removal of src:lilo from bullseye

2019-12-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Package: release-notes Tags: bullseye Hi Joachim, On 30-11-2019 11:26, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: > But then the only solution is making a transitional package "lilo" which > have dependency to grub2, which will install grub2 and remove the binaries > of lilo. This can entail many risks. Because of

Re: Request: removal of package lilo from testing

2019-12-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Joachim Wiedorn schrieb: >> Your approach above will be good for users of unstable and testing, but >> how does this help users of stable, when they upgrade from buster to >> bullseye after the release of the latter? Just by writing this in the >> release notes? Is that the best we can do? > >

Bug#945957: release.debian.org: Package pymecavideo falsely trageted for AUTORM

2019-12-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 07:34:53PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > pymecavideo 6.5.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-12-28 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 942999: doxypy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye > > > > I double-checked this package, it

Bug#945957: release.debian.org: Package pymecavideo falsely trageted for AUTORM

2019-12-01 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hello release masters, I received an e-mail three days ago, Message-Id: , stating that: pymecavideo 6.5.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-12-28 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 942999: doxypy: Python2 removal in

Bug#945965: buster-pu: package bgpdump/1.6.0-1

2019-12-01 Thread Christoph Biedl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello release team, the bgpdump package has an embarrasing bug, starting the program results in an immediate segmentation fault, that's #945881 Luckily, a fix was fairly simple.

Bug#945957: release.debian.org: Package pymecavideo falsely trageted for AUTORM

2019-12-01 Thread Paul Gevers
severity 942999 important thanks Dear Georges, Thanks for reaching out. On 01-12-2019 19:34, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > I received an e-mail three days ago, Message-Id: p...@respighi.debian.org>, stating that: > > pymecavideo 6.5.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-12-28 > >

Bug#919218: non-transition: libqt5gui5-gles

2019-12-01 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Graham! On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 09:27:58AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Dmitry > > I started with a binNMU of 2048-qt [1] on its own. > > It didn't have the effect on the tracker that I was expecting [2]. > Would you please check the binaries and let me know if I should > continue with the

Bug#944480: marked as done (transition: libdvdread)

2019-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2019 10:56:23 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#944480: transition: libdvdread has caused the Debian Bug report #944480, regarding transition: libdvdread to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#945929: nmu: php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1

2019-12-01 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in sid." I don't know what happened to 7.3.11-1 ... but currently we have a version skew php7.3 | 7.3.10-1 | testing

Bug#945619: transition: kdepim 19.08

2019-12-01 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey Paul, As now the first archs have built everything the reverse dependencies can be triggered: nmu kio-gdrive_1.2.7-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild for KDEPIM 19.08." --extra-depends "libkpimgapi-dev (>> 19.08.3-1~)" nmu kjots_4:5.0.2-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild for KDEPIM 19.08."

Bug#945929: nmu: php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1

2019-12-01 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Andreas, Thanks for your work tracking broken/uninstallable packages. On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 11:32:11AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > nmu php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in sid." > > I don't know what happened to 7.3.11-1 ... but currently we have a > version skew

Bug#945619: transition: kdepim 19.08

2019-12-01 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey Paul, We need another binNMU as kitinerary it was built too early on mips64el: nmu kitinerary_19.08.3-1 . mips64el . unstable . -m "rebuild for KDEPIM 19.08." --extra-depends "libkpimpkpass-dev (>> 19.08.3-1~)" hefee signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#945944: stretch-pu: package ros-ros-comm/1.12.6-2

2019-12-01 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi release team, The ros-ros-comm version in stretch is affected affected by CVE-2019-13566 which was flagged no-dsa by the security team. I propose the attached patch to fix the

Bug#919218: non-transition: libqt5gui5-gles

2019-12-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! El dom., 1 dic. 2019 05:39, Dmitry Shachnev escribió: > Hi Graham! > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2019 at 09:27:58AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > > Hi Dmitry > > > > I started with a binNMU of 2048-qt [1] on its own. > > > > It didn't have the effect on the tracker that I was expecting [2]. > > Would

Bug#945929: marked as done (nmu: php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1)

2019-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 1 Dec 2019 17:59:24 +0100 with message-id <20191201165922.ga13...@debian.org> and subject line Re: nmu: php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #945929, regarding nmu: php7.3_7.3.11-1~deb10u1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#945975: nmu libgnatcoll_18-4 libgnatcoll-bindings_18-2.1 libgnatcoll-db_18-4 asis_2018-2 libaws_19.0-2

2019-12-01 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
With the attachment. gpr-graph.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document

Bug#945975: nmu libgnatcoll_18-4 libgnatcoll-bindings_18-2.1 libgnatcoll-db_18-4 asis_2018-2 libaws_19.0-2

2019-12-01 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello. As reported in #945197, the grpc and gprbuild source packages both build libgpr.so. In order to fix the conflict, version 2018-7 of the libgpr2-dev binary package renames libgpr.so