prolog-nox (>= 7.6.2+dfsg~), swi-prolog-nox (<<
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I've prepared an update for dh-make-perl in jessie which fixes #851848.
The problem is that the Contents files have changed between
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:49:00 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#886959: nmu: libvirt_3.10.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #886959,
regarding nmu: libvirt_3.10.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:49:31 +0100
with message-id <65c20373-30d4-7a9c-93ff-25cf6bc1a...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#886997: nmu: logol_1.7.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #886997,
regarding nmu: logol_1.7.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:56:14 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#883933: nmu: polymake_3.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #883933,
regarding nmu: polymake_3.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Fri, January 12, 2018 10:24, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2018, Brian May wrote:
>> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>>
>> > I think this mail went through the cracks as we haven't received a
>> reply
>> > from you so far. Can you let us know the status and
8 matches
Mail list logo