Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
Fixing the no-dsa tagged CVE-2021-42260
[ Impact ]
DoS vulnerability
[ Tests ]
General testing of a few reverse-dependencies.
[ Risks ]
Targeted fix that has been
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> clone 1022009 -2
Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0
Bug 1022009 cloned as bug 1023093
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1022010 [dleyna-renderer] dleyna-renderer: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> clone 1022009 -2
Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0
Bug 1022009 cloned as bug
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1022011 [dleyna-server] dleyna-server: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> clone 1022009 -2
Bug #1022009 [src:dleyna-core] dleyna-core: transition to gssdp/gupnp 1.6.0
Bug 1022009 cloned as bug 1023095
TL;DR I consider myself ready to start the transition now, with removals
in the plan.
* gupnp/experimental has now successfully built on s390x
- this verifies gssdp 1.6.0-2 (with patch from upstream) fixes an old
bug caught by the (new) gupnp test
* Note: ppc64el has still not built
Processing changes file: libdatetime-timezone-perl_2.47-1+2022f_source.changes
ACCEPT
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
Bug #1022926 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc 2.36
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html'.
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1022926
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: bdr...@debian.org
As usual, a distro-info-data update.
[ Reason ]
There's a new Ubuntu development release, and also some minor Debian
changes.
* Update data to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #1022248 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1022248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:39 PM Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> On 2022-10-22 19:17:58 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Transition is similar to the previous ones, this time boost1.74 needs
> > to be binNMUed after level1 before other level2 packages and pyicu
> >
Processing changes file:
libdatetime-timezone-perl_2.47-1+2022f_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 05:10:13PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>...
> Speaking of GCC 12 … #1022991 seems to have a first patch available
> upstream. Is there any chance that we could start this transition
> together with a fix for that bug?
IMHO it would be better to have 2.35 uploaded with
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 09:46:11AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> TL;DR I consider myself ready to start the transition now, with removals
> in the plan.
[...]
> Unless someone tells me I missed something I'll start uploading to
> unstable as soon as I feel I have a free time slot
Your message dated Sun, 30 Oct 2022 18:39:38 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1022705: unplanned transition: ghostscript
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022705,
regarding unplanned transition: ghostscript
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 2022-10-30 17:10, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.36.html
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2022-10-27 21:36:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1020799 [release.debian.org] transition: pkg-config
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1020799: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-10-20 11:25:13 +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’ve been rebuilding packages with pkgconf for the past couple of weeks, and
> it looks very good so far:
>
> http://pkgconf-migration.debian.net/
>
> I have identified and resolved some issues, and
18 matches
Mail list logo
