On 2018-02-10 11:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> [...]
> Thanks, go ahead.
This is contradictory. Did you meant to tag the bug "confirmed" rather
than "moreinfo"?
>> +--- a/ncurses/tinfo/write_entry.c
>> b/ncurses/tinfo/write_entry.c
>> +@@ -267,6 +267,9 @@ _nc
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #885582 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
ncurses/6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #885582 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
ncurses/6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
885582:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
libopenraw is now uploaded to unstable. The only package needing a binNMU is
tumbler.
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:08:37 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
Got that one wrong, sorry.
Cheers,
Julien
On 2018-02-11 09:45 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:08:37 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>
> Got that one wrong, sorry.
Thanks, uploaded.
Cheers,
Sven
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
The attached debdiff adresses CVE-2018-6758 / 889753 for uwsgi in
stretch. Cf.
http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/2018-February/008835.html . The
issue does not warrant a DSA
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi
The attached debdiff adresses CVE-2018-6758 / 889753 for uwsgi in
jessie. Cf.
http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/2018-February/008835.html . The
issue does not warrant a DSA.
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_2.09-1+2018b_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tzdata_2018c-0+deb9u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_1.75-2+2018b_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: tzdata_2018c-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 1:14 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 02/10/2018 09:26 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 20:45:44 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >
> >> On 30/01/18 08:54, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> >>> This would also be very helpful for fixing security issue #888
Julien Cristau (2018-02-10):
> we shipped 9.3 a couple of months ago, so we're overdue for 9.4.
>
> Can you please let us know your availability on the following:
> - March 3
> - March 10
> - March 17
> - March 24
> - March 31
All dates equally OKish for me.
AFAICT:
- There's a busybox I need
Processing changes file: tzdata_2018c-0+deb9u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
This is a follow-up to the 1:5.2.7-1+deb9u2 security update.
- As was correctly pointed out on IRC the debdiff contains cruft from the
1:5.2.7-1 backport to jessie:
--- snip ---
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 09:47 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 20:14:14 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the review, I have reworked the debdiff - rather than
> > taking the last 16.11.x version we uploaded in Sid and reverting a
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team folks,
I have just uploaded a new version of ppp to experimental. That upload
requires packages that build pppd plugins to be rebuilt due to a change
in the pppd ABI. I w
On 11/02/18 21:04, Chris Boot wrote:
> Note that connman seems to be a package to newly depend on ppp-dev and
> builds a pppd plugin but it doesn't use my dh_ppp helper. I will be
> filing a bug against that package (including a patch) shortly. Even
> without said patch a binNMU is sufficient (and
16 matches
Mail list logo
